| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |\
| |
| |
| | |
2451-fix-mentions-in-issue-updates
|
| | |\
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Use new PhantomJS version
## What does this MR do?
Makes CI builds to use PhantomJS 2.1.1.
## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
## Why was this MR needed?
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
## Screenshots (if relevant)
## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
- [ ] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added
- [ ] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)
- [ ] API support added
- Tests
- [ ] Added for this feature/bug
- [ ] All builds are passing
- [ ] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [ ] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
- [ ] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)
See merge request !5740
|
| | | | |
|
| | | | |
|
| | | | |
|
| | | | |
|
| | | | |
|
| | | | |
|
| | | | |
|
| | | | |
|
| | | | |
|
| | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
- We weren't explicilty waiting for the page to load while navigating
to the "Manage two-factor authentication" page. This was probably
incidentally working for PhantomJS 1.x versions.
|
| | | | |
|
| | | | |
|
| | | | |
|
| | |\ \
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Try to get back todo's cache or at least avoid hitting the database
See merge request !5789
|
| | | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
We’re being kept up to date the counter data but we’re not using it.
The only thing which is not real if is the number of projects that the
user read changes the number of todos can be stale for some time.
The counters will be sync just after the user receives a new todo or mark any as done
|
| | | | | |
|
| | |\ \ \
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
Speed up todos queries by limiting the projects set we join with
See merge request !5791
|
| | | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
Follow-up 1003454c
|
| | | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
Follow-up on 1003454c
|
| | | | | | |
|
| | |/ / /
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Closes #20828
|
| | |\ \ \
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
Change the order of the access rules to check simpler first, and add specs
See merge request !5799
|
| | | | | | |
|
| | |\ \ \ \
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Ability to restrict branches for pivotal tracker integration
## What does this MR do?
It allows to specify branches which you want to track for pivotal tracker integration.
## Why was this MR needed?
Typical use case: send commits to PivotalTracker and finish the story only when the feature branch is merged into master.
See merge request !5752
|
| | | | |_|/
| | |/| | |
|
| | |\ \ \ \
| | |/ / /
| |/| | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
Fix a memory leak caused by Banzai::Filter::SanitizationFilter
See merge request !5808
|
| | |/ / /
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
In Banzai::Filter::SanitizationFilter#customize_whitelist, we append
three lambdas that has reference to the SanitizationFilter instance,
which in turn (potentially) has a reference to the following chain:
context hash -> Project instance -> Repository instance -> lookup hash
-> various Rugged instances -> various mmap-ed git pack files.
All of the above is not garbage collected because the array we append
the lambdas to is the constant
HTML::Pipeline::SanitizationFilter::WHITELIST.
|
| | |\ \ \
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
Don't show new MR URL after push when it doesn't make sense
See merge request !5786
|
| | | |/ / |
|
| | |\ \ \
| | |/ /
| |/| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Add archived badge to project listing
## What does this MR do?
Add an `archived` badge to the user project list, if the project is archived.
## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
No.
## Why was this MR needed?
Customer noted in https://gitlab.zendesk.com/agent/tickets/33787 that there is no distinction for archived projects in the project dashboard/explore projects page. There is an archived badge on the admin projects page, though.
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
## Screenshots (if relevant)
Existing admin projects page:
New project list with archived badge:
See merge request !5798
|
| | |/ / |
|
| | | | |
|
| |\ \ \
| |/ /
| | |
| | | |
2451-fix-mentions-in-issue-updates
|
| | |\ \
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Fix bug where destroying a namespace would not always destroy projects
There is a race condition in DestroyGroupService now that projects are deleted asynchronously:
1. User attempts to delete group
2. DestroyGroupService iterates through all projects and schedules a Sidekiq job to delete each Project
3. DestroyGroupService destroys the Group, leaving all its projects without a namespace
4. Projects::DestroyService runs later but the can?(current_user,
:remove_project) is `false` because the user no longer has permission to
destroy projects with no namespace.
5. This leaves the project in pending_delete state with no namespace/group.
Projects without a namespace or group also adds another problem: it's not possible to destroy the container registry tags, since `container_registry_path_with_namespace` is the wrong value.
The fix is to destroy the group asynchronously and run `execute` directly on Projects::DestroyService.
Closes #17893
See merge request !4341
|
| | | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
There is a race condition in DestroyGroupService now that projects are deleted asynchronously:
1. User attempts to delete group
2. DestroyGroupService iterates through all projects and schedules a Sidekiq job to delete each Project
3. DestroyGroupService destroys the Group, leaving all its projects without a namespace
4. Projects::DestroyService runs later but the can?(current_user,
:remove_project) is `false` because the user no longer has permission to
destroy projects with no namespace.
5. This leaves the project in pending_delete state with no namespace/group.
Projects without a namespace or group also adds another problem: it's not possible to destroy the container
registry tags, since container_registry_path_with_namespace is the wrong value.
The fix is to destroy the group asynchronously and to run execute directly on Projects::DestroyService.
Closes #17893
|
| | |\ \ \
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
Update ruby 2.3.1
We where using 2.3.0, now 2.3.1
cc @connorshea
See merge request !5790
|
| | | | | | |
|
| | |\ \ \ \
| | |_|_|/
| |/| | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
Resolve "Format branch, tag, and commit in environment list"
## What does this MR do?
Updates Environments page rows to match the new pipeline updates
## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
I removed `private` from `avatars_helper.rb` so I could use `user_avatar`.
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Closes #20059
## Screenshots (if relevant)
See merge request !5687
|
| | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | |
|
| | |\ \ \ \
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Instrument Project.visible_to_user
## What does this MR do?
This MR instruments `Project.visible_to_user`
## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
No.
## Why was this MR needed?
The method in question was not instrumented due to being a Rails scope.
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
#12425
## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
- [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added
- Tests
- [ ] All builds are passing
- [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [ ] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
- [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)
See merge request !5793
|
| | | | |/ /
| | |/| |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
Because this method is a Rails scope we have to instrument it manually
as regular the instrumentation methods only instrument methods defined
directly on a Class or Module.
|
| | |\ \ \ \
| | |/ / /
| |/| | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
Improve pipeline processing
## What does this MR do?
This works on top of https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/merge_requests/5295 trying to solve some edge cases introduced by that Merge Request. The fix switches to a state machine which is already a part of `Ci::Pipeline` and uses events with conditional transitions to switch between pipeline states.
This is approach is much more bullet proof and much easier to understand than a previous one where we were calling a `reload_status!` which manually updated `status`. Previous approach become confusing and prone to number of errors.
## Why was this MR needed?
This improves changes introduced by https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/merge_requests/5295
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
None, yet.
## Screenshots (if relevant)
Not needed.
## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
- [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added (not needed since changelog for https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/merge_requests/5295 is already introduced)
- [ ] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)
- [x] API support added (not needed)
- Tests
- [x] Added for this feature/bug (most of tests do cover the triggering of Pipeline)
- [ ] All builds are passing
- [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
- [ ] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)
See merge request !5782
|
