diff options
author | Tim Janik <timj@gimp.org> | 1998-02-11 00:40:20 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Tim Janik <timj@src.gnome.org> | 1998-02-11 00:40:20 +0000 |
commit | ed848ac41e726b2ca27ccdf474f66def61a7f9e5 (patch) | |
tree | f764a207c04e6db43c723b94319a50ce6c07db23 /docs/developers.txt | |
parent | 2090cc650c7d1c391f1d78d85469b5589982f790 (diff) | |
download | gtk+-ed848ac41e726b2ca27ccdf474f66def61a7f9e5.tar.gz |
backed out the section "Gnits to care about". new file, kinda developers
Wed Feb 11 00:18:31 1998 Tim Janik <timj@gimp.org>
* docs/refcounting.txt: backed out the section "Gnits to care about".
* docs/developers.txt: new file, kinda developers FAQ.
Diffstat (limited to 'docs/developers.txt')
-rw-r--r-- | docs/developers.txt | 69 |
1 files changed, 69 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/docs/developers.txt b/docs/developers.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..ee78bea4f8 --- /dev/null +++ b/docs/developers.txt @@ -0,0 +1,69 @@ +Things to care about when using/programing for GTK+ +=================================================== + +This file is meant to collect some frequently triggered failures when +programming for/with Gtk, having the spirit of a developers FAQ. +It is also the correct place to list up things that programmers should +care about in general. + +In the hope that this text might be usefull to someone, + + - Tim Janik <timj@gimp.org> + 1998/02/11 + + +Automatic destruction of widgets on removal from parent +------------------------------------------------------- + +This is a reference counting issue, you would want to refer +to refcounting.txt on it. + + +What are all the widget flags about? +------------------------------------ + +Refer to the file widget_system.txt which covers widget flags and the +resulting invariants in a detailed way. + + +GdkWindow pointers may be NULL in GdkEvents +------------------------------------------- + +The notification nature of the signal mechanism might cause events to +be emitted that have their GdkWindow pointer set to NULL. +This is due to the fact that certain events need to be emitted after the +real GdkWindow of a widget is not any longer pertinent. +It's up to the signal handling function (application) to check for the +window field of the event structure to be != NULL, if it is going to +perform any operations through Gdk calls on it. +Events that a likely to trigger a missing check for the window pointer +currently are (and correspond to the trailing signals): + +GDK_SELECTION_CLEAR GtkWidget::selection_clear_event +GDK_FOCUS_CHANGE GtkWidget::focus_in_event + GtkWidget::focus_out_event + +Events that are asured to have a valid GdkEvent.any.window field are + +GDK_EXPOSE GtkWidget::expose_event + + +gtk_widget_ref() vs. gtk_object_ref() +------------------------------------- + +The widget referencing functions gtk_widget_ref() and gtk_widget_unref() +are currently just wrappers about the corresponding referencing functions +for objects. Still you should use the widget referencing functions if you +are sure the referenced object is of type GTK_WIDGET_TYPE. + + +Writing Gdk functions +--------------------- + +When writing Gdk functions that operate on GdkWindow structures in any +maeningfull sense, that is casting to a GdkWindowPrivate structure for +access to fields other then GdkWindow.user_data, the programmer is +recommended to check for the GdkWindowPrivate.destroyed field to be == +FALSE, especially if the GdkWindowPrivate.xwindow field is used. +Silent abortion of the Gdk function is the correct behaviour if this +condition isn't met. |