| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |\
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Enable Style/IdenticalConditionalBranches Rubocop cop
## What does this MR do?
This MR enables Rubocop cop that checks for identical lines at the end of each branch of a conditional statement.
Examples:
```ruby
@bad
if condition
do_x
do_z
else
do_y
do_z
end
@good
if condition
do_x
else
do_y
end
do_z
```
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
#17478
See merge request !5011
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| |\ \
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Fix comment for project argument in commit_range.rb
## What does this MR do?
It fixes the documentation for commit_range project argument
## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
## Why was this MR needed?
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
## Screenshots (if relevant)
## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
- [ ] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added
- [ ] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)
- [ ] API support added
- [ ] Tests
- [ ] Added for this feature/bug
- [ ] All builds are passing
- [ ] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [ ] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
- [ ] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)
See merge request !4805
|
| | | | |
|
| | |/
|/| |
|
| |\ \
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Added setting to set new users by default as external
## What does this MR do?
This implements the feature request #14508. It adds an option in the application settings to set new users by default as external.
## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
Everything. Like I mentioned in the discussion of the issue my knowledge of Ruby basically doesn't exists. I tested it on my machine and it seems to work, but as I am very unexperienced in Ruby I highly recommend to take a close look at the code.
## Why was this MR needed?
It was requested by @DouweM to work on the issue with the proposed changes by me.
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
This MR is for the issue #14508 that followed up after the implementation of #4009.
See merge request !4545
|
| | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
As requested by the issue #14508 this adds an option in the application
settings to set newly registered users by default as external. The
default setting is set to false to stay backward compatible.
|
| |\ \ \
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Use scope rather than class method
## What does this MR do?
Use scope rather than class method
## Why was this MR needed?
I assume this would be useful and more clear.
See merge request !5133
|
| | |/ / |
|
| |\ \ \
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Prefer ref rather than id because id is shadowing database id
## What does this MR do?
Just a local variable renaming.
## Why was this MR needed?
Prefer ref rather than id because id is shadowing database id.
See merge request !5134
|
| | | | | |
|
| | |/ /
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Some context:
http://doc.gitlab.com/ce/api/repository_files.html#get-file-from-repository
http://doc.gitlab.com/ce/api/repositories.html#list-repository-tree
Slack:
https://gitlab.slack.com/archives/questions/p1467890450002077
|
| |\ \ \
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Allow specifying protected branches using wildcards
Closes #18627
# Tasks
- [ ] #18627 !4665 Allow specifying protected branches using wildcards
- [x] Find existing usages of protected branches
- Protecting branches
- `ProtectedBranchesController` is used to mark a branch protected/unprotected
- `API::Branches` can be used to mark a branch protected/unprotected
- Enforcing branch protection
- `Gitlab::GitAccess` has helpers (`can_push_to_branch?`, `check`) that are used to deny pushes if a branch is protected
- Over SSH: `gitlab-shell` receives a push, and calls `/allowed` on the GitLab API, which calls `GitAccess.check`
- Over HTTP:
- `gitlab-workhorse` receives the request, and forwards it to rails
- Rails (in the `GitHttpController#git-recieve-pack`) runs basic checks (is the user logged in, not protected branch checks) and returns ok with `GL_ID` and `RepoPath`
- `gitlab-workhorse` looks at the response, and calls the relevant `gitlab-shell` action from `git-http/handlePostRPC`
- Rest of this flow is the same as the SSH flow above
- [x] Implementation
- [x] Backend
- [x] Change `project#protected_branch?` to look at wildcard protected branches
- [x] Change `project#developers_can_push_to_protected_branch?`
- [x] Change `project#open_branches`
- [x] Better error message when creating a disallowed branch from the Web UI
- [x] Frontend
- [x] Protected branches page should allow typing out a wildcard pattern
- [x] Add help text explaining the use of wildcards
- [x] Show matching branches for each protected branch
- [x] ~~On the index page~~
- [x] On a show page
- [x] Index?
- [x] Can't have the "last commit" column for wildcard protected branches
- [x] Fix / write tests
- [x] What happens if a hook is missing in dev?
