| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
... | |
|\ \ \ \ \ \
| |/ / / / / |
|
| |\ \ \ \ \
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
'21508-inconsistency-personal-dashboard-todos-page-uses-old-interface-wrong-dropdown-filter-buttons' into 'master'
Update todo view filter dropdowns
## What does this MR do?
Swaps out old `select2` dropdowns on todo page with newer dropdowns.
Also removes todo inline JS.
## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
## Why was this MR needed?
## Screenshots (if relevant)
### Project

### Author

### Type

### Action

## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
- [ ] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added
- [ ] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)
- [ ] API support added
- Tests
- [ ] Added for this feature/bug
- [ ] All builds are passing
- [ ] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [ ] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
- [ ] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Closes #21508
Related to #19866
See merge request !6072
|
| | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | |
|
| |/ / / / / |
|
| | |_|_|/
| |/| | | |
|
|\ \ \ \ \
| |/ / / / |
|
| |\ \ \ \
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Capitalize mentioned issue timeline notes
## What does this MR do?
Renames `mentioned in` to `Mentioned in` for issue timeline notes
## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
Shouldn't be any :smile:
## Why was this MR needed?
Resolves existing UI inconsistency as all the other issue timeline notes have their first letter capitalized.
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Closes #21416
## Screenshots (if relevant)
Before:

After:

## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
- [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added
- Tests
- [x] All builds are passing
- [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
- [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)
See merge request !6028
|
| | | |_|/
| | |/| | |
|
| |\ \ \ \
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Remove gitorious
## What does this MR do?
Remove gitorious as import source
## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
Did I remove everything?
## Why was this MR needed?
This button yielded a 404
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Closes #17062
/cc @JobV
See merge request !5866
|
| | |/ / / |
|
| |\ \ \ \
| | |/ / /
| |/| | | |
|
| | |\ \ \
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Signed-off-by: Dmitriy Zaporozhets <dmitriy.zaporozhets@gmail.com>
|
| | |\ \ \ \
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
Signed-off-by: Dmitriy Zaporozhets <dmitriy.zaporozhets@gmail.com>
|
| | |\ \ \ \ \
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Signed-off-by: Dmitriy Zaporozhets <dmitriy.zaporozhets@gmail.com>
|
| | | |_|_|_|/
| | |/| | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
Signed-off-by: Dmitriy Zaporozhets <dmitriy.zaporozhets@gmail.com>
|
| | | | | | | |
|
| | |_|_|/ /
| |/| | | | |
|
| |\ \ \ \ \
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
Expiration date on memberships
Closes https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/17495
See merge request !5876
|
| | |\ \ \ \ \
| | | | |_|/ /
| | | |/| | | |
|
| | | | | | | |
|
| | |\ \ \ \ \ |
|
| | | | | | | | |
|
| | |_|/ / / /
| |/| | | | | |
|
| |\ \ \ \ \ \
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Truncated long user lists in award emoji tooltips
## What does this MR do?
Truncates award emoji tooltips so that they only show 10 users maximum.
Further users are indicated by appending "and X more."
## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
Is 10 too little, should it be raised?
My test cases rely on join() to build the expected output.
This feels a little iffy is it alright?
## Why was this MR needed?
Some issues have a large number of thumbs causing tooltips to be very large.
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
closes #18334, closes #19542
## Screenshots (if relevant)
##### Before

##### After

Truncation point modified for purposes of screenshot
## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
- [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added
- [x] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)
- [x] API support added
- [x] Tests
- [x] Added for this feature/bug
- [x] All builds are passing
- [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
- [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)
See merge request !4780
|
| | | | | | | | |
|
| | |_|/ / / /
| |/| | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
This older spec was failing: features/project/issues/issues.feature
Looks like before we were doing an exact match for queries, that's why
it was passing with this existing issue: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/59fa031e6f7d5a1b658c370f581c4caaf4493150/features/project/issues/issues.feature#L128
Failed build: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/builds/3178231
|
| | | | | | | |
|
| |/ / / / / |
|
| |\ \ \ \ \
| | |_|_|/ /
| |/| | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Set permissions to admin for importing a project via Import/Export
Fixes https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/20802
In order to import a project, it is now required to be an admin
Moved from https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/merge_requests/5766
See merge request !1983
|
| | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | |
|
| |\ \ \ \ \ |
|
| | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
`reload_status!` call
|
| |/ / / / / |
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
This change simplifies a Pipeline processing by introducing a special new status: created.
This status is used for all builds that are created for a pipeline.
We are then processing next stages and queueing some of the builds (created -> pending) or skipping them (created -> skipped).
This makes it possible to simplify and solve a few ordering problems with how previously builds were scheduled.
This also allows us to visualise a full pipeline (with created builds).
This also removes an after_touch used for updating a pipeline state parameters.
Right now in various places we explicitly call a reload_status! on pipeline to force it to be updated and saved.
|
| |\ \ \ \ \
| | |/ / / /
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
* master: (363 commits)
Added changelog item for issuable form dropdowns
Add 'run tests' docs from GDK
Bump gitlab_git to lazy load compare commits
Add examples to repository files API (!5465)
Ignore URLs starting with // (!5677)
Add failing test for #7032
Update timeago to shorter representation
Add missing DOWNTIME constant to the AddTimestampsToMembersAgain migration
Added guide about migrations and downtime
Update CHANGELOG for 8.10.4
Add a data migration to fix some missing timestamps in the members table (again)
Move abilities by subject class to a dedicated method
Remove unnecessary empty line after css var
Set consistency in list text height css
Add description to text/plain emails
Fix Rename `add_users_into_project` and `projects_ids`
fix spec
Underscore variable to camelCase
using shared path for project import uploads and refactored gitlab remove export worker
Structure the development documentation
...
|
| | | |/ /
| | |/| | |
|
| | |/ /
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
If you add another branch to gitlab-test that includes the word 'test',
browse_files.feature will fail with an ambiguous match.
|
| | |/
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
1. Remove `Project#developers_can_push_to_protected_branch?` since it
isn't used anymore.
2. Remove `Project#developers_can_merge_to_protected_branch?` since it
isn't used anymore.
|
| | |\
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Generate coverage report from whole test suite
Extends our CI plan to merge all coverage results and generate HTML report.
See merge request !5018
|
| | | | |
|
| | | | |
|
| | | | |
|