diff options
| author | csilvers <csilvers@6b5cf1ce-ec42-a296-1ba9-69fdba395a50> | 2011-02-08 01:03:37 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | csilvers <csilvers@6b5cf1ce-ec42-a296-1ba9-69fdba395a50> | 2011-02-08 01:03:37 +0000 |
| commit | dd3d9d969e9b889e96c2af497e436856fac1a2a7 (patch) | |
| tree | 730efae89ef85f6127a87364755c0393ecdf6b7f /NEWS | |
| parent | 7375b4f3cb3ab4471d0016017be5e18ba5451c5f (diff) | |
| download | gperftools-dd3d9d969e9b889e96c2af497e436856fac1a2a7.tar.gz | |
* Fix tcmalloc_unittest on MSVC 10 in release mode (csilvers)
* Fix malloc_hook_c.h to compile with -ansi under gcc (csilvers)
git-svn-id: http://gperftools.googlecode.com/svn/trunk@104 6b5cf1ce-ec42-a296-1ba9-69fdba395a50
Diffstat (limited to 'NEWS')
| -rw-r--r-- | NEWS | 13 |
1 files changed, 12 insertions, 1 deletions
@@ -1,4 +1,15 @@ -== 04 February 2011 == +== 7 February 2011 == + +Thanks to endlessr..., who +[http://code.google.com/p/google-perftools/issues/detail?id=307 identified] +why some tests were failing under MSVC 10 in release mode. It does not look +like these failures point toward any problem with tcmalloc itself; rather, the +problem is with the test, which made some assumptions that broke under the +some aggressive optimizations used in MSVC 10. I'll fix the test, but in +the meantime, feel free to use perftools even when compiled under MSVC +10. + +== 4 February 2011 == I've just released perftools 1.7 |