summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/compiler/GHC/Core/Seq.hs
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorSimon Peyton Jones <simonpj@microsoft.com>2021-04-16 15:11:43 +0100
committerBen Gamari <ben@smart-cactus.org>2021-11-23 20:59:53 -0500
commitb71da5fe871f0236b4033c7cac523fe776a56b29 (patch)
tree1c07bb1bcbd639c402bf0e910292e55683441eda /compiler/GHC/Core/Seq.hs
parent9dcb2ad15df54e209cfae3dd1f51cf8e8d6c69d5 (diff)
downloadhaskell-wip/T3781.tar.gz
Make UnfoldingGuidance account for free variableswip/T3781
For over a decade (#3781) I've wondered whether GHC's UnfoldingGuidance should take account of free variables. For example: f x = let g y = case x of .... in ...(case x of ....g e....)... If we inline the call to g in the body of the case x, we can save re-evaluating (and case analysis of) x. This very similar to the "discounts" we give for arguments. All we need is to do it for free variables. It turned out to be rather easy. * Beef up GHC.Core.Unfold.sizeExpr to accumulate discounts for free variables. * Beef up GHC.Core.Unfold.callSiteInline to compute those discounts, based on info in the InScopeSet Fixes #3781 Also fixes #19643 (which reminded me of this issue)
Diffstat (limited to 'compiler/GHC/Core/Seq.hs')
-rw-r--r--compiler/GHC/Core/Seq.hs5
1 files changed, 3 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/compiler/GHC/Core/Seq.hs b/compiler/GHC/Core/Seq.hs
index 0addae9775..3bfa34e1fd 100644
--- a/compiler/GHC/Core/Seq.hs
+++ b/compiler/GHC/Core/Seq.hs
@@ -112,5 +112,6 @@ seqUnfolding (CoreUnfolding { uf_tmpl = e, uf_is_top = top,
seqUnfolding _ = ()
seqGuidance :: UnfoldingGuidance -> ()
-seqGuidance (UnfIfGoodArgs ns n b) = n `seq` sum ns `seq` b `seq` ()
-seqGuidance _ = ()
+seqGuidance (UnfIfGoodArgs ns ds n b) = n `seq` sum ns `seq` ds `seq` b `seq` ()
+ -- We use strict maps so I think `seq` ds will do
+seqGuidance _ = ()