diff options
author | Vernon Mauery <vernon.mauery@intel.com> | 2018-10-31 13:38:03 -0700 |
---|---|---|
committer | Alexander Amelkin <mocbuhtig@amelkin.msk.ru> | 2018-11-11 14:55:43 +0300 |
commit | 576d4855d9bb6cb6ca3d231ebc604836b8dba255 (patch) | |
tree | 4a93a5fcd9a040b619fc8d947cabd9830643f9a0 | |
parent | f2780c5d8611c428b8ce21a0986a5caf2346fd16 (diff) | |
download | ipmitool-576d4855d9bb6cb6ca3d231ebc604836b8dba255.tar.gz |
[compiler-warnings-fixes] use correct fall through comment
In some of the SDR calculating code, there were switch statements that
had cases that would fall through deliberately into the next case. But
the compiler didn't like the comment and would complain about the fall
through anyway. This changes to a comment that the compiler recognizes.
Partially resolves ipmitool/ipmitool#13
Signed-off-by: Vernon Mauery <vernon.mauery@intel.com>
-rw-r--r-- | lib/ipmi_sdr.c | 6 |
1 files changed, 3 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/lib/ipmi_sdr.c b/lib/ipmi_sdr.c index bac9bea..d51c174 100644 --- a/lib/ipmi_sdr.c +++ b/lib/ipmi_sdr.c @@ -205,7 +205,7 @@ sdr_convert_sensor_reading(struct sdr_record_full_sensor *sensor, uint8_t val) case 1: if (val & 0x80) val++; - /* Deliberately fall through to case 2. */ + /* fall through */ case 2: result = (double) (((m * (int8_t) val) + (b * pow(10, k1))) * pow(10, k2)); @@ -285,7 +285,7 @@ sdr_convert_sensor_hysterisis(struct sdr_record_full_sensor *sensor, uint8_t val case 1: if (val & 0x80) val++; - /* Deliberately fall through to case 2. */ + /* fall through */ case 2: result = (double) (((m * (int8_t) val) ) * pow(10, k2)); break; @@ -360,7 +360,7 @@ sdr_convert_sensor_tolerance(struct sdr_record_full_sensor *sensor, uint8_t val) case 1: if (val & 0x80) val++; - /* Deliberately fall through to case 2. */ + /* fall through */ case 2: result = (double) (((m * ((double)((int8_t) val)/2))) * pow(10, k2)); break; |