| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |\
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Fix couple of GitHub importing bugs
Fix a bug in GH comment importing and label applying for imported MRs.
See merge request !7139
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| |\ \
| |/
|/| |
|
| | | |
|
| |\ \
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Backups fail occasionally with "tar: ./objects: file changed as we read it" error
- [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added
- [x] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)
- [x] API support added
- Tests
- [x] Added for this feature/bug
- [x] All builds are passing
- [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
- [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)
Closes #5613
See merge request !5814
|
| | | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
only.
|
| |\ \ \
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Add ESLint
## What does this MR do?
- create `package.json`
- add ESLint dependencies to `package.json`
- add JavaScript linting to CI
- add Rake task `lint:javascript`as alias for `eslint` (which itself is an alias for `npm run eslint`)
## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
Probably not.
## Why was this MR needed?
My hovercraft was full of eels.
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
- https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/13224#note_12537431
- https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/merge_requests/5006#note_13255658
See merge request !5445
|
| | |/ / |
|
| | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
control flow.
When adding a deploy key that already exists in the project the existing key would not be returned, resulting in an attempt to create a new one, which in turn caused a 500 error due to an ActiveRecord exception.
When adding a deploy key that exists within another project the key would be joined to the project, but would also attempt to create a new one, which resulted in a 400 error due to the key already existing.
Fixes #22741
Fixes #21754
Signed-off-by: Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>
|
| |\ \ \
| |/ /
|/| |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Grapify tags API
## What does this MR do?
Add the Grape-DSL to the tags API.
## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
The delete endpoint only has a description but no success entity because we don't have one. We only return the branch name as JSON. Should I do something else?
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Related to #22928
See merge request !6860
|
| | | | |
|
| |\ \ \
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Fix events order in users/:id/events endpoint
## What does this MR do?
Order of events in contributions API is currently being lost, though docs are saying:
> Get the contribution events for the specified user, sorted **from newest to oldest**.
Order becomes different after `.merge(ProjectsFinder.new.execute(current_user))` call, so I moved ordering below this line.
This MR also removes extra `.page(params[:page])` call in the method chain, since [`paginate(events)` already does it](https://gitlab.com/airat/gitlab-ce/blob/master/lib/api/helpers.rb#L112).
See merge request !7039
|
| | | | | |
|
| | | | | |
|
| | |_|/
|/| |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
This changes ProjectCacheWorker.perform_async so it only schedules a job
when no lease for the given project is present. This ensures we don't
end up scheduling hundreds of jobs when they won't be executed anyway.
|
| |\ \ \
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Change the approach to check if patches apply cleanly
Closes #23372
See merge request !6949
|
| | | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Signed-off-by: Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>
|
| | | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Signed-off-by: Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>
|
| | | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Signed-off-by: Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>
|
| | | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Signed-off-by: Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>
|
| | |/ /
|/| | |
|
| |\ \ \
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Grapify the labels API
Add the Grape-DSL to the labels API. Since the input validation messages are checked, two tests are modified slightly.
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Related to #22928
See merge request !7070
|
| | | | | |
|
| |\ \ \ \
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
Grapify builds API
## What does this MR do?
Add the Grape-DSL to the builds API.
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Related to #22928
The artifacts API directly downloads a file rather then returning a JSON entity.
See merge request !6877
|
| | |/ / / |
|
| | | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Signed-off-by: Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>
|
| |\ \ \ \
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
Fix branch protection API.
## What does this MR do?
- Fixes the branch protection API.
- Closes #21513
- EE Merge Request: gitlab-org/gitlab-ee!718
## Tasks
- [ ] #21513 !6215 Protected branches API bug
- [x] Investigate
- [x] Test + Fix
- [x] Changelog
- [x] MR
- [x] Wait for build to pass
- [x] Review
- [x] Check for EE conflicts
- [x] Create EE MR
- [x] Refactor + Fix
- [x] Rebase EE MR against EE master
- [x] Wait for builds to pass
- [x] Assign to dbalexandre/douwe
- [x] Implement latest review comments
- [x] Wait for Douwe's review
- [x] Implement changes
- [x] Port changes to EE MR
- [x] Assign both back to Douwe
- [ ] Wait for merge
- [ ] Merge gitlab-org/gitlab-ee!718
See merge request !6215
|
| | | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
- Pass `developers_and_merge` and `developers_can_push` in `params`
instead of using keyword arguments.
