| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| | |
|
| |\
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Fix StrongAttibutes error with Ruby 2.1
Closes #24730
See merge request !7625
|
| | |
| |
| |
| | |
Signed-off-by: Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>
|
| |\ \
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Improve deploy message
## What does this MR do?
Improves deploy message to make it more descriptive and useable then what is already offered by deploy command.
## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
- [ ] [Changelog entry](https://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/changelog.html) added
- [ ] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)
- [ ] API support added
- Tests
- [ ] Added for this feature/bug
- [ ] All builds are passing
- [ ] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html)
- [ ] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [ ] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if it does - rebase it please)
- [ ] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
See merge request !7629
|
| | | | |
|
| |\ \ \
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Fix 500 error when group name ends with git
Closes https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/support-forum/issues/1298
Closes https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/24742
See merge request !7630
|
| | | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Signed-off-by: Dmitriy Zaporozhets <dmitriy.zaporozhets@gmail.com>
|
| |\ \ \ \
| | |/ /
| |/| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Add deploy chat command
This adds a new ChatOps command:
```
/trigger deploy <environment> to <environment>
```
See merge request !7619
|
| | | | | |
|
| | | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
environment to second one
|
| | |/ / |
|
| |\ \ \
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Send registry address with build payload
## What does this MR do?
Adds `registry_url` as a part of a build payload, when sending a response to a GitLab Runner which requested a new build.
## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
Change in `lib/ci/api/entities.rb`.
## Why was this MR needed?
This is one of the steps needed to add support for private/protected registries hosted with GitLab CE/EE.
## Screenshots (if relevant)
## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
- [x] [Changelog entry](https://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/changelog.html) added
- [ ] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)
- [x] API support added
- Tests
- [x] Added for this feature/bug
- [ ] All builds are passing
- [ ] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html)
- [ ] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [ ] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if it does - rebase it please)
- [ ] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Related to gitlab-org/gitlab-ci-multi-runner#1828, gitlab-org/gitlab-ci-multi-runner!386, gitlab-org/gitlab-ci-multi-runner#1434
See merge request !7474
|
| | | | | |
|
| | | | | |
|
| | | | | |
|
| |\ \ \ \
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
Grapify the projects snippet API
Related to https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/22928
See merge request !7621
|
| | | | | | |
|
| |\ \ \ \ \
| |_|_|_|/
|/| | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
Smarter cache invalidation
Fixes https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/23550
See merge request !7360
|
| | | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
This moves the logic of detecting special repository files (e.g. a
README or a Koding configuration file) to a single class:
Gitlab::FileDetector. Moving this logic into a single place allows this
to be re-used more easily.
This commit also changes Repository#gitlab_ci_yaml so that its cached
similar to other data (e.g. the Koding configuration file).
|
| |\ \ \ \ \
| |_|/ / /
|/| | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
Added permissions per stage to cycle analytics endpoint
See merge request !7613
|
| | | | | | |
|
| | |/ / / |
|
| |\ \ \ \
| |_|_|/
|/| | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Grapify the users API
Certain endpoints return different entities based on which user issues the request. Right now, I am not aware how to specify multiple entities as part of the description block of the endpoint. @rymai Do you know something about that.
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Related to #22928
See merge request !7147
|
| | | | | |
|
| |\ \ \ \
| |_|/ /
|/| | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Add API endpoint for creating a pipeline
Fixes #23468
See merge request !7209
|
| | | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Add a new endpoint in the new API for creating a new pipeline, and return the details of that pipeline.
|
| |\ \ \ \
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
Make job script a required configuration entry
## What does this MR do?
This MR makes a job script a required configuration entry.
## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
- [x] [Changelog entry](https://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/changelog.html) added
- Tests
- [x] Added for this feature/bug
- [x] All builds are passing
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Closes #24575
See merge request !7566
|
| | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | |
|
| |\ \ \ \ \
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Fix faulty deployment refs
In the 8.13 RC cycle, so before the release, there was a time in which
references in git where stored by id instead of iid. This could be fixed
by time, if the iid catches up with the id, it overwrites it. But in the
mean time we have wrong refs in the folder.
This commit fixes that. For all projects we have deployments we'll find
the ones where the ref has a higher number than the iid is now and calls
`#create_ref` on the corresponding deployment.
Fixes gitlab-com/infrastructure#683
cc @ayufan
One worry: I tested this locally, couldn't find a way to do automate this.
See merge request !7352
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
In the 8.13 RC cycle, so before the release, there was a time in which
references in git where stored by id instead of iid. This could be fixed
by time, if the iid catches up with the id, it overwrites it. But in the
mean time we have wrong refs in the folder.
This commit fixes that. For all projects we have deployments we'll find
the ones where the ref has a higher number than the iid is now and calls
`#create_ref` on the corresponding deployment.
|
| |\ \ \ \ \ \
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
Precalculate authorized projects in database
## What does this MR do?
It caches user's authorized projects in database instead of using multiple unions, which should simplify and speed-up things since this operation (getting authorized projects) is used a lot.
## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
Did we miss a scenario where we need to refresh the list of projects?
## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
- [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added
- [ ] ~~[Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)~~
- [ ] ~~API support added~~
- Tests
- [x] Added for this feature/bug
- [x] All builds are passing
- [x] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html)
- [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if it does - rebase it please)
- [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
#23150
See merge request !6839
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
Closes #23150
|
| |\ \ \ \ \ \ \
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Slash command for mattermost
Closes #22540
## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
- [x] [Changelog entry](https://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/changelog.html) added
- [ ] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)
- Tests
- [x] Added for this feature/bug
- [x] All builds are passing
- [x] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html)
- [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if it does - rebase it please)
See merge request !7438
|
| | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
This prevents leakage of project names on an endpoint which is
unauthenticated and thus open to the world.
|
| | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |\ \ \ \ \ \ \ |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
[ci skip]
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
This is the structure Kamil proposed, which leaves us with a bunch of
smaller classes. This commits deletes outdated files and tests
everything from the SlashCommandService and down (child classes and
subcommands)
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Now, each subcommand has its own service, plus I've introduced
presenters to be able to delegate the generation of the views.
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
them [ci skip]
|
| |\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
add parsing support for incoming html email
## What does this MR do?
Fixes #18388 by adding support for parsing HTML email
## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
The new class, Gitlab::Email::HTMLParser, which needs to translate the HTML content to text and also delete replies, as they are not necessarily in the correct format to be caught by EmailReplyParser. The solution I found that should work for any HTML-formatted email is to remove all `<table>` and `<blockquote>` tags. Actual `<table>` elements (to be interpreted by markdown) should already be encoded with e.g. `<table>` - the only failure mode is if there is an *actual* HTML table in the content itself, which we wouldn't be able to support easily anyways.
The gem `html2text` traverses the HTML tree and outputs text - and markdown in the case of HTML links or images.
See merge request !7397
|
