| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |\
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Clean up globals exemptions within .eslintrc
## What does this MR do?
Removes unnecessarily-exempted globals from `.eslintrc` where possible.
## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
`npm run eslint` should return 0 errors.
## Why was this MR needed?
see Issue #24756
## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
- Tests
- [x] All builds are passing
- [x] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html)
- [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if it does - rebase it please)
- [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Closes #24756
See merge request !7642
|
| | | |
|
| |/ |
|
| |\
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Backport SmartInterval, PrettyTime, SubbableResource from EE.
## What does this MR do?
Backports infrastructure used for EE-only Timetracking so it can be used and improved upon in CE.
This doesn't really need review... it was already reviewed and merged in EE.
There are no side effects or conflicts, just three new classes added:
1. `SubbableResource` -- pubsub for ajax resources
2. `SmartInterval`-- for configurable polling
3. `PrettyTime` -- time parsing and formatting utility methods
- [x] Added for this feature/bug
- [x] All builds are passing
- [x] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html)
- [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if it does - rebase it please)
- [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ee/issues/985
https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ee/merge_requests/870
cc: @jschatz1
See merge request !7573
|
| | | |
|
| |\ \
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Resolve "Activity entries are not loaded fully to cover full window's height"
## What does this MR do?
Fixes a bug in which a browser window large enough to encompass the default number of items in an auto-loading endless-scroll list could not trigger the loading of additional items.
## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
I refactored activities.js and pager.js into es6 syntax while I was investigating the issue. No changes were made other than some es6 flourishes and eslint conformity, so nothing should be effected, but perhaps best to double check other pages which utilize these scripts.
## Screenshots (if relevant)
## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
- [x] [Changelog entry](https://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/changelog.html) added
- Tests
- [x] All builds are passing
- [x] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html)
- [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if it does - rebase it please)
- [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Closes #24499
See merge request !7608
|
| | | | |
|
| |\ \ \
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Remove v-html
## What does this MR do?
Uses string interpolation instead of `v-html` to prevent xss attacks.
## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
- [ ] [Changelog entry](https://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/changelog.html) added
- [ ] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)
- [ ] API support added
- Tests
- [ ] Added for this feature/bug
- [ ] All builds are passing
- [x] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html)
- [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if it does - rebase it please)
- [ ] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
See merge request !7616
|
| | |/ / |
|
| |/ / |
|
| |\ \
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Fix broken merge request widget spec
## What does this MR do?
Converts the invalid es6 syntax of the merge_request_widget_spec which is actually causing the spec not to run through teaspoon
## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
None
## Why was this MR needed?
Get specs working again
## Screenshots (if relevant)
None
## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
- [ ] [Changelog entry](https://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/changelog.html) added
- [ ] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)
- [ ] API support added
- Tests
- [ ] Added for this feature/bug
- [ ] All builds are passing
- [ ] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html)
- [ ] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [ ] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if it does - rebase it please)
- [ ] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Closes #24673
See merge request !7594
|
| | |/ |
|
| |\ \
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Resolve "Display "folders" for environments"
## What does this MR do?
Adds the ability to show the grouped environments inside "folders".
Adds several reusable vue components in order to accomplish the recursive tree data structure presented.
For the individual components, Jasmine tests were added.
For the ones that depend of an API response, rspec tests are used.
## Screenshots (if relevant)
## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
- [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG.md) entry added
- [ ] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)
- [ ] API support added
- Tests
- [x] Added for this feature/bug
- [ ] All builds are passing
- [x] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html)
- [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if it does - rebase it please)
- [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Closes #22539
See merge request !7015
|
| | | | |
|
| | | | |
|
| | | | |
|
| | | | |
|
| | | | |
|
| | | | |
|
| | |\ \
| | |/
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
* master: (154 commits)
Fix typos
Fix wrong changelog item
Add missing item for 8.13.6
Change last_used_at to use touch
Add chat_name partial
Mention Git strategy none
Fix code review
adds fix for security issue when annonymous user does not ...
Remove ToC since it's now supported in the docs portal itself
Add 8.14 to versions with further additions to review apps
Add Limitations sections to environments and review apps docs
Add link to environments docs
Fix URL to review apps docs
Add a prerequisites section, add some links
Link to NGINX example project for the time being
Get rid most of the irrelevant sections
Add note about current limitation in $CI_BUILD_REF_NAME
Add an intro and an Overview section for Review Apps
WIP review apps
Add Review apps link to CI README
...
Conflicts:
spec/features/environments_spec.rb
|
| | | | |
|
| | | | |
|
| | | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Remove unused method
|
| | | | |
|
| | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Improves documentation
Adds tests
Fix prop validation for objects
Finish tests for environment item
Adds tests for toggle folder function
Environment tests
Adds tests
|
| | | | |
|
| | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Adds tests.
Changes instance into a constructor
Adds tests for environments component
Adds tests assertations
Adds external URL test
Adds tests for Rollback component
Adds tests for stop component
Adds tests for actions component
Fix environment item
Init environment item tests
|
| | | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Adds commit component
|
| | | | |
|
| | | | |
|
| | | | |
|
| | | | |
|
| | | | |
|
| | | | |
|
| | | | |
|
| | |/
|/| |
|
| |/ |
|
| |\
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Improved build page scroll UX
## What does this MR do?
This MR smoothes the UX of the builds page by more effectively affixing the scroll step buttons.
It also ensures the scroll step buttons are always in view, even if the sidemenu is open.
It also moves the autoscroll button into the same container as the scroll buttons.
## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
## Why was this MR needed?
The build scroll buttons are always in unpredictable places and are often hidden behind sidemenus.
## Screenshots (if relevant)
## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
- [ ] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added
- [ ] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)
- [ ] API support added
- Tests
- [ ] Added for this feature/bug
- [ ] All builds are passing
- [x] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html)
- [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
- [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Contributes #21832
See merge request !6270
|
| | | |
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Move comments to the correct location
Remove array extension usage
Move build options to fixture to match view
|
| |\ \
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Replace jQuery.timeago with timeago.js
## What does this MR do?
Replaces jQuery.timeago with [timeago.js](https://github.com/hustcc/timeago.js)
## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
* Check to make sure its working everywhere :smile:
* Check to make sure the timeago wording matches what we have now (I think I've got this down but an extra pair of :eyes: would help too)
## Why was this MR needed?
* The jQuery.timeago version we have is outdated
* timeago.js is smaller (7.19 KB => 4.52 KB)
* timeago.js has no jQuery dependency
* removes all inline javascript :crossed_swords: for timeago
## Screenshots (if relevant)
None
## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
- [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added
- Tests
- [x] All builds are passing
- [x] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html)
- [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
- [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Closes #21793
See merge request !6274
|
| | | | |
|
| |\ \ \
| |/ /
|/| |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Move Ajax interceptor into describe block
## What does this MR do?
Move registering the Vue resource interceptor for issue board mock data into the corresponding `describe` blocks.
## Why was this MR needed?
Currently, the interceptor is registered for every test (which makes them at best fail for Ajax calls using Vue resource).
See merge request !7304
|
| | |/ |
|
| |/ |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
