| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
In 0d3bf62092de83375025edca6f7242812338542d, I handled lazy @(Int -> Int) f x
correctly, but failed to handle lazy @Int (f x) (we need
to collect arguments in f x). Additionally, if we have
lazy @Int (case ...) (or anything that's not an application,
we have to bounce back to cpeRhsE.
Signed-off-by: Edward Z. Yang <ezyang@cs.stanford.edu>
Test Plan: validate
Reviewers: simonpj, nomeata, austin, bgamari
Subscribers: thomie
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.haskell.org/D2471
|
|
|
|
|
| |
as proposed in #12435, as it easily gets in the way of development when
it reports false positives.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Edward Z. Yang <ezyang@cs.stanford.edu>
Test Plan: validate
Reviewers: simonpj, austin, bgamari
Subscribers: thomie
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.haskell.org/D2444
GHC Trac Issues: #12472
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
This also drops the parked fix from
efa7b3a474bc373201ab145c129262a73c86f959
(though I didn't revert the refactoring).
Signed-off-by: Edward Z. Yang <ezyang@cs.stanford.edu>
Test Plan: validate
Reviewers: simonpj, austin, bgamari
Subscribers: thomie
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.haskell.org/D2211
GHC Trac Issues: #10083
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Edward Z. Yang <ezyang@cs.stanford.edu>
Test Plan: validate
Reviewers: simonpj, austin, bgamari
Subscribers: thomie
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.haskell.org/D2246
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Edward Z. Yang <ezyang@cs.stanford.edu>
Test Plan: validate
Reviewers: simonpj, austin, bgamari
Subscribers: thomie
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.haskell.org/D2209
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The idea behind adding special "rubbish" arguments was in unboxed sum types
depending on the tag some arguments are not used and we don't want to move some
special values (like 0 for literals and some special pointer for boxed slots)
for those arguments (to stack locations or registers). "StgRubbishArg" was an
indicator to the code generator that the value won't be used. During Stg-to-Cmm
we were then not generating any move or store instructions at all.
This caused problems in the register allocator because some variables were only
initialized in some code paths. As an example, suppose we have this STG: (after
unarise)
Lib.$WT =
\r [dt_sit]
case
case dt_sit of {
Lib.F dt_siv [Occ=Once] ->
(#,,#) [1# dt_siv StgRubbishArg::GHC.Prim.Int#];
Lib.I dt_siw [Occ=Once] ->
(#,,#) [2# StgRubbishArg::GHC.Types.Any dt_siw];
}
of
dt_six
{ (#,,#) us_giC us_giD us_giE -> Lib.T [us_giC us_giD us_giE];
};
This basically unpacks a sum type to an unboxed sum with 3 fields, and then
moves the unboxed sum to a constructor (`Lib.T`).
This is the Cmm for the inner case expression (case expression in the scrutinee
position of the outer case):
ciN:
...
-- look at dt_sit's tag
if (_ciT::P64 != 1) goto ciS; else goto ciR;
ciS: -- Tag is 2, i.e. Lib.F
_siw::I64 = I64[_siu::P64 + 6];
_giE::I64 = _siw::I64;
_giD::P64 = stg_RUBBISH_ENTRY_info;
_giC::I64 = 2;
goto ciU;
ciR: -- Tag is 1, i.e. Lib.I
_siv::P64 = P64[_siu::P64 + 7];
_giD::P64 = _siv::P64;
_giC::I64 = 1;
goto ciU;
Here one of the blocks `ciS` and `ciR` is executed and then the execution
continues to `ciR`, but only `ciS` initializes `_giE`, in the other branch
`_giE` is not initialized, because it's "rubbish" in the STG and so we don't
generate an assignment during code generator. The code generator then panics
during the register allocations:
ghc-stage1: panic! (the 'impossible' happened)
(GHC version 8.1.20160722 for x86_64-unknown-linux):
LocalReg's live-in to graph ciY {_giE::I64}
(`_giD` is also "rubbish" in `ciS`, but it's still initialized because it's a
pointer slot, we have to initialize it otherwise garbage collector follows the
pointer to some random place. So we only remove assignment if the "rubbish" arg
has unboxed type.)
