| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
gitlab_git 10.6.4 relies on Rugged marking blobs as binary or not,
instead of relying on Linguist. Linguist in turn would mark text blobs
as binary whenever they would contain byte sequences that could not be
encoded using UTF-8.
However, marking such blobs as binary is not correct. If one pushes a
Markdown document with invalid character sequences it's still a text
based Markdown document and not some random binary blob.
This commit overwrites Blob#data so it automatically converts text-based
content to UTF-8 (the encoding we use everywhere else) while taking care
of replacing any invalid sequences with the UTF-8 replacement character.
The data of binary blobs is left as-is.
|
| |
|
|\
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Gitlab::Checks is now instrumented
See merge request !6318
|
| |
| |
| | |
So we have a detailed view of what checks perform bad
|
|\ \
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
'master'
Avoid protected branches checks when verifying access without branch name
See merge request !6317
|
| |/
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
GitlabShell verify access sending ‘_any’ as the changes made on the git command, in those cases Gitlab::Checks::ChangeAccess won’t receive a branch_name so we don’t need to check for access to the
protected branches on that repository. So we avoid some git operations in case the are not cached (empty_repo?) and some database lookups to get protected branches.
These request is happening in every push.
|
|\ \
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
'master'
Removed horizontal overflow from collapsed issuable sidebar
## What does this MR do?
Uses flexbox to remove any horizontal overflow from the collapsed issuable sidebar
## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
## Why was this MR needed?
There was a horizontal scrollbar at the bottom of all collapsed issuable sidebars as seen in the screenshot in #21895.
## Screenshots (if relevant)

## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
- [ ] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added
- [ ] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)
- [ ] API support added
- Tests
- [ ] Added for this feature/bug
- [ ] All builds are passing
- [ ] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html)
- [ ] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [ ] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
- [ ] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Closes #21895.
See merge request !6295
|
| | | |
|
|\ \ \
| |_|/
|/| |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Fixed issue merge-request-info missing on mobile
## What does this MR do?
Removed media query declaration relating to `.merge-request-info` and `.issue-info`.
## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
## Why was this MR needed?
Mobile UX
## Screenshots (if relevant)

## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
- [ ] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added
- [ ] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)
- [ ] API support added
- Tests
- [ ] Added for this feature/bug
- [ ] All builds are passing
- [ ] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html)
- [ ] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [ ] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
- [ ] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Closes #21877
See merge request !6250
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
|\ \ \
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Fix an error where we were unable to create a CommitStatus for running state
Due to severe refactoring of Pipeline we introduced regression in how CommitStatus is handled. We received an report that it's impossible to create a CommitStatus with state `running` when there were not previous status.
The support for Commit Statuses should be simplified. Right now I'm doing minimal change to move forward and fix a bug, but I'll create a new MR that will move all logic that is now part of `lib/api/commit_statuses.rb` to separate service to simplify the implementation.
This error happens due to the fact that we introduced additional status of builds: `created`.
Fixes https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/21345
See merge request !6107
|
| | | | |
|
|\ \ \ \
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
'19694-remove-duplication-between-project-builds-and-admin-builds-view' into 'master'
Remove duplication between project builds and admin builds view
Closes #19694
See merge request !5680
|
| | | | | |
|
| | | | | |
|
| | | | | |
|
| | | | | |
|
| | | | | |
|
| | | | | |
|
| | | | | |
|
| | | | | |
|
| | | | | |
|
| | | | | |
|
| | | | | |
|
| | | | | |
|
| | | | | |
|
| | | | | |
|
| | | | | |
|
|\ \ \ \ \
| |/ / / /
|/| | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
Include region in S3 configuration
- [x] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)
See https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/merge_requests/5336
See merge request !5896
|
| | | | | |
|
| | | | | |
|
|\ \ \ \ \
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Ensure specs on sorting of issues in API are deterministic on MySQL
## What does this MR do?
Ensure a deterministic order of issues on the existing API issues specs
## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
## Why was this MR needed?
To avoid random failures as described on #22057
## Screenshots (if relevant)
## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
- [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added
- ~~[ ] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)~~
- ~~[ ] API support added~~
- Tests
- ~~[ ] Added for this feature/bug~~
- [ ] All builds are passing
- [x] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html)
- [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
- [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Closes #22057
See merge request !6306
|
| | |/ / /
| |/| | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
MySQL could not have support for millisecond precision, depends on the MySQL version
so we just create issues in different seconds in a deterministic way
|
|\ \ \ \ \
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Fix two problematic bits of code that will be deprecated or broken in Rails 5.
Found in the Rails 5 MR: !5555
These are safe to use in Rails 4.2.7 as well as Rails 5.0.0, so I figured I'd backport them for the sake of making that merge request smaller.
The explanation for the mime_types.rb code is here: https://github.com/rails-api/active_model_serializers/issues/1027#issuecomment-126543577
See merge request !6214
|
| | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | |
|
|\ \ \ \ \ \
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
Update templates.
See merge request !6163
|
| | | | | | | |
|
|\ \ \ \ \ \ \
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Only add original author tag line when importing from GitHub if there isn't a linked GitLab account
## What does this MR do?
If there we've found a linked GitLab user for a creator of an issue or comment don't add the 'Created By:' line.
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Closes #21569
See merge request !6081
|
| | | | | | | | |
|
|\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Document how to track custom events
## What does this MR do?
This documents how one can track custom events.
## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
Spelling, etc.
## Why was this MR needed?
This wasn't documented.
## Screenshots (if relevant)
## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
- [x] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)
- [ ] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
- [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/22070
See merge request !6310
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Fixes gitlab-org/gitlab-ce#22070
[ci skip]
|
|\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
into 'master'
While using Gitlab UI to edit a file it changes the file permissions this MR aims to fix it
Closes #21092
See merge request !5979
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Signed-off-by: Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
refactors update file
|
|\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Add information about user and manual build start to runner as variables
Closes #21825
See merge request !6201
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
| |_|_|/ / / / / / / /
|/| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Make the cases clear instead of having guards
See merge request !6304
|