summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/spec/lib
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* Merge branch 'feature/issues-board' into 'master' Sean McGivern2016-10-131-1/+1
|\ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Refactoring Issues Board ## What does this MR do? This MR aims to minimize conflicts between the CE issues board feature with EE multiple boards feature. ## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check? ## Why was this MR needed? To avoid a lot of conflicts with EE multiple boards feature. ## Screenshots (if relevant) ## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria? - [ ] ~~[CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added~~ - [ ] ~~[Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)~~ - [x] API support added - Tests - [X] Added for this feature/bug - [ ] All builds are passing - [x] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html) - [X] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides) - [ ] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please) - [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits) ## What are the relevant issue numbers? https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ee/issues/929 https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ee/issues/1084 See merge request !6727
| * Add Project#boards to import/export configuration fileDouglas Barbosa Alexandre2016-10-111-1/+1
| |
* | Merge branch '20708-new-branch-is-immediatelly-tagged-as-merged' into 'master' Douwe Maan2016-10-121-4/+4
|\ \ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Removes inconsistency regarding tagging immediately as merged once you create a … - [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added - [x] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md) - [x] API support added - Tests - [x] Added for this feature/bug - [x] All builds are passing - [x] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html) - [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides) - [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please) - [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits) ## What are the relevant issue numbers? Closes #20708 See merge request !6408
| * | refactors tests because of gitlab-test repository changes20708-new-branch-is-immediatelly-tagged-as-mergedtiagonbotelho2016-10-111-4/+4
| | |
* | | Merge branch 'atom-routes' into 'master' Robert Speicher2016-10-111-1/+86
|\ \ \ | |_|/ |/| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Allow browsing branches that end with '.atom' ## What does this MR do? 1. Simplify the regex capture in the routing for the CommitsController to not exclude the '.atom' suffix. That's a perfectly valid git branch name, so we shouldn't blow up if we get it. 2. Because Rails now can't automatically detect the request format, add some code to do so in `ExtractPath` when there is no path. This means that, given branches 'foo' and 'foo.atom', the Atom feed for the former is unroutable. To fix this: don't do that! Give the branches different names! ## Why was this MR needed? Creating a branch or tag name ending in '.atom' would cause some 500s on that repo. ## What are the relevant issue numbers? Closes #21955. Related to !5994. See merge request !6750
| * | Allow browsing branches that end with '.atom'Sean McGivern2016-10-111-1/+86
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | We need to do two things to support this: 1. Simplify the regex capture in the routing for the CommitsController to not exclude the '.atom' suffix. That's a perfectly valid git branch name, so we shouldn't blow up if we get it. 2. Because Rails now can't automatically detect the request format, add some code to do so in `ExtractPath` when there is no path. This means that, given branches 'foo' and 'foo.atom', the Atom feed for the former is unroutable. To fix this: don't do that! Give the branches different names!
* | | HTMLEntityFilter -> HtmlEntityFilterNick Thomas2016-10-101-1/+1
| |/ |/|
* | Use Hash rocket syntax to maintain Ruby 2.1 compatibility in specStan Hu2016-10-081-1/+1
|/
* Merge branch 'memoize_shell_secret_token' into 'master' Rémy Coutable2016-10-071-3/+6
|\ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Memoize Github::Shell's secret token ## What does this MR do? `API::Helpers#secret_token` was reading the secret file on every invocation. This MR reads the file in the `gitlab_shell_secret_token.rb` initializer and saves it as a class variable at `Gitlab::Shell.secret_token` ## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check? - I'm not sure if the use of `cattr_accessor` is the best approach, or if should be moved into the `class << self` block? - Should `API::Helpers#secret_token` be removed in favor of using `Gitlab::Shell.secret_token`? ## Why was this MR needed? Performance optimization. Fixes https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/22510 See merge request !6599
| * Call ensure_secret_token! in secret token test's before block since it would ↵Justin DiPierro2016-10-061-0/+1
| | | | | | | | be called in an initializer.
| * Load Github::Shell's secret token from file on initialization instead of ↵Justin DiPierro2016-10-061-3/+5
| | | | | | | | every request.
* | Enable CacheMarkdownField for the remaining modelsNick Thomas2016-10-071-0/+14
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This commit alters views for the following models to use the markdown cache if present: * AbuseReport * Appearance * ApplicationSetting * BroadcastMessage * Group * Issue * Label * MergeRequest * Milestone * Project At the same time, calls to `escape_once` have been moved into the `single_line` Banzai pipeline, so they can't be missed out by accident and the work is done at save, rather than render, time.
