| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
| |
These were introduced in:
<https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ee/merge_requests/645>
|
| |\
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Avoid race condition when expiring artifacts
## What does this MR do?
It may happen that job which purpose is to remove expired artifacts will be executed asynchronously when, in the meantime, project associated with given build gets removed by another async job. In that case we should not remove artifacts because such build will be eventually removed anyway along with artifacts, when project removal is complete.
## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
- [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added
- Tests
- [x] Added for this feature/bug
- [x] All builds are passing
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Closes #22296
See merge request !6881
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
It may happen that job meant to remove expired artifacts will be
executed asynchronously when, in the meantime, project associated with
given build gets removed by another asynchronous job. In that case we
should not remove artifacts because such build will be removed anyway,
when project removal is complete.
|
| |\ \
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Resolve Merge conflicts in editor
## What does this MR do?
This is the second iteration of https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/20344 which now allows to resolve conflicts manually providing an editor to the user.
## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
- Previous implementation has been refactored almost from the ground up.
- Also some components like `parallel-conflict-lines` has been optimized to work well with PhantomJS.
- The app and files required files are loaded only when needed. `merge_conflicts_bundle.js` is only loaded in `/<group>/<project>/merge_requests/<Id>/conflicts` only
## Why was this MR needed?
Some MRs were unable to be solved interactively in the UI, with this MR we let the user to manually fix complex merge request conflicts.
## Screenshots (if relevant)
<img src="/uploads/33a016f025bd590b1fc6eeee1ee11626/Screen_Shot_2016-09-19_at_1.39.39_PM.png" width="800">
## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
- [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added
- [ ] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)
- [ ] API support added
- Tests
- [x] Added for this feature/bug
- [x] All builds are passing
- [ ] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html)
- [ ] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
- [ ] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Closes https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/20344, https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/3567.
See merge request !6374
|
| | |\ \ |
|
| | |\ \ \ |
|
| | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | |
|
| | | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
- Use a store base object to manage application state.
- Add a service to handle ajax requests.
- Load code only when needed
|
| | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | |
|
| | | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
When reading conflicts:
1. Add a `type` field. `text` works as before, and has `sections`;
`text-editor` is a file with ambiguous conflict markers that can only
be resolved in an editor.
2. Add a `content_path` field pointing to a JSON representation of the
file's content for a single file.
3. Hitting `content_path` returns a similar datastructure to the `file`,
but without the `content_path` and `sections` fields, and with a
`content` field containing the full contents of the file (with
conflict markers).
When writing conflicts:
1. Instead of `sections` being at the top level, they are now in a
`files` array. This matches the read format better.
2. The `files` array contains file hashes, each of which must contain:
a. `new_path`
b. `old_path`
c. EITHER `sections` (which works as before) or `content` (with the
full content of the resolved file).
|
| |\ \ \ \ \
| |_|_|_|/
|/| | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
Rename users routing from /u/:username to /users/:username for
consistency with other routes
Renames /u/:username to /users/:username
To follow consistency with other routes (like groups) and
UsersController name.
Now when you can use `/:username` for accessing user page there is no
need in shortcut like `/u/`
See merge request !6851
|
| | | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
Signed-off-by: Dmitriy Zaporozhets <dmitriy.zaporozhets@gmail.com>
|
| | |_|_|/
|/| | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Closes #23423
|
| |\ \ \ \
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
Fix broken specs on MySQL
## What does this MR do?
Fixes broken master after https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/merge_requests/6896
See merge request !6935
|
| | | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/merge_requests/6896
|
| |/ / / / |
|
| |\ \ \ \
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
Add Pipeline metrics worker
## What does this MR do?
Creating a new Merge Request metrics is time consuming, because we need to access repository.
This makes this operation asynchronous, thus non-blocking for updating pipeline.
## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
## Why was this MR needed?
## Screenshots (if relevant)
## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
- [ ] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added
- [ ] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)
- [ ] API support added
- Tests
- [ ] Added for this feature/bug
- [ ] All builds are passing
- [ ] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html)
- [ ] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [ ] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if it does - rebase it please)
- [ ] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
See merge request !6896
|
| | | |_|/
| |/| | |
|
| |\ \ \ \
| |/ / /
|/| | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Add RTL support to Markdown rendering
See merge request !6296
|
| | | | | |
|
| | | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
!6910 changed the filter text from "Filter by branch/tag" to "Filter by Git revision"
|
| | | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Partial fix to #23378
|
| |\ \ \ \
| |/ / /
|/| | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Fix Spinach merge request diff failures
gitlab-git-test `master` was updated in ff076d88, and this caused the merge request diffs to change in a way that broke assumptions in the Spinach tests.
Partial fix to #23378
See merge request !6916
|
| | | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
gitlab-git-test `master` was updated in ff076d88, and this caused
the merge request diffs to change in a way that broke assumptions in the
Spinach tests.
Partial fix to #23378
|
| |/ / /
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Signed-off-by: Dmitriy Zaporozhets <dmitriy.zaporozhets@gmail.com>
|
| |\ \ \ |
|
| | |\ \ \
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
Handle unmatched routing with not_found method
## What does this MR do?
Handle all unmatched routes with 404 method
## Why was this MR needed?
We need this to prevent routing error when user access URL like /123 when there is no resource located under such name.
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Related to https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/23378 and https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/merge_requests/6733.
See merge request !6905
|
| | | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
This reverts commit 68ab7047dae98172a0bd8b92956f2ee51b9167a0.
|
| | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | |
|
| |/ / / /
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
- Tab between register and sign in forms
- Add individual input validation error messages
- Validate username
- Update many styles for all login-box forms
|
| |\ \ \ \
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
Resolve "Build/Pipeline/Environment List Inconsistency Row Height"
#### What does this MR do?
* Changes generic table class from `builds` to `ci-table`. It was getting confusing using `builds` for `builds`, `pipelines`, `environments`
* Sets height on builds rows for continuity
#### Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
Apparently you can't set `min-height` on any `table` elements but you _can_ set `height`. For some reason, even if the content within happens to start wrapping, the row height will grow instead of letting the content overlap. Which is a good thing. Just kind of weird.
#### Why was this MR needed?
Different row heights on builds depending on content
#### Screenshots (if relevant)
Before:
After:
Before:
After:
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Closes #23167
See merge request !6787
|
| | | | | | |
|
| |\ \ \ \ \
| |_|/ / /
|/| | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
Merge request tabs stick when scrolling page
## What does this MR do?
When scrolling merge requests this sticks the tabs to below the navigation for easy access.
## Screenshots (if relevant)
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Closes #20548
See merge request !6382
|
