| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
| |
|
|\
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Fix wiki headeline linking
Fixes #21817
See merge request !6300
|
| | |
|
|\ \
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Fix Gitlab::Popen.popen thread-safety issue
## What does this MR do?
It changes the instance variables of `Gitlab::Popen.popen` to a local ones.
## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
N/A
## Why was this MR needed?
It fixes a bug!
## Screenshots (if relevant)
N/A
## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
- [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added
- [ ] ~~[Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)~~
- [ ] ~~API support added~~
- Tests
- [ ] ~~Added for this feature/bug~~
- [x] All builds are passing
- [x] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html)
- [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
- [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
#21842
See merge request !6194
|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Fixes #21842
|
|\ \ \
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Allow trailing newline in secret base64 data
Fixes https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/omnibus-gitlab/issues/1575
See merge request !6327
|
| | |/
| |/| |
|
|\ \ \
| |_|/
|/| |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Use `haml_lint` for views linting
## What does this MR do?
Add HAML-linting to the GitLab codebase.
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Closes #19984.
See merge request !6307
|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Signed-off-by: Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>
|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Signed-off-by: Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>
|
|\ \ \
| |_|/
|/| |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Change response for /ci/api/v1/builds/register.json from 404 to 204
## What does this MR do?
To check if there are new builds scheduled for a runner, runner is sending `POST /ci/api/v1/builds/register.json` requests. If there is a build then a `200` response with build data is returned. However if there is no builds scheduled for this runner it receives a `404 Not Found` response. This may end with a lot of `404 Not Found` lines in logs that are an expected behavior (please read #14445 for a reference).
Since `v1.0.1` version GitLab Runner is ready to receive a `204 No Content` response in case of no builds.
This MR adds a support for this status code for each Runner's version that can be determined while handling `POST /ci/api/v1/builds/register.json` request.
## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
Specs in `spec/requests/ci/api/builds_spec.rb`
## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
- [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added
- [x] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)
- [ ] ~~API support added~~
- Tests
- [x] Added for this feature/bug
- [x] All builds are passing
- [ ] ~~Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html)~~
- [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
- [ ] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Fixes #14445
See merge request !6225
|
| | | |
|
|\ \ \
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Update gitlab shell secret file also when it is empty
Use `File.size?` instead of `File.exist?` so that secret token is
generated when the file is empty.
See merge request !3774
|
| | |/
| |/| |
|
|\ \ \
| |_|/
|/| |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Import GitHub release notes
## Why was this MR needed?
Release notes aren't currently migrated over when importing from GitHub
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
#20780
See merge request !5981
|
| |/
| |
| |
| |
| | |
# Conflicts:
# lib/gitlab/github_import/importer.rb
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
GitlabShell verify access sending ‘_any’ as the changes made on the git command, in those cases Gitlab::Checks::ChangeAccess won’t receive a branch_name so we don’t need to check for access to the
protected branches on that repository. So we avoid some git operations in case the are not cached (empty_repo?) and some database lookups to get protected branches.
These request is happening in every push.
|
|\ \
| |/
|/|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Fix an error where we were unable to create a CommitStatus for running state
Due to severe refactoring of Pipeline we introduced regression in how CommitStatus is handled. We received an report that it's impossible to create a CommitStatus with state `running` when there were not previous status.
The support for Commit Statuses should be simplified. Right now I'm doing minimal change to move forward and fix a bug, but I'll create a new MR that will move all logic that is now part of `lib/api/commit_statuses.rb` to separate service to simplify the implementation.
This error happens due to the fact that we introduced additional status of builds: `created`.
Fixes https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/21345
See merge request !6107
|
| | |
|
|\ \
| |/
|/|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Only add original author tag line when importing from GitHub if there isn't a linked GitLab account
## What does this MR do?
If there we've found a linked GitLab user for a creator of an issue or comment don't add the 'Created By:' line.
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Closes #21569
See merge request !6081
|
| | |
|
|\ \
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
'master'
API: Use Search::GlobalService in projects search API
See merge request !6280
|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Also streamline the sorting part while we're at it.
That being done, there's currently a duplication between
`GET /projects/search/:query` and `GET /projects?search=:search`
so we might want to keep only the latter for 9.0...
Signed-off-by: Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>
|
| | | |
|
|\ \ \
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Fix API issues sorting
## What does this MR do?
Fix the sorting of issues in the API.
## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
Instead of removing the '_at' suffix manually, we could add those versions to the `Sortable` concern instead.
## Why was this MR needed?
There were a couple of bugs:
* The global and project-specific issues endpoints wouldn't sort at all.
* Group sorting would work, but only if you applied two undocumented workarounds:
* Always pass both `order_by` and `sort` (both are optional, so only one should be needed to change ordering).
