| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
This prevents leakage of project names on an endpoint which is
unauthenticated and thus open to the world.
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |\ |
|
| | |\
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Decide on and document a convention for singletons
> The singleton pattern is a design pattern that restricts the instantiation of a class to one object. This is useful when exactly one object is needed to coordinate actions across the system.
The simplest implementation uses an object literal to contain the logic.
```javascript
gl.MyThing = {
prop1: 'hello',
method1: () => {}
};
```
A live example of this is [GfmAutoComplete](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/172aab108b875e8dc9a5f1d3c2d53018eff76ea1/app/assets/javascripts/gfm_auto_complete.js.es6)
Another approach makes use of ES6 `class` syntax.
```javascript
let singleton;
class MyThing {
constructor() {
if (!singleton) {
singleton = this;
singleton.init();
}
return singleton;
}
init() {
this.prop1 = 'hello';
}
method1() {}
}
gl.MyThing = MyThing;
```
A live example of this is [Sidebar](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/app/assets/javascripts/sidebar.js.es6)
Another functional approach to define Singleton using `Javascript Revealing Module Pattern` is like below
```javascript
/**
* 1. It instantiates only a single object
* 2. It is safe – it keeps the reference to the singleton inside a variable, which lives inside a lexical closure, so it is not accessible by the outside world
* 3. It allows privacy – you can define all private methods of your singleton inside the lexical closure of the first module pattern
* 4. No this keyword trap (no wrong context referring)
* 5. No use of new keyword
* 6. Easy to write test code
*/
//
const Singleton = (function () {
// Instance stores a reference to the Singleton
var instance;
function init() {
// Singleton
// Private methods and variables
function privateMethod(){
console.log( "I am private" );
}
var privateVariable = "Im also private";
var privateRandomNumber = Math.random();
return {
// Public methods and variables
publicMethod: function () {
console.log( "The public can see me!" );
},
publicProperty: "I am also public",
getRandomNumber: function() {
return privateRandomNumber;
}
};
};
return {
// Get the Singleton instance if one exists
// or create one if it doesn't
getInstance: function () {
if ( !instance ) {
instance = init();
}
return instance;
}
};
})();
const singletonObj = Singleton.getInstance()
```
## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
## What does this MR do?
Creates a space for discussion and contribution for interested devs.
## Why was this MR needed?
## Screenshots (if relevant)
## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
- [x] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)
- [x] All builds are passing
(http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html)
- [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
See merge request !6620
|
| | | | |
|
| | | | |
|
| | |\ \
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Fixing the issue of visiting a project fork url giving 500 error when not signed…
Closes https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/24302
See merge request !7392
|
| | | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
for create action to import path
|
| | | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
create actions
|
| | | | | |
|
| | | | | |
|
| | | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
and user visits the new fork page
|
| | | | | |
|
| | | | | |
|
| | | | | |
|
| | | | | |
|
| | | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
signed in instead of being redirected to the sign in page. The main reason is ApplicationController skips authentication if the project exists. To fix the issue, forced the authentication in ForksController when current_user is nil.
|
| | |\ \ \
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
Support subscribing to group labels
https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/23586
See merge request !7215
|
| | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | |
|
| | |\ \ \ \
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Allows to authorize chat user against GitLab.
This is needed for: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/merge_requests/7438
See merge request !7450
|
| | | | | | | |
|
