| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| ... | |
| | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | |
|
| | |_|/ /
|/| | | |
|
| | |/ /
|/| | |
|
| |\ \ \
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Project tools visibility level
## part of #19734
## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
- [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added
- [x] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)
- [x] API support added
- Tests
- [x] Added for this feature/bug
- [x] All builds are passing
- [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
- [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)
See merge request !5606
|
| | | | | |
|
| |\ \ \ \
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
Use JavaScript tooltips for mentions
## What does this MR do?
- use JavaScript tooltips instead of plain title for mentions (issue, merge request, snippet, user, group, commit, commit range, milestone)
## Why was this MR needed?
JavaScript tooltips look nicer and can wrap.
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/merge_requests/5261#note_13106713, fixes #21500
See merge request !5301
|
| | | | | | |
|
| | |/ / /
|/| | | |
|
| |\ \ \ \
| |/ / /
|/| | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Refactor ability.rb into Policies
## What does this MR do?
Factors out `ability.rb` into a new abstraction - the "policy" (stored in `app/policies`). A policy is a class named `#{class_name}Policy` (looked up automatically as needed) that implements `rules` as follows:
``` ruby
class ThingPolicy < BasePolicy
def rules
@user # this is a user to determine abilities for, optionally nil in the anonymous case
@subject # this is the subject of the ability, guaranteed to be an instance of `Thing`
can! :some_ability # grant the :some_ability permission
cannot! :some_ability # ensure that :some_ability is not allowed. this overrides any `can!` that is called before or after
delegate! @subject.other_thing # merge the abilities (can!) and prohibitions (cannot!) from `@subject.other_thing`
can? :some_ability # test whether, so far, :some_ability is allowed
end
def anonymous_rules
# optional. if not implemented `rules` is called where `@user` is nil. otherwise this method is called when `@user` is nil.
end
end
```
See merge request !5796
|
| | | | | |
|
| |/ / / |
|
| | | | |
|
| | |/
|/| |
|
| |\ \
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
'21247-mergerequestscontroller-conflicts-may-fail-with-iso-8859-data' into 'master'
Handle non-UTF-8 conflicts gracefully
## What does this MR do?
If a conflict file isn't in a UTF-8-compatible encoding, we can't resolve it in the UI.
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Closes #21247.
See merge request !5961
|
| | |/
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
These can't be resolved in the UI because if they aren't in a UTF-8
compatible encoding, they can't be rendered as JSON. Even if they could,
we would be implicitly changing the file encoding anyway, which seems
like a bad idea.
|
| |\ \
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Remove gitorious
## What does this MR do?
Remove gitorious as import source
## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
Did I remove everything?
## Why was this MR needed?
This button yielded a 404
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Closes #17062
/cc @JobV
See merge request !5866
|
| | |/ |
|
| |/ |
|
| |\
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Does not halt the GitHub import process when an error occurs
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Fixes #20385
https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/20149
## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
- [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added
- Tests
- [x] All builds are passing
- [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
- [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)
See merge request !5763
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| |/ |
|
| |\
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Fix typo in gitlab-workhorse header
See merge request !5891
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| |\ \
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Do not escape URI when extracting path
## What does this MR do?
- remove escaping of URI parameters after they have already been unescaped in `ExtractsPath`
- remove spec that is relying on that behavior
## Why was this MR needed?
- spaces in directory names were escaped leading to 404 errors on repository files page
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
fixes gitlab-com/support-forum#952, #21106
See merge request !5878
|
| | | | |
|
| | | | |
|
| |\ \ \
| |/ /
|/| |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Fix line commenting for the initial commit
## What does this MR do?
Support line positions on the initial commit, where we can't compare because there's no parent commit.
## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
I chose to use the blank SHA to represent the initial commit, but it could as easily be the same SHA. I just thought this was clearer.
## Why was this MR needed?
People couldn't add line comments to the initial commit!
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Closes #20895.
## Screenshots (if relevant)
## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
- [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added (N/A, regression)
- [x] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md) (N/A)
- [x] API support added (N/A)
- Tests
- [x] Added for this feature/bug
- [x] All builds are passing
- [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
- [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)
See merge request !5900
|
| | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
The initial commit doesn't have a parent, so explicitly pass the blank
SHA and handle that when calculating the position.
|
| |\ \ \
| |/ /
|/| |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Render coverage badge using latest successful pipeline
## What does this MR do?
This MR make test coverage badge to report value for the latest successful pipeline, instead of the latest one, regardless the status.
Latest pipeline is often running, which makes coverage report inaccurate. Latest pipeline can be also the failed one, which may mean that not all stages got processed, therefore coverage report can be inaccurate as well.
This also improves coverage badge performance because it is not necessary to touch repository to get recent SHA on the branch.
## Why was this MR needed?
See #21013
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Closes #21013
## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
- [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added
- [x] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)
- Tests
- [x] Added for this feature/bug
- [x] All builds are passing
- [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
- [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)
See merge request !5862
|
| | |/ |
|
| |\ \
| |/
|/|
| |
| |
| | |
Support slash commands in issues / MR description & comments
See merge request !5021
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| | |\
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
# Conflicts:
# app/services/issues/create_service.rb
|
| | | | |
|
| | | | |
|
| | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
methods
Other improvements:
- Ensure slash commands autocomplete doesn't break when noteable_type is not given
- Slash commands: improve autocomplete behavior and /due command
- We don't display slash commands for note edit forms.
- Add tests for reply by email with slash commands
- Be sure to execute slash commands after the note creation in Notes::CreateService
Signed-off-by: Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>
|
| | | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Signed-off-by: Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>
|
