summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/manual/stdio.texi
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorUlrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com>1996-11-15 04:08:00 +0000
committerUlrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com>1996-11-15 04:08:00 +0000
commit54d79e995d5a6d0a393ed913b6e26dccc63de5b7 (patch)
treeb758eeac8325f123f161c8d62c5956dc2a6d2556 /manual/stdio.texi
parentb296c233447a37f77ccd9989fce24b45a8db1afa (diff)
downloadglibc-54d79e995d5a6d0a393ed913b6e26dccc63de5b7.tar.gz
update from main archive 961114cvs/libc-961115
Diffstat (limited to 'manual/stdio.texi')
-rw-r--r--manual/stdio.texi66
1 files changed, 46 insertions, 20 deletions
diff --git a/manual/stdio.texi b/manual/stdio.texi
index c666f5e7db..e6e5614930 100644
--- a/manual/stdio.texi
+++ b/manual/stdio.texi
@@ -1943,9 +1943,19 @@ The @var{arginfo-function} is the function called by
template string. @xref{Parsing a Template String}, for information
about this.
-Normally, you install both functions for a conversion at the same time,
-but if you are never going to call @code{parse_printf_format}, you do
-not need to define an arginfo function.
+@c The following is not true anymore. The `parse_printf_format' function
+@c is now also called from `vfprintf' via `parse_one_spec'.
+@c --drepper@gnu, 1996/11/14
+@c
+@c Normally, you install both functions for a conversion at the same time,
+@c but if you are never going to call @code{parse_printf_format}, you do
+@c not need to define an arginfo function.
+
+@strong{Attention:} In the GNU C library version before 2.0 the
+@var{arginfo-function} function did not need to be installed unless
+the user uses the @code{parse_printf_format} function. This changed.
+Now a call to any of the @code{printf} functions will call this
+function when this format specifier appears in the format string.
The return value is @code{0} on success, and @code{-1} on failure
(which occurs if @var{spec} is out of range).
@@ -1995,7 +2005,7 @@ actual value retrieved from the argument list. But the structure passed
to the arginfo function contains a value of @code{INT_MIN}, since the
actual value is not known.
-@item char spec
+@item wchar_t spec
This is the conversion specifier character specified. It's stored in
the structure so that you can register the same handler function for
multiple characters, but still have a way to tell them apart when the
@@ -2028,7 +2038,13 @@ This is a boolean that is true if the @samp{+} flag was specified.
@item unsigned int group
This is a boolean that is true if the @samp{'} flag was specified.
-@item char pad
+@item unsigned int extra
+This flag has a special meaning depending on the context. It could
+be used freely by the user-defined handlers but when called from
+the @code{printf} function this variable always contains the value
+@code{0}.
+
+@item wchar_t pad
This is the character to use for padding the output to the minimum field
width. The value is @code{'0'} if the @samp{0} flag was specified, and
@code{' '} otherwise.
@@ -2042,32 +2058,42 @@ width. The value is @code{'0'} if the @samp{0} flag was specified, and
Now let's look at how to define the handler and arginfo functions
which are passed as arguments to @code{register_printf_function}.
+@strong{Compatibility Note:} The interface change in the GNU libc
+version 2.0. Previously the third argument was of type
+@code{va_list *}.
+
You should define your handler functions with a prototype like:
@smallexample
int @var{function} (FILE *stream, const struct printf_info *info,
- va_list *ap_pointer)
+ const void *const *args)
@end smallexample
-The @code{stream} argument passed to the handler function is the stream to
+The @var{stream} argument passed to the handler function is the stream to
which it should write output.
-The @code{info} argument is a pointer to a structure that contains
+The @var{info} argument is a pointer to a structure that contains
information about the various options that were included with the
conversion in the template string. You should not modify this structure
inside your handler function. @xref{Conversion Specifier Options}, for
a description of this data structure.
-The @code{ap_pointer} argument is used to pass the tail of the variable
-argument list containing the values to be printed to your handler.
-Unlike most other functions that can be passed an explicit variable
-argument list, this is a @emph{pointer} to a @code{va_list}, rather than
-the @code{va_list} itself. Thus, you should fetch arguments by
-means of @code{va_arg (*ap_pointer, @var{type})}.
-
-(Passing a pointer here allows the function that calls your handler
-function to update its own @code{va_list} variable to account for the
-arguments that your handler processes. @xref{Variadic Functions}.)
+@c The following changes some time back. --drepper@gnu, 1996/11/14
+@c
+@c The @code{ap_pointer} argument is used to pass the tail of the variable
+@c argument list containing the values to be printed to your handler.
+@c Unlike most other functions that can be passed an explicit variable
+@c argument list, this is a @emph{pointer} to a @code{va_list}, rather than
+@c the @code{va_list} itself. Thus, you should fetch arguments by
+@c means of @code{va_arg (*ap_pointer, @var{type})}.
+@c
+@c (Passing a pointer here allows the function that calls your handler
+@c function to update its own @code{va_list} variable to account for the
+@c arguments that your handler processes. @xref{Variadic Functions}.)
+
+The @var{args} is a vector of pointers to the arguments data.
+The number of arguments were determined by calling the argument
+information function provided by the user.
Your handler function should return a value just like @code{printf}
does: it should return the number of characters it has written, or a
@@ -2080,11 +2106,11 @@ This is the data type that a handler function should have.
@end deftp
If you are going to use @w{@code{parse_printf_format}} in your
-application, you should also define a function to pass as the
+application, you must also define a function to pass as the
@var{arginfo-function} argument for each new conversion you install with
@code{register_printf_function}.
-You should define these functions with a prototype like:
+You have to define these functions with a prototype like:
@smallexample
int @var{function} (const struct printf_info *info,