- Refactor a slightly complex boolean check to a simple `nil?` check.
|
| | | | | | |
|
| | |/ / /
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
1. Previously, we were not removing existing access levels before
creating new ones. This is not a problem for EE, but _is_ for CE,
since we restrict the number of access levels in CE to 1.
2. The correct approach is:
CE -> delete all access levels before updating a protected branch
EE -> delete developer access levels if "developers_can_{merge,push}" is switched off
3. The dispatch is performed by checking if a "length: 1" validation is
present on the access levels or not.
4. Another source of problems was that we didn't put multiple queries in
a transaction. If the `destroy_all` passes, but the `update` fails,
we should have a rollback.
5. Modifying the API to provide users direct access to CRUD access
levels will make things a lot simpler.
6. Create `create/update` services separately for this API, which
perform the necessary data translation, before calling the regular
`create/update` services. The translation code was getting too large
for the API endpoint itself, so this move makes sense.
|
| |/ / /
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Signed-off-by: Dmitriy Zaporozhets <dmitriy.zaporozhets@gmail.com>
|
| |\ \ \
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Fix error in generating labels
Attempting to generate default set of labels would result in
an error:
ArgumentError: wrong number of arguments (given 1, expected 0)
Closes #23649
See merge request !7055
|
| | |/ /
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Attempting to generate default set of labels would result in
an error:
ArgumentError: wrong number of arguments (given 1, expected 0)
Closes #23649
|
| |\ \ \
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Stop clearing the database cache on rake cache:clear
See merge request !7056
|
| | |/ / |
|
| |/ / |
|
| |\ \
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
'12622-backup-restore-doesn-t-clear-cache-resulting-in-missing-branches-and-tags' into 'master'
Fix: Backup restore doesn't clear cache
## What does this MR do?
Clears cache when we do backup restoring. Fixes https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/12622
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/12622
See merge request !7019
|
| | | | |
|
| | | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Signed-off-by: Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>
|
| |\ \ \
| |/ /
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
preserve-note_type-and-position
* upstream/master:
Restrict ProjectCacheWorker jobs to one per 15 min
Removed code from project members controller
Make label API spec independent of order
Refactoring find_commits functionality
Differentiate the expire from leave event
Remove pagination description from individual doc
Fix a broken table in Project API doc
Create project feature when project is created
Simpler arguments passed to named_route on toggle_award_url helper method
Fixed height of issue board blank state
|
| | |\ \
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Refactoring find_commits method
It's possible that `find_commits_by_message` return nil in array which is not OK. We have different checks outside of this method. This MR places all checks inside the method.
See merge request !7000
|
| | | | | |
|
| | | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
At the moment we cannot see weather a user left a project due to their
membership expiring of if they themselves opted to leave the project.
This adds a new event type that allows us to make this differentiation.
Note that is not really feasable to go back and reliably fix up the
previous events. As a result the events for previous expire removals
will remain the same however events of this nature going forward will be
correctly represented.
|
| |/ / /
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Closes #23208
|
| |\ \ \
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Add group level labels
## What does this MR do?
Add group level labels.
## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
* `LabelsFinder`
* `Gitlab::Gfm::ReferenceRewriter`
* `Banzai::Filter::LabelReferenceFilter`
## Why was this MR needed?
We'll be adding more feature that allow you to do cross-project management of issues.
## Screenshots (if relevant)
* Group Labels
* Project Labels
* Expanded references for group labels when moving issue to another project
## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
- [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added
- [ ] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)
- [x] API support added
- Tests
- [x] Added for this feature/bug
- [ ] All builds are passing
- [ ] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html)
- [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [ ] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
- [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
#19997
See merge request !6425
|