This patch removes `StgRubbishArg` and `CmmArg`. We now always initialize
rubbish slots. If the slot is for boxed types we use the existing `absentError`,
otherwise we initialize the slot with literal 0.
Reviewers: simonpj, erikd, austin, simonmar, bgamari
Reviewed By: erikd
Subscribers: thomie
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.haskell.org/D2446
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
This patch implements primitive unboxed sum types, as described in
https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/wiki/UnpackedSumTypes.
Main changes are:
- Add new syntax for unboxed sums types, terms and patterns. Hidden
behind `-XUnboxedSums`.
- Add unlifted unboxed sum type constructors and data constructors,
extend type and pattern checkers and desugarer.
- Add new RuntimeRep for unboxed sums.
- Extend unarise pass to translate unboxed sums to unboxed tuples right
before code generation.
- Add `StgRubbishArg` to `StgArg`, and a new type `CmmArg` for better
code generation when sum values are involved.
- Add user manual section for unboxed sums.
Some other changes:
- Generalize `UbxTupleRep` to `MultiRep` and `UbxTupAlt` to
`MultiValAlt` to be able to use those with both sums and tuples.
- Don't use `tyConPrimRep` in `isVoidTy`: `tyConPrimRep` is really
wrong, given an `Any` `TyCon`, there's no way to tell what its kind
is, but `kindPrimRep` and in turn `tyConPrimRep` returns `PtrRep`.
- Fix some bugs on the way: #12375.
Not included in this patch:
- Update Haddock for new the new unboxed sum syntax.
- `TemplateHaskell` support is left as future work.
For reviewers:
- Front-end code is mostly trivial and adapted from unboxed tuple code
for type checking, pattern checking, renaming, desugaring etc.
- Main translation routines are in `RepType` and `UnariseStg`.
Documentation in `UnariseStg` should be enough for understanding
what's going on.
Credits:
- Johan Tibell wrote the initial front-end and interface file
extensions.
- Simon Peyton Jones reviewed this patch many times, wrote some code,
and helped with debugging.
Reviewers: bgamari, alanz, goldfire, RyanGlScott, simonpj, austin,
simonmar, hvr, erikd
Reviewed By: simonpj
Subscribers: Iceland_jack, ggreif, ezyang, RyanGlScott, goldfire,
thomie, mpickering
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.haskell.org/D2259
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
We have the FloatOut pass create exported ids for floated StaticPtr
bindings. The simplifier doesn't try to remove those.
This patch also improves on 7fc20b by making a common definition
collectStaticPtrSatArgs to test for StaticPtr binds.
Fixes #12207.
Test Plan: ./validate
Reviewers: simonpj, austin, bgamari, simonmar, goldfire
Reviewed By: simonpj
Subscribers: thomie
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.haskell.org/D2366
GHC Trac Issues: #12207
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
In an instance declaration when you don't specify the code for a
method, GHC fills in from the default binding in the class.
The type of the default method can legitmiately be ambiguous ---
see Note [Default methods in instances] in TcInstDcls --- so
typechecking it can be tricky.
Trac #12220 showed that although we were dealing with that ambiguity
for /vanilla/ default methods, we were not doing so for /generic/
default methods. Moreover we were dealing with it clumsily, by
generating post-typechecked code.
This patch fixes the bug AND deletes code! We now use the same code
path for both vanilla and generic default methods; and generate
/pre-typechecked/ code in both cases. The key trick is that we can use
Visible Type Application to deal with the ambiguity, which wasn't
possible before. Hooray.
There is a small hit to performance in compiler/perf/T1969 which
consists of nothing BUT instance declarations with several default
methods to fill, which we now have to typecheck. The actual hit is
from 724 -> 756 or 4% in that extreme example. Real world programs
have vastly fewer instance decls.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
This patch uses collectArgsTicks instead of collectArgs to test that
StaticPtr only occurs at the top of RHSs of top-level expressions.
Ticks introduced by -fhpc would interfere otherwise.
Test Plan: ./validate
Reviewers: thomie, austin, goldfire, bgamari, simonpj
Reviewed By: simonpj
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.haskell.org/D2355
GHC Trac Issues: #12207
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
Background:
* sizeExpr was calculating expressions like ((e `cast` T) x) wrongly
* Fixing it caused regressions in compile performance, and one nofib
program (k-nucleotide)
I managed to fix the source of the compiler regressions. I think it was
due to traceTc not being inlined, which I fixed in a more robust way by
putting an export list on TcRnMonad.
