| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
AST changes to prepare for API annotations
Add locations to parts of the AST so that API annotations can
then be added.
The outline of the whole process is captured here
https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/wiki/GhcAstAnnotations
This change updates the haddock submodule.
Test Plan: sh ./validate
Reviewers: austin, simonpj, Mikolaj
Reviewed By: simonpj, Mikolaj
Subscribers: thomie, goldfire, carter
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.haskell.org/D426
GHC Trac Issues: #9628
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This covers things like
Eq a => blah and (?x::Int) => blah
where there is just one predicate. Previously we used an ad-hoc
test to decide whether to parenthesise it, but acutally there is
a much simpler solution: just use the existing precedence mechamism.
This applies both to Type and HsType.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This matches GCC's choice of Unicode quotation marks (i.e. U+2018 and U+2019)
and therefore looks more familiar on the console. This addresses #2507.
Signed-off-by: Herbert Valerio Riedel <hvr@gnu.org>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Seeing "<document comment>" when trying to debug things in Haddock is
utterly useless and because this instance exists, we can't even make our
own. No instance at all would be better than what it was!
Admittedly, this doesn't produce the nicest output. Perhaps wrapping the
comments in {- -} would be in order but I think it's fine until someone
complains.
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
