diff options
author | Andreas Jaeger <aj@suse.de> | 2000-11-06 07:25:55 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Andreas Jaeger <aj@suse.de> | 2000-11-06 07:25:55 +0000 |
commit | 6abca68dbff1cf5122efe429a82eb73896ab6ef6 (patch) | |
tree | decd09f8d36de1bd1c93506f2558d510a41cdfdf | |
parent | db90e6f1679c9901584592fa71b811e75a8a474c (diff) | |
download | glibc-6abca68dbff1cf5122efe429a82eb73896ab6ef6.tar.gz |
Fixed toc.
-rw-r--r-- | FAQ.in | 8 |
1 files changed, 4 insertions, 4 deletions
@@ -487,7 +487,7 @@ versions of some string functions. These can only be used with GCC. See libc anymore? -Removed. Does not apply anymore. +{} Removed. Does not apply anymore. ?? When I use GNU libc on my Linux system by linking against the libc.so which comes with glibc all I get is a core dump. @@ -1321,7 +1321,7 @@ completely. the Perl db modules the testsuite is not passed. This did not happen with db-1, gdbm, or ndbm. -Removed. Does not apply anymore. +{} Removed. Does not apply anymore. ?? The pow() inline function I get when including <math.h> is broken. I get segmentation faults when I run the program. @@ -1413,7 +1413,7 @@ benchmark program for measuring disk access). ?? Programs compiled with glibc 2.1 can't read db files made with glibc 2.0. What has changed that programs like rpm break? -Removed. Does not apply anymore. +{} Removed. Does not apply anymore. ?? Autoconf's AC_CHECK_FUNC macro reports that a function exists, but when I try to use it, it always returns -1 and sets errno to ENOSYS. @@ -1525,7 +1525,7 @@ and regulations of the country this effects. glibc behaves correctly. ??make I've build make 3.77 against glibc 2.1 and now make gets segmentation faults. -Removed. Does not apply anymore, use make 3.79 or newer. +{} Removed. Does not apply anymore, use make 3.79 or newer. ?? Why do so many programs using math functions fail on my AlphaStation? |