The k-nucleotide regression is more difficult. I don't think anything
is actually going wrong, but this program has been highly tuned and is
quite sensitive to changing in inlining behaviour. I managed to recover
most of the performance by manual lambda-lifting which makes it a bit
less fragile, but the end result was a bit slower. I don't think this
is disastrous, the program is pretty horrible to begin with and we could
probably make a faster one by starting from scratch.
Test Plan: validate, nofib
Reviewers: simonpj, bgamari, niteria, austin, erikd
Subscribers: thomie
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.haskell.org/D2338
GHC Trac Issues: #11564
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Before this patch, following the TypeInType innovations,
each TyCon had two lists:
- tyConBinders :: [TyBinder]
- tyConTyVars :: [TyVar]
They were in 1-1 correspondence and contained
overlapping information. More broadly, there were many
places where we had to pass around this pair of lists,
instead of a single list.
This commit tidies all that up, by having just one list of
binders in a TyCon:
- tyConBinders :: [TyConBinder]
The new data types look like this:
Var.hs:
data TyVarBndr tyvar vis = TvBndr tyvar vis
data VisibilityFlag = Visible | Specified | Invisible
type TyVarBinder = TyVarBndr TyVar VisibilityFlag
TyCon.hs:
type TyConBinder = TyVarBndr TyVar TyConBndrVis
data TyConBndrVis
= NamedTCB VisibilityFlag
| AnonTCB
TyCoRep.hs:
data TyBinder
= Named TyVarBinder
| Anon Type
Note that Var.TyVarBdr has moved from TyCoRep and has been
made polymorphic in the tyvar and visiblity fields:
type TyVarBinder = TyVarBndr TyVar VisibilityFlag
-- Used in ForAllTy
type TyConBinder = TyVarBndr TyVar TyConBndrVis
-- Used in TyCon
type IfaceForAllBndr = TyVarBndr IfaceTvBndr VisibilityFlag
type IfaceTyConBinder = TyVarBndr IfaceTvBndr TyConBndrVis
-- Ditto, in interface files
There are a zillion knock-on changes, but everything
arises from these types. It was a bit fiddly to get the
module loops to work out right!
Some smaller points
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
* Nice new functions
TysPrim.mkTemplateKiTyVars
TysPrim.mkTemplateTyConBinders
which help you make the tyvar binders for dependently-typed
TyCons. See comments with their definition.
* The change showed up a bug in TcGenGenerics.tc_mkRepTy, where the code
was making an assumption about the order of the kind variables in the
kind of GHC.Generics.(:.:). I fixed this; see TcGenGenerics.mkComp.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
With TypeInType Richard combined ForAllTy and FunTy, but that was often
awkward, and yielded little benefit becuase in practice the two were
always treated separately. This patch re-introduces FunTy. Specfically
* New type
data TyVarBinder = TvBndr TyVar VisibilityFlag
This /always/ has a TyVar it. In many places that's just what
what we want, so there are /lots/ of TyBinder -> TyVarBinder changes
* TyBinder still exists:
data TyBinder = Named TyVarBinder | Anon Type
* data Type = ForAllTy TyVarBinder Type
| FunTy Type Type
| ....
There are a LOT of knock-on changes, but they are all routine.
The Haddock submodule needs to be updated too
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
It uses Ord DataCon which uses Ord Unique which is
nondeterministic
GHC Trac: #4012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
This mostly follows the plan detailed by the discussion
Simon and I had, with one difference: instead of grabbing
the free variables of the trivial expressions to get the
embedded Ids, we just use getIdFromTrivialExpr_maybe to extract
out the Id. If there is no Id, the expression cannot
refer to a function (as there are no literal functions)
and thus we do not need to saturate.
Signed-off-by: Edward Z. Yang <ezyang@cs.stanford.edu>
Test Plan: validate
Reviewers: simonpj, austin, bgamari
Subscribers: thomie
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.haskell.org/D2309
GHC Trac Issues: #12076
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is the proper fix for the problem I tried solve with D2310
(committed as dd33245 and reverted in 44a3c18).
