summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/PROCESS.md
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorGrzegorz Bizon <grzesiek.bizon@gmail.com>2016-09-03 09:35:21 +0200
committerGrzegorz Bizon <grzesiek.bizon@gmail.com>2016-09-03 09:35:21 +0200
commit2436631dea9264045d8694705a95d90c30b4057d (patch)
tree53c55f8c7ec7d4695d863585fe4dc8aba4527c84 /PROCESS.md
parentb3cd41b4014fa96780218f0f086de239731ec91a (diff)
parent2aaab34b67eb2a6593780eda33d501a715ef0c5f (diff)
downloadgitlab-ce-refactor/ci-config-add-logical-validation.tar.gz
Merge branch 'master' into refactor/ci-config-add-logical-validationrefactor/ci-config-add-logical-validation
* master: (414 commits) Remove suggested colors hover underline Fix markdown anchor icon interaction Fix expiration date picker after update Refactored code to rely less on IDs that could change Move CHANGELOG entry for !5858 from 8.11 to 8.12 Hides merge request section in edit project when disabled Fix a typo Change minimum Unicorns required to two Update memory requirements Added `.term-bold` declaration. Change the inline code to codeblocks for the new features doc guideline Fix GitLab import button Rename behaviour to behavior in bug issue template for consistency Convert datetime coffeescript spec to ES6 Align add button on repository view Update CHANGELOG with 8.11.4 entries. removed null return - renamed 'placeTop' to 'placeProfileAvatarsToTop' Refactor Ci::Build#raw_trace Move CHANGELOG entry to a proper version Change widths of content in MR pipeline tab ... Conflicts: lib/gitlab/ci/config/node/jobs.rb
Diffstat (limited to 'PROCESS.md')
-rw-r--r--PROCESS.md2
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/PROCESS.md b/PROCESS.md
index 8e1a3f7360f..8af660fbdd1 100644
--- a/PROCESS.md
+++ b/PROCESS.md
@@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ etc.).
The most important thing is making sure valid issues receive feedback from the
development team. Therefore the priority is mentioning developers that can help
-on those issue. Please select someone with relevant experience from
+on those issues. Please select someone with relevant experience from
[GitLab core team][core-team]. If there is nobody mentioned with that expertise
look in the commit history for the affected files to find someone. Avoid
mentioning the lead developer, this is the person that is least likely to give a