* | Use CacheMarkdownField for notesNick Thomas2016-10-072-41/+24
| |
* | Add markdown cache columns to the database, but don't use them yetNick Thomas2016-10-072-1/+76
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This commit adds a number of _html columns and, with the exception of Note, starts updating them whenever the content of their partner fields changes. Note has a collision with the note_html attr_accessor; that will be fixed later A background worker for clearing these cache columns is also introduced - use `rake cache:clear` to set it off. You can clear the database or Redis caches separately by running `rake cache:clear:db` or `rake cache:clear:redis`, respectively.
* | Merge branch 'fix-already-selected-activity-link' into 'master' Fatih Acet2016-10-061-0/+49
|\ \ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Fix inconsistent highlighting of already selected activity nav-links ## What does this MR do? * Remove edge case where user could deselect an activity nav-link (which seems to be returning all the events) * Explicitly add an `All` tab to return all the events ## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check? Shouldn't be ## Why was this MR needed? Resolves existing UI inconsistency ## Screenshots (if relevant) Before: ![4OzkoQVJYc](/uploads/fd2a7fdbde2159e875482ec7b828fe60/4OzkoQVJYc.gif) After: ![E0lj8UhEUU](/uploads/7eb5155861eb79d72957de04c9f172c9/E0lj8UhEUU.gif) ## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria? - [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added - Tests - [x] All builds are passing - [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides) - [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please) - [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits) ## What are the relevant issue numbers? * Closes #21631 * Closes #21452 See merge request !6091
| * | Fix inconsistent highlighting of already selected activity nav-linksClement Ho2016-10-051-0/+49
| | |
* | | Make user constrainer lookup same as controller and add more constrainer testsDmitriy Zaporozhets2016-10-063-1/+20
| | | | | | | | | | | | Signed-off-by: Dmitriy Zaporozhets <dmitriy.zaporozhets@gmail.com>
* | | Change user & group landing page routing from /u/:name & /groups/:name to /:nameDmitriy Zaporozhets2016-10-061-0/+26
| |/ |/| | | | | Signed-off-by: Dmitriy Zaporozhets <dmitriy.zaporozhets@gmail.com>
* | Use higher size on Gitlab::Redis connection pool on Sidekiq serversPaco Guzman2016-10-061-0/+34
| |
* | Merge branch 'feature/improve-async-pipeline-processing' into 'master' Kamil Trzciński2016-10-061-1/+1
|\ \ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Improve asynchronous pipeline processing ## What does this MR do? This MR improves asynchronous processing of pipeline. ## Why was this MR needed? It eliminates some race conditions and improves performance. ## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria? - [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added - Tests - [x] Added for this feature/bug - [x] All builds are passing ## What are the relevant issue / merge request numbers? Related merge request: !6410 Extracted from !6411 See merge request !6650
| * | Fix pipeline fixtures and calls to removed methodGrzegorz Bizon2016-10-041-1/+1
| | |
* | | Merge remote-tracking branch 'dev/master'Rémy Coutable2016-10-062-0/+159
|\ \ \ | |_|/ |/| |
| * | Merge branch 'fix/id-claim-import-issue' into 'master' Douwe Maan2016-09-302-0/+159
| |\ \ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Prevent claiming associated model IDs via import On the import side, we should be careful not to use any IDs as part of the JSON file that could have been manipulated. Part of https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/20821 Things we already do (__before__ this fix): 1. Remove all primary keys 1. **Always** reassign some of the foreign keys, such as ALL project IDs and user IDs (so it would be difficult to impersonate or try to gain access to another project) 1. Ignore/reject attributes that do not exist in the model 1. If someone reassigns a foreign key `submodel_id`, and that object has another json as the submodel, the new submodel will reassign the `submodel_id` to the newly created submodel ID. Things we should do: 1. Remove/nullify any other foreign keys that we don't reassign (checked this, and there aren't many, fortunately. In fact, I don't think much harm can be done at all - at the moment). See merge request !1985
| | * | Prevent claiming associated model IDs via import and added relevant specsJames Lopez2016-09-272-0/+159
| | | |
* | | | Merge branch 'kradydal/gitlab-ce-20989-disable-all-for-non-project-members'Rémy Coutable2016-10-051-0/+9
|\ \ \ \ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | See !6474.