- [x] Refactor
- [x] Test workflows
- Create a branch matching a wildcard pattern
- Push to a branch matching a wildcard pattern
- Force push to a branch matching a wildcard pattern
- Delete a branch matching a wildcard pattern
- [x] Test using Web UI
- [x] Test over SSH
- [x] Test over HTTP
- [x] Test as developer and master
- [x] Investigate performance
- [x] Test with a large number of protected branches / branches
- [x] Paginate list of protected branches
- [x] ~~Possibly rewrite `open_branches`~~
- [x] Add `iid`s to existing `ProtectedBranch`es
- [x] Add documentation
- [x] Add CHANGELOG entry
- [x] Add screenshots
- [x] Make sure [build](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/commit/2f753e3ed2ce681b4444944d521f4419e8ed37f7/builds) passes
- [x] Assign to endboss for review
- [x] Address @DouweM's comments
- [x] `protected_branch_params`
- [x] `exact_match` instead of `explicit_match`
- [x] When would self.name be blank?
- [x] Move `protected_branches.each` to a partial
- [x] Move `matching_branches.each` to a partial
- [x] If the branch is in @matching_branches, it's not been removed
- [x] move this regex to a method and memoize it
- [x] `commit_sha` directly for exact matches
- [x] Number of matches for wildcard matches, with a link
- [x] Wait for [build](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/commit/43f9ce0e88194b8f719bb1c1e656b7fc13278d56/builds) to pass
- [x] Respond to @DouweM's comments
- [x] Don't use iid
- [x] Controller should use `@project.protected_branches.new`
- [x] move the memoization to `def wildcard_regex`
- [x] render with `collection: @protected_branches`
- [x] Wait for [build](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/commit/f7beedf122fa0c7aa89e86181fe7499321fb10ca/builds) to pass
- [x] Wait for @DouweM's review
- [x] Wait for @jschatz1's review
- [x] Respond to @jschatz1's comments
- [x] Use the new dropdown style
- [x] description should be moved to the description section without the styling
- [x] Protect button should be disabled when no branch is selected
- [x] Update screenshots
- [x] Merge conflicts
- [x] Make sure [build](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/commit/20f3cfe8d5540eab64c2ba548043d600b28c61ba/builds) passes
- [ ] Revisit performance, possibly with staging/production data
- [ ] Get a dump of staging / run against staging live
- [ ] Get SSH access to staging
- [ ] Wait for review/merge
# Screenshots
## Creating wildcard protected branches
### Using the `GLDropdown` component
## Enforcing wildcard protected branches
### From the Web UI
### Over SSH
### Over HTTPS
## Listing matching branches
See merge request !4665
|
| | | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
protected branch.
1. The `open_branches` method is used to provide a list of branches
while creating a protected branch.
2. It makes sense to include branches which are matched by one or more
wildcard protected branches, since the user might want to make exact
protected branches from these as well.
3. This also provides a large performance improvement. On my machine, in
a project with 5000 branches and 2000 protected branches, the
`ProtectedBranches#index` page went from a 40 seconds load time to 4
seconds (10x speedup).
|
| | | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
1. Allow entering any branch name for a protected branch.
- Either pick from a list of options, or enter it manually
- You can enter wildcards.
2. Display branches matching a protected branch.
- Add a `ProtectedBranches#show` page that displays the branches
matching the given protected branch, or a message if there are no
matches.
- On the `index` page, display the last commit for an exact match,
or the number of matching branches for a wildcard match.
- Add an `iid` column to `protected_branches` - this is what we use for
the `show` page URL.
- On the off chance that this feature is unnecessary, this commit
encapsulates it neatly, so it can be removed without affecting
anything else.
3. Remove the "Last Commit" column from the list of protected branches.
- There's no way to pull these for wildcard protected branches, so it's
best left for the `show` page.
- Rename the `@branches` instance variable to `@protected_branches`
- Minor styling changes with the "Unprotect" button - floated right
like the "Revoke" button for personal access tokens
4. Paginate the list of protected branches.
5. Move the instructions to the left side of the page.
|
| | | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
1. The main implementation is in the `ProtectedBranch` model. The
wildcard is converted to a Regex and compared. This has been tested
thoroughly.
- While `Project#protected_branch?` is the main entry point,
`project#open_branches` and
`project#developers_can_push_to_protected_branch?`
have also been modified to work with wildcard protected branches.
- The regex is memoized (within the `ProtectedBranch` instance)
2. Improve the performance of `Project#protected_branch?`
- This method is called from `Project#open_branches` once _per branch_
in the project, to check if that branch is protected or not.
- Before, `#protected_branch?` was making a database call every
time it was invoked (in the above case, that amounts to once
per branch), which is expensive.
- This commit caches the list of protected branches in memory, which
reduces the number of database calls down to 1.
- A downside to this approach is that `#protected_branch?` _could_
return a stale value (due to the caching), but this is
an acceptable tradeoff.
