diff options
author | brane <brane@13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68> | 2002-07-15 01:25:05 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | brane <brane@13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68> | 2002-07-15 01:25:05 +0000 |
commit | b67bfcb2fb6ab0c7853f052feb7ce8cbe33d2d92 (patch) | |
tree | 74acfd4548439dec8f6799ce200a84442b9e40a4 /STATUS | |
parent | a84483c0a7122fdb0a70f5cb5eab32bbe606e607 (diff) | |
download | libapr-b67bfcb2fb6ab0c7853f052feb7ce8cbe33d2d92.tar.gz |
*** empty log message ***
git-svn-id: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/apr/apr/trunk@63658 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68
Diffstat (limited to 'STATUS')
-rw-r--r-- | STATUS | 9 |
1 files changed, 5 insertions, 4 deletions
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ APACHE PORTABLE RUNTIME (APR) LIBRARY STATUS: -*-text-*- -Last modified at [$Date: 2002/07/14 20:32:34 $] +Last modified at [$Date: 2002/07/15 01:25:05 $] Release: @@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ CURRENT VOTES: 1) Keeping the existing apr_time_t names, in spite of confusion with ANSI/C99 time_t's units, and prior decimal usec definition. - +1: rbb, jerenkrantz, striker, dreid, jim, jwoolley + +1: rbb, jerenkrantz, striker, dreid, jim, jwoolley, brane +0: wrowe [apr_types don't promise to map to C99/ANSI units] +0: brianp -1: aaron [veto for reusing the apr_time_t identifier for a new use] @@ -82,7 +82,7 @@ CURRENT VOTES: fielding [prefers apr_utime_t and apr_utimediff_t (64bit)] +0.5: jim -0: jerenkrantz, dreid - -0.5: rbb, jwoolley, striker + -0.5: rbb, jwoolley, striker, brane wrowe [prefers apr_utime_t and apr_uspan_t where u==undefined] 3) Renaming the function to get rid of apr_time_t vs time_t confusion, @@ -91,12 +91,13 @@ CURRENT VOTES: +0.5: wrowe, [prefers apr_time_busec_t and apr_span_busec_t] brianp, [can live with apr_time_busec_t and apr_span_busec_t] fielding [me too] + +0: brane -0: jerenkrantz -0.5: rbb, ianh, dreid, jim, jwoolley, striker 4) Using time_t and struct timeval/tm +1: fielding (if apr_time is not an ADT) - -1: brianp, wrowe, jwoolley + -1: brianp, wrowe, jwoolley, brane [fielding: Is APR time guaranteed to be a scalar quantity? If so, then we must include units as part of the definition of the |