summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/gtk/gtkcssarrayvalue.c
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* cssvalue: Remove GtkCssDependenciesBenjamin Otte2015-03-181-6/+2
| | | | They are not used anymore.
* css: Move scale to GtkStyleProviderPrivatewip/mir2Benjamin Otte2015-02-061-4/+3
| | | | | | This way, we can remove it as a separate argument from gtk_css_value_compute() and allow computation to only depend on one thing: the style provider.
* cssstyle: Rename GtkCssComputedValues => GtkCssStyleBenjamin Otte2015-01-071-2/+2
| | | | | This is literally just renaming of the object (and the associated source files). No other changes are in there.
* css: add properties for outline-radiusCosimo Cecchi2014-05-011-0/+4
| | | | | | Both a shorthand and individual properties. This is not officially part of the CSS standard, but there's precedence for it at least in Mozilla: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/-moz-outline-radius
* css: Add a scale argument to css-value compute vfuncAlexander Larsson2013-07-031-1/+2
| | | | | | | | We need to be able to compute different GtkCssImage values depending on the scale, and we need this at compute time so that we don't need to read any images other than the scale in used (to e.g. calculate the image size). GtkStyleProviderPrivate is shared for all style contexts, so its not right.
* css: Avoid allocations in gtk_css_value_array_computeAlexander Larsson2012-12-041-13/+18
| | | | | | Almost all array computations lead to no changes (99% in nautilus) so we avoid the upfront allocation and delay it until we know its needed. This drops the allocate/free from the profile.
* css: Huge refactoring to avoid computing wrong valuesBenjamin Otte2012-09-281-5/+7
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Here's the shortest description of the bug I can come up with: When computing values, we have 3 kinds of dependencies: (1) other properties ("currentColor" or em values) (2) inherited properties ("inherit") (3) generic things from the theme (@keyframes or @define-color) Previously, we passed the GtkStyleContext as an argument, because it provided these 3 things using: (1) _gtk_style_context_peek_property() (2) _gtk_style_context_peek_property(gtk_style_context_get_parent()) (3) context->priv->cascade However, this makes it impossible to lookup values other than the ones accessible via _gtk_style_context_peek_property(). And this is exactly what we are doing in gtk_style_context_update_cache(). So when the cache updates encountered case (1), they were looking up the values from the wrong style data. So this large patch essentially does nothing but replace the context argument in all compute functions with new arguments for the 3 cases above: (1) values (2) parent_values (3) provider We apparently have a lot of computing code.
* cssvalue: Fix out-of-bounds in array transition codeBenjamin Otte2012-09-171-2/+2
|
* cssvalue: Implement transitioning arraysBenjamin Otte2012-09-031-1/+193
| | | | | Or rather: Implement it for backgrounds, as the animation rules for arrays vary by property.
* cssvalue: Pass property ID to transition functionBenjamin Otte2012-09-031-0/+1
| | | | | | | This is to allow animating arrays properly. I'm not really thrilled about this solution (we leak propertys into the values again...), but it's the best I can come up with - I prefer it to having N different array types...
* cssvalue: Don't allow empty arrays anymoreBenjamin Otte2012-09-031-4/+1
| | | | | CSS arrays aren't empty, even the ones that appear empty contain one "none" element.
* cssvalue: Make the array parser no longer parse "none"Benjamin Otte2012-09-031-6/+1
| | | | Arrays that support it, handle it themselves.
* css: Handle some more simple cases of dependenciesMatthias Clasen2012-08-281-3/+5
|
* css: Introduce dependencies for value computationsBenjamin Otte2012-08-281-4/+7
| | | | | | | | | When values are computed, they might depend on various other values and we need to track this so we can update the values when those other values change. This is the first step in making that happen. This patch does not do any dependency tracking at all, instead it uses GTK_CSS_DEPENDS_ON_EVERYTHING as a sort of FIXME.
* css: Pass property_id to compute functionBenjamin Otte2012-08-281-1/+2
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This is a reorganization of how value computing should be done. Previously the GtkCssStyleProperty.compute vfunc was supposed to take care of special cases when it needed those for computation. However, this proved to be very complicated in cases where values were nested and only the last value (of a common type) needed to be special cased. A common example for this was the fallback handling for unresolvable colors. Now, we pass the property's ID along with all compute functions so we can do the special casing where it's necessary. Note that no actual changes happen in this commit. This will happen in follow-ups.
* css: Introduce _gtk_css_value_compute()Benjamin Otte2012-08-281-31/+28
| | | | | | | This commit is essentially a large reorganization. Instead of all value subtypes having their own compute function, there is the general _gtk_css_value_compute() function that then calls a vfunc on the subtype.
* cssvalue: Make GtkCssShadowValue only hold one shadowBenjamin Otte2012-04-171-0/+31
| | | | | | All the properties now are a GtkCssArrayValue of GtkCssSadowValue. GtkCssArrayValue already does everything we want, so no need to duplicate its funtionality.
* cssarrayvalue: Redo parsing arraysBenjamin Otte2012-04-171-6/+50
| | | | | | | Does 3 things: 1) Introduce a "none" array signleton 2) Get rid of memleaks in error paths 3) Reduce code in parse funcs
* cssvalue: Add _gtk_css_value_transition()Benjamin Otte2012-04-171-0/+9
| | | | | | | Returns a value that transitions between start and end or %NULL if the values cannot be transitioned. So far, all implementations but numbers and rgba return NULL.
* cssvalue: Add _gtk_css_value_equal()Benjamin Otte2012-04-171-0/+20
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | For now, we return FALSE for all default css values, so this is not very useful. I also think of this as an optimization equal, not a guaranteed equal, because we don't even have a notion of what "equal" means. For example, for background-repeat, "repeat, repeat" and "repeat" are functionally equivalent. But the cssvalue has no idea that it's used for background-repeat. As a more complicated example, "repeat, no-repeat" and "repeat" are equal to what one sees as long as there's only one image listed background-image-source. But once you start transition'ing to an image with 2 sources, it's different...
* cssvalue: Add a CSS value for arraysBenjamin Otte2012-04-171-0/+102
Make the value auto-cycle its child values, so it can be used for background properties.