| * | | | Imrove grammarKatarzyna Kobierska2016-10-031-1/+1
| | | | |
| * | | | Fix test, add author attribute to all testsKatarzyna Kobierska2016-10-031-0/+9
| | |_|/ | |/| |
* | | | Merge branch 'test-improve-gitlab-identifier' into 'master' Rémy Coutable2016-10-051-0/+123
|\ \ \ \ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Refactor Gitlab::Identifier ## What does this MR do? This refactors `Gitlab::Identifier` so that it: 1. Has tests 2. Caches output in an instance variable to reduce queries 3. Uses only a single query to find a user by an SSH key, instead of 2 ## Why was this MR needed? This code was untested and would execute more SQL queries than needed. See merge request !6680
| * | | | Refactor Gitlab::IdentifierYorick Peterse2016-10-051-0/+123
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This refactors Gitlab::Identifier so it uses fewer queries and is actually tested. Queries are reduced by caching the output as well as using 1 query (instead of 2) to find a user using an SSH key.
* | | | | Merge branch 'fix/22225' into 'master' Sean McGivern2016-10-041-2/+22
|\ \ \ \ \ | |/ / / / |/| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Skip wiki creation when GitHub project has wiki enabled ## What does this MR do? When importing a repository from if the repository has wiki, we should not create the default wiki. Otherwise the GitHub importer will fail because the wiki repository already exist. This bug was introduced here https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/commit/892dea67717c0efbd6a28f7639f34535ec0a8747 ## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check? No. ## Why was this MR needed? GitLab fails to import GitHub Wiki. ## Screenshots (if relevant) ## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria? - [X] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added - Tests - [X] Added for this feature/bug - [ ] All builds are passing - [X] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html) - [X] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides) - [ ] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please) - [X] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits) ## What are the relevant issue numbers? Fixes #22225 See merge request !6665
| * | | | Skip wiki creation when GitHub project has wiki enabledDouglas Barbosa Alexandre2016-10-041-2/+22
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | If the GitHub project repository has wiki, we should not create the default wiki. Otherwise the GitHub importer will fail because the wiki repository already exist. This bug was introduced here https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/commit/892dea67717c0efbd6a28f763 9f34535ec0a8747
* | | | | Fixed banzai test failuresPhil Hughes2016-10-041-4/+4
|/ / / /
* | | | Merge branch 'rs-string-conversion-in-interpolation' into 'master' Rémy Coutable2016-10-031-1/+1
|\ \ \ \ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Enable Lint/StringConversionInInterpolation cop and autocorrect offenses See merge request !6654
| * | | | Enable Lint/StringConversionInInterpolation cop and autocorrect offensesrs-string-conversion-in-interpolationRobert Speicher2016-10-031-1/+1
| |/ / /
* | | | Merge branch '22466-task-list-fork' into 'master' Rémy Coutable2016-10-031-16/+0
|\ \ \ \ | |/ / / |/| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Resolve "Task List Checkbox Alignment" ## What does this MR do? Replace the unmaintained `task_list` gem with the `deckar01-task_list` fork ## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check? - I had to pin some dependencies in the fork to support `ruby < 2.2`, which added new version restrictions for 2 existing modules. - I triggered a build after I removed the patch to show the test passed with the new gem, then I removed the test, because this behavior is tested in the gem's repo now. ## Why was this MR needed? - The `task_list` patch was added with a comment that said it should be removed when merged upstream, but the repo got archived, so an upstream patch requires a fork. - #22470 can't be patched without warnings due to the way `task_list` uses Ruby constants. - There are additional outstanding `task_list` bugs that can be fixed once we switch to a fork. ## What are the relevant issue numbers? - #22466 - #22470 - !6487 See merge request !6625
| * | | Remove the task_list test since it is patched upstreamJared Deckard2016-09-301-16/+0
| |/ /
* | | Merge branch ↵Robert Speicher2016-10-022-6/+6
|\ \ \ | |/ / |/| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | '21983-member-add_user-doesn-t-detect-existing-members-that-have-requested-access' into 'master' Resolve "`Member.add_user`doesn't detect existing members that have requested access" ## What does this MR do? This merge request handle the case when an access requester is added to a group or project (via the members page or the API). In `Member.add_user`, if an access requester already exists, we simply accept their request (and set the `created_by`, `access_level` and `expires_at` attributes if given). ## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check? I've taken the opportunity to cleanup the whole `{Group,Project}Member.add_user*` methods since it was quite a mess. ## What are the relevant issue numbers? Closes #21983 See merge request !6393
