| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
| |
This reverts commit c0116926c743818b2593474946abb40b56d8fefa.
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |\
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Update mentionable shared examples to be (a bit) more understandable
These shared examples were super confusing, and honestly still kind of are, but they should be a bit better now.
I encountered a bunch of headaches in these examples while refactoring ReferenceExtractor, so that's how I ended up changing it.
See merge request !1780
|
| | | |
|
| |\ \
| | |
| | | |
Fix broken link in jira service
|
| | | | |
|
| |\ \ \
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Fix bug causing at-username inside code blocks to sometimes be picked up as a user mention.
Addresses private issue https://dev.gitlab.org/gitlab/gitlabhq/issues/2254.
See merge request !553
|
| | | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
a user mention.
|
| | | | | |
|
| |/ / / |
|
| |\ \ \
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Clean up code around commit mentions.
Builds upon !527.
See merge request !528
|
| | | | | |
|
| | | | | |
|
| | | | | |
|
| | | | | |
|
| | | | | |
|
| |\ \ \ \
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
Decrease memory use and increase performance of Google Code importer.
Addresses private issue https://dev.gitlab.org/gitlab/gitlabhq/issues/2241.
See merge request !536
|
| | | |_|/
| |/| | |
|
| |/ / / |
|
| |/ /
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Having a merge request with a comments on a line which is then changed
in a later commit prevented new comments from properly showing up in the
merge request show page.
* `Note#set_diff` do not use stored the diff when creating a new note
in merge requests (we can not be sure the diff did not changed since
the last comment on that line)
* Do not rely just on `outdated?` of the first note when displaying
comments of a MR in the discussion tab, but partition the
active/outdated notes and display them all
* In the inline changes tab just select the active notes, so an
outdated note does not prevent an active one from being rendered
* Just show active comments in the side-by-side changes tab
|
| |\ \
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Fix generating SSH key fingerprints with OpenSSH 6.8.
Replaces https://github.com/gitlabhq/gitlabhq/pull/9008.
Fixes gitlab-org/gitlab-ce#1289.
cc @jacobvosmaer
See merge request !519
|
| | | | |
|
| | | | |
|
| | | | |
|
| | | | |
|
| |\ \ \
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Don't use HTML ellipsis in EmailsOnPush subject truncated commit message.
Addresses private issue https://dev.gitlab.org/gitlab/gitlabhq/issues/2229.
Since the page is encoded as UTF-8, we don't need HTML entities anymore and can just use the character.
See merge request !521
|
| | | | | |
|
| |\ \ \ \
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
Allow users to be invited.
Addresses private issue https://dev.gitlab.org/gitlab/gitlabhq/issues/2058.
The "Add members" panes for both Group Members and Project Members have gained a line of text by the People field.
Entering an email address that is not already a member will give you the option to invite them.
Choosing the option will add them to the People field. This works the right way (TM) in combination with adding existing users as members.
The invited member will be shown in the members list as such. The access level can be changed, and the invite can be revoked by deleting the member.
The invited user will receive an email with an "Accept invitation" link.
If they're not already logged in, clicking this link will redirect them to the sign in/up page with a helpful notice.
Signing in or signing up will redirect them back to the invite detail page, where they can actually accept the invitation, which will update the member record in question to point to the user in question.
Accepting the invitation will redirect them to the group (or project) with an appropriate notice.
As currently, they will also receive this information by email.
At the same time, the person who initially invited the email address is sent a notification as well, so they know of the new member and to tell them what name the user signed up with.
The member row on the Members page will now have been updated with the new user account.
See merge request !500
|
| | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | |
|