Reviewers: austin, goldfire, bgamari
Reviewed By: bgamari
Subscribers: thomie
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.haskell.org/D2315
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
chooseOrphanAnchor now takes a NameSet, relieving the callers
from the burden of converting it to a list
Test Plan: ./validate
Reviewers: bgamari, ezyang, austin, simonmar, simonpj
Subscribers: thomie
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.haskell.org/D2294
GHC Trac Issues: #4012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
Deriving `Typeable` has been a no-op since GHC 7.10, and now that we
require 7.10+ to build GHC, we can remove all the redundant `deriving Typeable`
statements in GHC.
Test Plan: ./validate
Reviewers: goldfire, austin, hvr, bgamari
Reviewed By: austin, hvr, bgamari
Subscribers: thomie
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.haskell.org/D2260
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This kills two instances of varSetElems that turned out to be
nondeterministic. I've tried to untangle this before, but it's
a bit hard with the fixDs in the middle. Fortunately I now have
a test case that proves that we need determinism here.
Test Plan: ./validate, new testcase
Reviewers: simonpj, simonmar, austin, bgamari
Reviewed By: bgamari
Subscribers: thomie
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.haskell.org/D2258
GHC Trac Issues: #4012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
I had to refactor some things to take VarSet instead of [Var],
but I think it's more precise this way.
Test Plan: ./validate
Reviewers: simonmar, simonpj, austin, bgamari, goldfire
Reviewed By: simonpj
Subscribers: thomie
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.haskell.org/D2227
GHC Trac Issues: #4012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Nondeterminism doesn't matter in these places and pprUFM makes
it obvious. I've flipped the order of arguments for convenience.
Test Plan: ./validate
Reviewers: simonmar, bgamari, austin, simonpj
Reviewed By: simonpj
Subscribers: thomie
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.haskell.org/D2205
GHC Trac Issues: #4012
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
foldUFM introduces unnecessary non-determinism that actually
leads to different generated code as explained in
Note [TrieMap determinism].
As we're switching from UniqFM to UniqDFM here you might be
concerned about performance. There's nothing that ./validate
detects. nofib reports no change in Compile Allocations, but
Compile Time got better on some tests and worse on some,
yielding this summary:
-1 s.d. ----- -3.8%
+1 s.d. ----- +5.4%
Average ----- +0.7%
This is not a fair comparison as the order of Uniques
changes what GHC is actually doing. One benefit from making
this deterministic is also that it will make the
performance results more stable.
Full nofib results: P108
Test Plan: ./validate, nofib
Reviewers: goldfire, simonpj, simonmar, austin, bgamari
Reviewed By: simonpj
Subscribers: thomie
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.haskell.org/D2169
GHC Trac Issues: #4012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
With this patch closed variables are allowed regardless of whether
they are bound at the top level or not.
The FloatOut pass is always performed. When optimizations are
disabled, only expressions that go to the top level are floated.
Thus, the applications of the StaticPtr data constructor are always
floated.
The CoreTidy pass makes sure the floated applications appear in the
symbol table of object files. It also collects the floated bindings
and inserts them in the static pointer table.
The renamer does not check anymore if free variables appearing in the
static form are top-level. Instead, the typechecker looks at the
tct_closed flag to decide if the free variables are closed.
The linter checks that applications of StaticPtr only occur at the
top of top-level bindings after the FloatOut pass.
The field spInfoName of StaticPtrInfo has been removed. It used to
contain the name of the top-level binding that contains the StaticPtr
application. However, this information is no longer available when the
StaticPtr is constructed, as the binding name is determined now by the
FloatOut pass.
Test Plan: ./validate
Reviewers: goldfire, simonpj, austin, hvr, bgamari
Reviewed By: simonpj
Subscribers: thomie, mpickering, mboes
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.haskell.org/D2104
GHC Trac Issues: #11656
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Previously, the state hack would be implemented in mkLocalId, by looking
at the type, and setting the OneShot flag accordingly.
This patch changes this so that the OneShot flag faithfully represents
what our various analyses found out, and the State Hack is implemented
by adjusting the accessors, in particular isOneShotBndr and
idStateHackOneShotInfo. This makes it easier to understand what's going
on in the analyses, and de-clutters core dumps and interface files.