| * | Allow Member.add_user to handle access requestersRémy Coutable2016-09-282-6/+6
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Changes include: - Ensure Member.add_user is not called directly when not necessary - New GroupMember.add_users_to_group to have the same abstraction level as for Project - Refactor Member.add_user to take a source instead of an array of members - Fix Rubocop offenses - Always use Project#add_user instead of project.team.add_user - Factorize users addition as members in Member.add_users_to_source - Make access_level a keyword argument in GroupMember.add_users_to_group and ProjectMember.add_users_to_projects - Destroy any requester before adding them as a member - Improve the way we handle access requesters in Member.add_user Instead of removing the requester and creating a new member, we now simply accepts their access request. This way, they will receive a "access request granted" email. - Fix error that was previously silently ignored - Stop raising when access level is invalid in Member, let Rails validation do their work Signed-off-by: Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>
* | | Merge branch 'lfs-ssh-authorization-fix' into 'master' Douwe Maan2016-09-282-6/+6
|\ \ \ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Do not regenerate the `lfs_token` every time `git-lfs-authenticate` is called ## What does this MR do? Do not regenerate the `lfs_token` every time `git-lfs-authenticate` is called, instead return the saved token if one is present. This was causing a lot of 401s, leading to 403s, as state in #22527 As it turns out, when pushing a lot of LFS objects, the LFS client was calling `git-lfs-authenticate` in the middle of the request again. This caused the `lfs_token` to be regenerated. The problem lies in that the LFS client was not aware of this change, and was still using the old token. This caused all subsequent requests to fail with a 401 error. Since HTTP Auth is protected by Rack Attack, this 401s where immediately flagged and resulted in the IP of the user being banned. With this change, GitLab returns the value stored in Redis, if one is present, thus if the LFS client calls `git-lfs-authenticate` again during the request, the auth header will remain unchanged, allowing all subsequent requests to continue without issues. ## What are the relevant issue numbers? Fixes #22527 cc @SeanPackham @jacobvosmaer-gitlab See merge request !6551
| * | | Handle LFS token creation and retrieval in the same method, and in the same ↵lfs-ssh-authorization-fixPatricio Cano2016-09-282-6/+6
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Redis connection. Reset expiry time of token, if token is retrieved again before it expires.
* | | | Log LDAP lookup errors and don't swallow unrelated exceptionsMarkus Koller2016-09-281-3/+34
| |/ / |/| | | | | | | | Signed-off-by: Roger Meier <r.meier@siemens.com>
* | | Import all GitHub comments after importing issues and PRsAhmad Sherif2016-09-271-0/+2
| | |
* | | Speed up label-applying process for GitHub importingAhmad Sherif2016-09-271-5/+6
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | * No need to re-fetch issues from GH to read their labels, the labels are already there from the index request. * No need to look up labels on the database for every application, so we cache them.
* | | Process each page of GitHub resources instead of concating them then processingAhmad Sherif2016-09-271-1/+1
|/ / | | | | | | | | This should avoid having large memory growth when importing GitHub repos with lots of resources.
* | fix model order in import/export config and 1to1 relation issue. Added ↵James Lopez2016-09-272-1/+43
|/ | | | relevant specs.
* added more specsJames Lopez2016-09-261-1/+1
|
* Fixes issue with rails reserved keyword type exporting/importing services. ↵James Lopez2016-09-263-0/+12
| | | | Also fixed CustomIssueTrackerService title setter and added relevant specs.
* Merge branch '22229-use-base-sha-when-downloading-merge-requests' into 'master' Robert Speicher2016-09-251-3/+37
|\ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Use base SHA for patches and diffs ## What does this MR do? Switch from using 'start SHA' to 'base SHA' for patches and diffs ## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check? ## Why was this MR needed? Makes the downloaded patches and diffs on the merge request page match the frontend-rendered "changes" in these scenarios: * Unpatched gitlab-workhorse, downloading patchsets of open MRs (https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-workhorse/merge_requests/68) * Unpatched gitlab-workhorse, downloading diffs of open and merged MRs * Patched gitlab-workhorse, downloading patchsets of merged merge requests ## What are the relevant issue numbers? Closes #22229 See merge request !6435
| * Use base SHA for patches and diffsNick Thomas2016-09-221-3/+37
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | This commit changes the revisions used for diffs. The current behaviour is to show all changes between current tip of master and tip of the MR, rather than matching the output of the web frontend (which just shows the changes in the MR). Switching from start_sha to base_sha fixes this.
* | Make Gitlab::Redis.params safe for mutationJacob Vosmaer2016-09-221-7/+45
| |