| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| | |
|
| |\
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Add shortcuts for adding users to a project team with a specific role
Closes #20944
See merge request !7565
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
This also updates _some_ specs to use these new methods, just to serve
as an example for others going forward, but by no means is this
exhaustive.
Original implementations at !5992 and !6012.
Closes https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/20944
|
| |\ \
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Revert "Merge branch 'docs/jira-old' into 'master'"
See merge request !7531
|
| | | | |
|
| |\ \ \
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Add help section for MM commands
## What should this MR do
Check @pedroms' design for the Mattermost service screen: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/22540
Now this has to be implemented, I've created a clean canvas for you, @lbennett, to draw on.
## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
- [x] [Changelog entry](https://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/changelog.html) added
- Tests
- [x] Added for this feature/bug
- [x] All builds are passing
- [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if it does - rebase it please)
- [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)
See merge request !7558
|
| | | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Also added tests, and moved the slack test to a better location.
|
| |\ \ \ \
| |_|/ /
|/| | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
External jobs do not have show page nor traces
Fixes #24677
See merge request !7617
|
| | | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Feedback:
https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/merge_requests/7617#note_18762721
|
| | | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/merge_requests/7617#note_18745170
https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/merge_requests/7617#note_18745221
|
| |\ \ \ \
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
Add deploy chat command
This adds a new ChatOps command:
```
/trigger deploy <environment> to <environment>
```
See merge request !7619
|
| | | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
environment to second one
|
| | | |/ /
| |/| | |
|
| |\ \ \ \
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
Send registry address with build payload
## What does this MR do?
Adds `registry_url` as a part of a build payload, when sending a response to a GitLab Runner which requested a new build.
## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
Change in `lib/ci/api/entities.rb`.
## Why was this MR needed?
This is one of the steps needed to add support for private/protected registries hosted with GitLab CE/EE.
## Screenshots (if relevant)
## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
- [x] [Changelog entry](https://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/changelog.html) added
- [ ] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)
- [x] API support added
- Tests
- [x] Added for this feature/bug
- [ ] All builds are passing
- [ ] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html)
- [ ] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [ ] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if it does - rebase it please)
- [ ] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Related to gitlab-org/gitlab-ci-multi-runner#1828, gitlab-org/gitlab-ci-multi-runner!386, gitlab-org/gitlab-ci-multi-runner#1434
See merge request !7474
|
| | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | |
|
| |\ \ \ \ \
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Fix errors happening when source branch of merge request is removed and then restored
See merge request !7568
|
| | | |/ / /
| |/| | | |
|
| |\ \ \ \ \
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Smarter cache invalidation
Fixes https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/23550
See merge request !7360
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
This refactors repository caching so it's possible to selectively
refresh certain caches, instead of just expiring and refreshing
everything.
To allow this the various methods that were cached (e.g. "tag_count" and
"readme") use a similar pattern that makes expiring and refreshing
their data much easier.
In this new setup caches are refreshed as follows:
1. After a commit (but before running ProjectCacheWorker) we expire some
basic caches such as the commit count and repository size.
2. ProjectCacheWorker will recalculate the commit count, repository
size, then refresh a specific set of caches based on the list of
files changed in a push payload.
This requires a bunch of changes to the various methods that may be
cached. For one, data should not be cached if a branch used or the
entire repository does not exist. To prevent all these methods from
handling this manually this is taken care of in
Repository#cache_method_output. Some methods still manually check for
the existence of a repository but this result is also cached.
With selective flushing implemented ProjectCacheWorker no longer uses an
exclusive lease for all of its work. Instead this worker only uses a
lease to limit the number of times the repository size is updated as
this is a fairly expensive operation.
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Initializing Rugged objects is way too expensive just to check if a
repository exists. Even though we cache this data once in a while we
have to refresh this. On GitLab.com we have seen Repository#exists?
taking up to _1 minute_ to complete in the absolute worst case, though
usually it sits around a second or so.
