summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/jsonschema/tests/test_jsonschema_test_suite.py
blob: cabfc21573a974f8b5349d45ea85509c4dc66e1c (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
"""
Test runner for the JSON Schema official test suite

Tests comprehensive correctness of each draft's validator.

See https://github.com/json-schema-org/JSON-Schema-Test-Suite for details.
"""

import sys
import warnings

from jsonschema import (
    Draft3Validator,
    Draft4Validator,
    Draft6Validator,
    Draft7Validator,
    draft3_format_checker,
    draft4_format_checker,
    draft6_format_checker,
    draft7_format_checker,
)
from jsonschema.tests._suite import Suite
from jsonschema.validators import _DEPRECATED_DEFAULT_TYPES, create


SUITE = Suite()
DRAFT3 = SUITE.version(name="draft3")
DRAFT4 = SUITE.version(name="draft4")
DRAFT6 = SUITE.version(name="draft6")
DRAFT7 = SUITE.version(name="draft7")


def skip_tests_containing_descriptions(**kwargs):
    def skipper(test):
        descriptions_and_reasons = kwargs.get(test.subject, {})
        return next(
            (
                reason
                for description, reason in descriptions_and_reasons.items()
                if description in test.description
            ),
            None,
        )
    return skipper


def missing_format(checker):
    def missing_format(test):
        schema = test.schema
        if schema is True or schema is False or "format" not in schema:
            return

        if schema["format"] not in checker.checkers:
            return "Format checker {0!r} not found.".format(schema["format"])
    return missing_format


is_narrow_build = sys.maxunicode == 2 ** 16 - 1
if is_narrow_build:  # pragma: no cover
    narrow_unicode_build = skip_tests_containing_descriptions(
        maxLength={
            "supplementary Unicode":
                "Not running surrogate Unicode case, this Python is narrow.",
        },
        minLength={
            "supplementary Unicode":
                "Not running surrogate Unicode case, this Python is narrow.",
        },
    )
else:
    def narrow_unicode_build(test):  # pragma: no cover
        return


TestDraft3 = DRAFT3.to_unittest_testcase(
    DRAFT3.tests(),
    DRAFT3.optional_tests_of(name="format"),
    DRAFT3.optional_tests_of(name="bignum"),
    DRAFT3.optional_tests_of(name="zeroTerminatedFloats"),
    Validator=Draft3Validator,
    format_checker=draft3_format_checker,
    skip=lambda test: (
        narrow_unicode_build(test) or
        missing_format(draft3_format_checker)(test) or
        skip_tests_containing_descriptions(
            format={
                "case-insensitive T and Z":  "Upstream bug in strict_rfc3339",
            },
        )(test)
    ),
)


TestDraft4 = DRAFT4.to_unittest_testcase(
    DRAFT4.tests(),
    DRAFT4.optional_tests_of(name="format"),
    DRAFT4.optional_tests_of(name="bignum"),
    DRAFT4.optional_tests_of(name="zeroTerminatedFloats"),
    Validator=Draft4Validator,
    format_checker=draft4_format_checker,
    skip=lambda test: (
        narrow_unicode_build(test) or
        missing_format(draft4_format_checker)(test) or
        skip_tests_containing_descriptions(
            format={
                "case-insensitive T and Z":  "Upstream bug in strict_rfc3339",
            },
            ref={
                "valid tree":  "An actual bug, this needs fixing.",
            },
            refRemote={
                "number is valid": "An actual bug, this needs fixing.",
                "string is invalid": "An actual bug, this needs fixing.",
            },
        )(test)
    ),
)


TestDraft6 = DRAFT6.to_unittest_testcase(
    DRAFT6.tests(),
    DRAFT6.optional_tests_of(name="format"),
    DRAFT6.optional_tests_of(name="bignum"),
    DRAFT6.optional_tests_of(name="zeroTerminatedFloats"),
    Validator=Draft6Validator,
    format_checker=draft6_format_checker,
    skip=lambda test: (
        narrow_unicode_build(test) or
        missing_format(draft6_format_checker)(test) or
        skip_tests_containing_descriptions(
            format={
                "case-insensitive T and Z": "Upstream bug in strict_rfc3339",
            },
            ref={
                "valid tree": "An actual bug, this needs fixing.",
            },
            refRemote={
                "number is valid": "An actual bug, this needs fixing.",
                "string is invalid": "An actual bug, this needs fixing.",
            },
        )(test)
    ),
)


TestDraft7 = DRAFT7.to_unittest_testcase(
    DRAFT7.tests(),
    DRAFT7.format_tests(),
    DRAFT7.optional_tests_of(name="bignum"),
    DRAFT7.optional_tests_of(name="zeroTerminatedFloats"),
    Validator=Draft7Validator,
    format_checker=draft7_format_checker,
    skip=lambda test: (
        narrow_unicode_build(test)
        or missing_format(draft7_format_checker)(test)
        or skip_tests_containing_descriptions(
            ref={
                "valid tree": "An actual bug, this needs fixing.",
            },
            refRemote={
                "number is valid": "An actual bug, this needs fixing.",
                "string is invalid": "An actual bug, this needs fixing.",
            },
        )(test)
        or skip_tests_containing_descriptions(
            **{
                "date-time": {
                    "case-insensitive T and Z":
                        "Upstream bug in strict_rfc3339",
                },
            }
        )(test)
    ),
)


with warnings.catch_warnings():
    warnings.simplefilter("ignore", DeprecationWarning)

    TestDraft3LegacyTypeCheck = DRAFT3.to_unittest_testcase(
        # Interestingly the any part couldn't really be done w/the old API.
        (
            (test for test in each if test.schema != {"type": "any"})
            for each in DRAFT3.tests_of(name="type")
        ),
        name="TestDraft3LegacyTypeCheck",
        Validator=create(
            meta_schema=Draft3Validator.META_SCHEMA,
            validators=Draft3Validator.VALIDATORS,
            default_types=_DEPRECATED_DEFAULT_TYPES,
        ),
    )

    TestDraft4LegacyTypeCheck = DRAFT4.to_unittest_testcase(
        DRAFT4.tests_of(name="type"),
        name="TestDraft4LegacyTypeCheck",
        Validator=create(
            meta_schema=Draft4Validator.META_SCHEMA,
            validators=Draft4Validator.VALIDATORS,
            default_types=_DEPRECATED_DEFAULT_TYPES,
        ),
    )