I don’t expect any change in behaviour, at least not in non-fringe
cases.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
It's possible to get rid of this use site in a local way
and it introduces unneccessary nondeterminism.
Test Plan: ./validate
Reviewers: simonmar, goldfire, austin, bgamari, simonpj
Reviewed By: simonpj
Subscribers: thomie
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.haskell.org/D2122
GHC Trac Issues: #4012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is from Simon's suggestion:
* `tyCoVarsOfTypesAcc` is a terrible name for a function with a
perfectly decent type `[Type] -> FV`. Maybe `tyCoFVsOfTypes`?
Similarly others
* `runFVList` is also terrible, but also has a decent type.
Maybe just `fvVarList` (and `fvVarSet` for `runFVSet`).
* `someVars` could be `mkFVs :: [Var] -> FV`.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This adds the tyvars of the domain of the substitution into the in-scope
set as well.
What I'm not sure here is if the kinds can have any free vars that
should be in the in-scope set as well.
Test Plan: ./validate
Reviewers: goldfire, austin, bgamari, simonpj
Reviewed By: simonpj
Subscribers: thomie, simonmar
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.haskell.org/D2094
GHC Trac Issues: #11371
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When you do `varSetElems (tyCoVarsOfType x)` it's equivalent to
`tyCoVarsOfTypeList x`.
Why? If you look at the implementation:
```
tyCoVarsOfTypeList ty = runFVList $ tyCoVarsOfTypeAcc ty
tyCoVarsOfType ty = runFVSet $ tyCoVarsOfTypeAcc ty
```
they use the same helper function. The helper function returns a
deterministically ordered list and a set. The only difference
between the two is which part of the result they take. It is redundant
to take the set and then immediately convert it to a list.
This helps with determinism and we eventually want to replace the uses
of `varSetElems` with functions that don't leak the values of uniques.
This change gets rid of some instances that are easy to kill.
I chose not to annotate every place where I got rid of `varSetElems`
with a comment about non-determinism, because once we get rid of
`varSetElems` it will not be possible to do the wrong thing.
Test Plan: ./validate
Reviewers: goldfire, austin, simonmar, bgamari, simonpj
Reviewed By: simonpj
Subscribers: thomie
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.haskell.org/D2115
GHC Trac Issues: #4012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
in order to have precise used-once information in the exported
strictness signatures, as well as precise used-once information on
thunks. This avoids the bad effects of #11731.
The subsequent worker-wrapper pass is responsible for removing the
demand environment part of the strictness signature. It does not run
after the final demand analyzer pass, so remove this also in CoreTidy.
The subsequent worker-wrapper pass is also responsible for removing
used-once-information from the demands and strictness signatures, as
these might not be preserved by the simplifier. This is _not_ done by
CoreTidy, because we _do_ want this information, as produced by the last
round of the demand analyzer, to be available to the code generator.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.haskell.org/D2073
|
|
|
|
| |
Someone must have forgotten to change this.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
as they (especially their id info with absence information) clutter the
output too much. They come back with debug_on.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.haskell.org/D2072
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Richard accidetally introduced this change in his big kind-equality
patch. The code is wrong, and potentially could cause binders to
be re-ordered.
Worth merging to 8.0.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
As pointed out by @simonpj on D2044 we don't need
to compute the free vars of the range of the substitution
as most of them are already carried by the monad.
This should be a tiny performance improvement over the version
from before D2044.
Also removes an extra function that is now unnecessary.
Test Plan: ./validate && ./validate --slow
Reviewers: goldfire, simonpj, austin, bgamari
Reviewed By: simonpj
Subscribers: thomie, simonmar, simonpj
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.haskell.org/D2060
GHC Trac Issues: #11371
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
to be consistent with the other uses of nop vs. top in Demand.hs. Also,
stop prettyprinting top strictness signatures in Core dumps.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We need the free vars of `t2` to satisfy the substitution
invariant. Luckily they are in the in-scope carried around.
Test Plan: ./validate
Reviewers: bgamari, austin, goldfire, simonpj
Reviewed By: simonpj
Subscribers: thomie, simonmar
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.haskell.org/D2044
GHC Trac Issues: #11371
|
|
|
|
| |
There's no functional change here, just tidying up
|