3. Remove the (now) unused `Project#protected_branch_names` method.
- This was previously used to check for protected branch status.
|
| |\ \ \ \
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
New diff notes
Fixes #12732, #14731, #19375, #14783
Builds on https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/merge_requests/4110
To do:
- [x] Get it mostly working
- [x] Validate position validity
- [x] Fix: Don’t link to `#`
- [x] Fix: Base ref can be `nil`, potentially, when the MR has an oprhan source branch => Yep, doesn’t work. We need to store a `start_id`
- [x] Optimize: Fewer duplicate `git diff` compares
- [x] Optimize: Pass paths to `PositionTracer#diff` for faster diffs
- [x] Refactor: Use `head_id` in `MergeRequest`/`MergeRequestDiff` instead of `source_sha`
- [x] Refactor: Convert existing array-based diff refs to the DiffRefs model
- [x] Tweak: Use `note_type` in `Autosave` key
- [x] Tweak: Remove `line_code: note.line_code` from `link_to_reply_discussion`
- [x] Update: `SentNotifications` and reply-by-email receiver
- [x] Update: MR diff notification email
- [x] Update: API (MR, Commit note creation and entity)
- [x] Update: GitHub importer
- [x] Address any other TODO comments
- [x] Fix: Suppress "edited 4 minutes ago"
- [x] Write tests
- [x] `LineMapper`
- [x] `PositionTracer`
- [x] `Position`
- [x] `DiffPositionUpdateService`
- [x] `DiffNote`
- [x] `MergeRequests::RefreshService` / `MergeRequest#update_diff_notes_positions`
- [x] Make sure commits with diff notes don't get cleaned up, since this would prevent the diff notes from being rendered (https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/merge_requests/5062)
Future improvements:
- Display unresolved comments on files outside the diff, if the comment was added when that file _was_ part of the diff
- Allow commenting on sections between hunks, when expanding the diff using `...`
- (We'd need to generate line code based on Position if we have it, even if it falls outside bounds of diff)
- `diff_hunk` on diff note API entity
- Show diff hunk in notification email
- Resolved line notes would have a boolean, and be inactive through `notes.any? { !active? || resolved? }`
- Multi line notes would store a number of positions, and do the right thing (™) in grouping and then rendering if the first item is multiline? => true
- Image diff notes could store x,y,width,height instead of old_line,new_line for similar grouping. Does it need a reference to say if it's on old or new? These can't have line_codes, clearly. Rendering would be interesting.
- Show commit line comments in the MR diff
- Comment on specific selected words
- Comment on file header
- Unfold top of discussion diff note
- New diff notes API for commits and MRs
/cc @rspeicher
See merge request !4101
|
| | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | |
|
| | | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
responsibility to other classes
|
| | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | |
|
| | | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
consistent
|
| | | |/ /
| |/| | |
|
| |\ \ \ \
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
Exclude projects pending delete from notifications
Make `NotificationSetting.for_projects` exclude projects that are excluded by the default scope on `Project`. (At the moment, that's projects with `pending_delete: true`.)
See https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/support-forum/issues/819
See merge request !5138
|
| | |/ / /
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
If the Sidekiq job fails for some reason, a project can be 'stuck'
pending deletion. The project can't be viewed, so it shouldn't be
available through the notification settings association as this will
throw an exception when we try to show the link.
|
| |/ / / |
|
| |\ \ \
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
'master'
Fix diff comments not showing up in activity feed
## What does this MR do?
It fixes the detection of note events to check for `Note` and `LegacyDiffNote`.
## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
No? /cc @DouweM (since I believe you introduced `LegacyDiffNote`
## Why was this MR needed?
To fix #19092.
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Fixes #19092.
## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
- [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added
- Tests
- [x] Added for this feature/bug
- [ ] All builds are passing
- [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
- [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)
See merge request !5069
|
| | | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Signed-off-by: Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>
|
| | | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Signed-off-by: Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>
|
| |\ \ \ \
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
Allow `?`, or `&` for label names
Closes #18727
See merge request !4724
|
| | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | |
|
| |\ \ \ \ \
| |/ / / /
|/| | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
Fixing URL validation for import_url on projects
Fixes https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/17536
This MR fixes problems related to bypassing `import_url` validation on projects. This makes sure the URL is properly validated so we don't enter crap and fail while running workers that handle this URL.
It also adds a migration to fix current invalid `import_url`s
See merge request !4753
|
| | |\ \ \ \
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
fix/import-url-validator
# Conflicts:
# spec/models/project_spec.rb
|
| | | | | | | |
|