Using File.exist? to instead check if $GIT_DIR/refs exists is a much
faster way of checking if a repository was initialized properly.
|
| | |/ / / /
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
This moves the logic of detecting special repository files (e.g. a
README or a Koding configuration file) to a single class:
Gitlab::FileDetector. Moving this logic into a single place allows this
to be re-used more easily.
This commit also changes Repository#gitlab_ci_yaml so that its cached
similar to other data (e.g. the Koding configuration file).
|
| |\ \ \ \ \
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Allow JIRA references for project snippets
closes #24303
See merge request !7541
|
| | | | | | | |
|
| |\ \ \ \ \ \
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
Added permissions per stage to cycle analytics endpoint
See merge request !7613
|
| | | | | | | | |
|
| | | |_|_|/ /
| |/| | | | |
|
| |\ \ \ \ \ \
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
'24616-mr-shows-the-build-for-this-merge-request-failed-although-builds-still-running' into 'master'
Resolve "MR shows "The build for this merge request failed" although builds still running"
Closes #24616
See merge request !7579
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
Also allow merge request to be merged with skipped pipeline and the
"only allow merge when pipeline is green" feature enabled
Signed-off-by: Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>
|
| |\ \ \ \ \ \ \
| |_|_|/ / / /
|/| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
Do not create TODO when build is allowed to fail
## What does this MR do?
Do not create a TODO when build that failed is allowed to fail.
## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
- [x] [Changelog entry](https://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/changelog.html) added
- [x] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)
- Tests
- [x] Added for this feature/bug
- [ ] All builds are passing
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Closes #22280
See merge request !7618
|
| | | |/ / / /
| |/| | | | |
|
| |\ \ \ \ \ \
| |_|_|/ / /
|/| | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Backport some changes done from Time Tracking feature in EE.
See merge request !7604
|
| | | | | | | |
|
| |\ \ \ \ \ \
| |_|_|/ / /
|/| | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Allow to block JIRA events for commits and merge requests
implements #5541
See merge request !7469
|
| | | | | | | |
|
| |\ \ \ \ \ \
| |_|_|/ / /
|/| | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Remove unnecessary self from user model
self keyword nod needed. Code is more clean and understandable. https://github.com/bbatsov/ruby-style-guide#no-self-unless-required
See merge request !7551
|
| | | |_|_|/
| |/| | | |
|
| |\ \ \ \ \
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Fix pipeline author for Slack and use pipeline id for pipeline link
[Context](https://gitlab.slack.com/archives/runner-builds/p1479238493000018)
Pipeline Slack message:
> gitlab-org/gitlab-ci-multi-runner: Pipeline 8bed2a3b of fix/handle-failed-state-while-patching-trace branch by failed in 1389 seconds
Quotes:
> @godfat Take a look at these notifications, they seems to be missing author and should probably use Pipeline ID instead of SHA
See merge request !7506
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
rather than using SHA for the pipeline link.
|
| |\ \ \ \ \ \
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
Precalculate authorized projects in database
## What does this MR do?
It caches user's authorized projects in database instead of using multiple unions, which should simplify and speed-up things since this operation (getting authorized projects) is used a lot.
## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
Did we miss a scenario where we need to refresh the list of projects?
## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
- [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added
- [ ] ~~[Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)~~
- [ ] ~~API support added~~
- Tests
- [x] Added for this feature/bug
- [x] All builds are passing
- [x] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html)
- [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if it does - rebase it please)
- [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
#23150
See merge request !6839
|
| | | |_|_|/ /
| |/| | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Closes #23150
|
| |\ \ \ \ \ \
| |_|_|_|/ /
|/| | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Slash command for mattermost
Closes #22540
## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
- [x] [Changelog entry](https://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/changelog.html) added
- [ ] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)
- Tests
- [x] Added for this feature/bug
- [x] All builds are passing
- [x] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html)
- [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if it does - rebase it please)
See merge request !7438
|
| | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
This prevents leakage of project names on an endpoint which is
unauthenticated and thus open to the world.
|
| | | | | | | |
|
| | |\ \ \ \ \
| | | |_|/ /
| | |/| | | |
|
| | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
[ci skip]
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Now, each subcommand has its own service, plus I've introduced
presenters to be able to delegate the generation of the views.
|