* Instead of passing `created_at` or `updated_at`, you needed to pass `created` or `updated`.
This makes the API implementation match the docs.
## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
- [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added
- [x] API support added
- Tests
- [x] Added for this feature/bug
- [ ] All builds are passing
- [x] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html)
- [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
- [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Closes https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ee/issues/983.
See merge request !6281
|
| |/ / |
|
|\ \ \
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Add notification_settings API calls
## What does this MR do?
It adds API calls to get/update notification settings, globally and at the group/project level.
## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
None
## Why was this MR needed?
Notification settings were updated, but related API calls were never created.
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
gitlab-org/gitlab-ce#19359
## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
- [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added
- [x] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)
- [x] API support added
- Tests
- [x] Added for this feature/bug
- [x] All builds are passing
- [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
- [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)
Closes #19359
See merge request !5632
|
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Use NotificationSetting::EMAIL_EVENTS for params
|
|\ \ \ \
| |/ / /
|/| | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Restrict ldap return attributes
## What does this MR do?
Fixes the CE part of #13821. We really only ever need uid, dn, cn, and mail attributes, and in some cases, even less. This merge request strips the request down to those four attributes by default, and allows the caller to specify others, if needed.
## Why was this MR needed?
This will improve performance especially in cases where the connection is slow between GitLab and LDAP, or when the LDAP object has lots of attributes we don't care about.
See merge request !6187
|
| | | | |
|
| |/ /
|/| | |
|
|\ \ \
| |/ /
|/| |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Security and safety improvements for gitlab-workhorse integration
Companion to https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-workhorse/merge_requests/60
- Use a custom content type when sending data to gitlab-workhorse
- Verify (using JWT and a shared secret on disk) that internal API requests came from gitlab-workhorse
This will allow us to build features in gitlab-workhorse that require
more trust, and protect us against programming mistakes in the future.
This is designed so that no action is required for installations from
source. For omnibus-gitlab we need to add code that manages the shared
secret.
See merge request !5907
|
| | | |
|
|\ \ \
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Smartly calculate real running time and pending time
## What does this MR do?
Try to smartly calculate the running time and pending time for pipelines, instead of just use wall clock time from start to end. The algorithm is based on:
> Suppose we have A, B, and C jobs:
> * A: from 1 to 3
> * B: from 2 to 4
> * C: from 6 to 7
> The processing time should be accumulated from 1 to 4, and 6 to 7, totally 4, excluding retires, and calculate on `%w[success failed running canceled]` jobs (if a job is not finished yet, assume it's `Time.now`)
## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
I would actually like to test `Gitlab::Ci::PipelineDuration#process_segments`, but it's a private method right now and it's not very convenient to test it. Is there a way to test it without changing the original code too much? Note that I would like to avoid saving merged segments because it's not used and should be garbage collected.
## Screenshots:

## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
- [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added
- [ ] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)
- Tests
- [x] Added for this feature/bug
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Closes #18260, #19804
See merge request !6084
|
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/merge_requests/6084#note_15091858
|
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Feedback:
https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/merge_requests/6084#note_15083507
|
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
feedback:
https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/merge_requests/6084#note_14995016
|
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/merge_requests/6084#note_14991226
and
https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/merge_requests/6084#note_14994233
|
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/merge_requests/6084#note_14992064
|
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/merge_requests/6084#note_14991392
|
| | | | |
|
| | | | |
|
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
real pending time, because that's actually by definition,
(the time that it's not running!)
or we could end up with awfully complicated algorithm :(
|
| |\ \ \
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
* upstream/master: (289 commits)
Fix a typo
Change minimum Unicorns required to two
Update memory requirements
Change the inline code to codeblocks for the new features doc guideline
Update CHANGELOG with 8.11.4 entries.
removed null return - renamed 'placeTop' to 'placeProfileAvatarsToTop'
Change widths of content in MR pipeline tab
Add curve to generic commit status pipeline
Rubocop syntax 2.3
Some minor updates for upgrade guides for 8.12.
Remove inconsistent font weight for sidebar's labels
Replace play icon font with svg
Project tools visibility level
Added todo filter tests
Fixed project filtering
Review changes, simplified dropdown init
Removed select2 from todos feature spec
Removed inline JS and improved dropdown labels
Added type and action dropdowns, need to finalize by removing all inline and polishing off the selected dropdown states
Completed project filter dropdown, still need to move it from inline to ProjectSelect.js (or different)
...
|
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
retries and probably also manual actions!
Feedback:
* https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/merge_requests/6084#note_14735478
* https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/merge_requests/6084#note_14737804
|
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/merge_requests/6084#note_14754681
|
| | | | | |
|
| | | | | |
|
| | | | | |
|
| | | | | |
|