| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| | |
|
| |\
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Support configurable attachment size in Application Settings page
### What does this MR do?
This MR provides the ability to configure the maximum size of an attachment inside a note. A parameter has been added to the Application Settings page.
### Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
What should be done with the legacy note attachment validation? I added code to make the validation work with the configurable setting. I could see an issue where an admin lowers the limit from 10 megabytes to 5 megabytes, which could cause an existing model to be invalid.
### Why was this MR needed?
We often have attachments that exceed 10 MB, and it would be nice to be able to override the defaults.
### What are the relevant issue numbers / [Feature requests](http://feedback.gitlab.com/)?
See Issue #1258
### Screenshots
Before:
After:
See merge request !407
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Fix bug where error messages from Dropzone would not be displayed on the issues page
Closes #1258
|
| |/ |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |\ |
|
| | | |
|
| |\ \
| |/
|/|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
We've moved external trackers to service, remove from gitlab.yml.
Fixes #1937
See merge request !1743
|
| | | |
|
| |\ \
| |/
|/| |
|
| | | |
|
| |/ |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
successful Git over HTTP authentication.
Add logging when a ban goes into effect for debugging.
Issue #1171
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This reverts commit 516bcabbf42d60db2ac989dce4c7187b2a1e5de9.
Conflicts:
Gemfile
|
| |
|
|
| |
You get redirected after signuout to gitlab.com and see this message on login page which makes no sense.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
I find it really annoying every time I login into GitLab it shows me
that I successfully signed in. But this makes no sense to me. I already
see dashboard and dont see login screen. Its obvious I signed in
successfully. Instead it just show annyoing message every time taking
part of space on my screen.
|
| | |
|
| |\
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Subscription to issue/mr
Fixes #1911 and #1909
See merge request !1702
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| |\ \
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Restricted visibility levels - bug fix and new feature
This allows admin users to override restricted visibility settings when creating and updating projects and snippets, and moves the restricted visibility configuration from gitlab.yml to the web UI. See #1903.
## Move configuration location
I added a new section to the application settings page for restricted visibility levels. Each level has a checkbox, styled with Bootstrap to look like a toggle button. A checked box means that the level is restricted. I added a glowing text shadow and changed the background color for checked buttons because the default styles made it hard to distinguish between checked and unchecked. This image shows the new section with the "Public" box checked:
## Allow admins to override
To allow admin users to override the restricted visibility levels, I had to remove the `visibility_level` validation from the `Project` class. The model doesn't know about the `current_user`, which should determine whether the restrictions can be overridden. We could use the creator in the validation, but that wouldn't work correctly for projects where a non-admin user is the creator and an admin tries to change the project to a restricted visibility level.
The `Project::UpdateService` and `Project::CreateService` classes already had code to determine whether the current user is allowed to use a given visibility level; now all visibility level validation is done in those classes. Currently, when a non-admin tries to create or update a project using a restricted level, these classes silently set the visibility level to the global default (create) or the project's existing value (update). I changed this behavior to be more like an Active Model validation, where using a restricted level causes the entire request to be rejected.
Project and personal snippets didn't have service classes, and restricted visibility levels weren't being enforced in the model or the controllers. The UI disabled radio buttons for restricted levels, but that wouldn't be difficult to circumvent. I created the `CreateSnippetService` and `UpdateSnippetService` classes to do the same restricted visibility check that the project classes do. And since I was dealing with snippet visibility levels, I updated the API endpoints for project snippets to allow users to set and update the visibility level.
## TODO
* [x] Add more tests for restricted visibility functionality
cc @sytse @dzaporozhets
See merge request !1655
|
| | |\ \
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Conflicts:
db/schema.rb
|
| | | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Add checkboxes to the application settings page for restricted
visibility levels, and remove those settings from gitlab.yml.
|
| | | | | |
|
| | | | | |
|
| | | | | |
|
| | |/ /
|/| | |
|
| | |/
|/| |
|
| |\ \
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Allow smb:// links in Markdown text.
As requested by Sam McLeod at https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/1184
See merge request !1669
|
| | | | |
|
| |\ \ \ |
|
| | |/ / |
|
| |/ / |
|
| | | |
|
| |\ \
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Move profile groups page to dashboard
For #2069
See merge request !1654
|
| | | | |
|
| |\ \ \
| |/ /
|/| |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Add link to smtp documentation.
Closes #2070
See merge request !1627
|
| | | | |
|
| | |/
|/| |
|
| |\ \
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Increase timeout for Git-over-HTTP requests.
Fixes #2081 and https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/232.
Normal web requests are bound by the `Rack::Timeout` timeout of 60 seconds, while Grack Git-over-HTTP requests are only bound by Unicorn's timeout which is now set to 1 hour, which should be plenty.
The omnibus package should be updated to no longer use `unicorn['worker_timeout']` for the Unicorn timeout, but to set the `Slowpoke.timeout`.
See merge request !1619
|
| | |/ |
|
| |/ |
|
| |\
| |
| | |
Remove useless `assets.compress` option, Rails 4 uses only `assets.js_co...
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
`assets.js_compressor`
> The config.assets.compress option should be changed to config.assets.js_compressor like so for instance
|
