summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/t/t5613-info-alternate.sh
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* tests: mark tests as passing with SANITIZE=leakÆvar Arnfjörð Bjarmason2023-02-061-0/+2
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | When the "ab/various-leak-fixes" topic was merged in [1] only t6021 would fail if the tests were run in the "GIT_TEST_PASSING_SANITIZE_LEAK=check" mode, i.e. to check whether we marked all leak-free tests with "TEST_PASSES_SANITIZE_LEAK=true". Since then we've had various tests starting to pass under SANITIZE=leak. Let's mark those as passing, this is when they started to pass, narrowed down with "git bisect": - t5317-pack-objects-filter-objects.sh: In faebba436e6 (list-objects-filter: plug pattern_list leak, 2022-12-01). - t3210-pack-refs.sh, t5613-info-alternate.sh, t7403-submodule-sync.sh: In 189e97bc4ba (diff: remove parseopts member from struct diff_options, 2022-12-01). - t1408-packed-refs.sh: In ab91f6b7c42 (Merge branch 'rs/diff-parseopts', 2022-12-19). - t0023-crlf-am.sh, t4152-am-subjects.sh, t4254-am-corrupt.sh, t4256-am-format-flowed.sh, t4257-am-interactive.sh, t5403-post-checkout-hook.sh: In a658e881c13 (am: don't pass strvec to apply_parse_options(), 2022-12-13) - t1301-shared-repo.sh, t1302-repo-version.sh: In b07a819c05f (reflog: clear leftovers in reflog_expiry_cleanup(), 2022-12-13). - t1304-default-acl.sh, t1410-reflog.sh, t5330-no-lazy-fetch-with-commit-graph.sh, t5502-quickfetch.sh, t5604-clone-reference.sh, t6014-rev-list-all.sh, t7701-repack-unpack-unreachable.sh: In b0c61be3209 (Merge branch 'rs/reflog-expiry-cleanup', 2022-12-26) - t3800-mktag.sh, t5302-pack-index.sh, t5306-pack-nobase.sh, t5573-pull-verify-signatures.sh, t7612-merge-verify-signatures.sh: In 69bbbe484ba (hash-object: use fsck for object checks, 2023-01-18). - t1451-fsck-buffer.sh: In 8e4309038f0 (fsck: do not assume NUL-termination of buffers, 2023-01-19). - t6501-freshen-objects.sh: In abf2bb895b4 (Merge branch 'jk/hash-object-fsck', 2023-01-30) 1. 9ea1378d046 (Merge branch 'ab/various-leak-fixes', 2022-12-14) Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* alternates: use fspathcmp to detect duplicatesJeff King2016-10-101-0/+17
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | On a case-insensitive filesystem, we should realize that "a/objects" and "A/objects" are the same path. We already use fspathcmp() to check against the main object directory, but until recently we couldn't use it for comparing against other alternates (because their paths were not NUL-terminated strings). But now we can, so let's do so. Note that we also need to adjust count-objects to load the config, so that it can see the setting of core.ignorecase (this is required by the test, but is also a general bugfix for users of count-objects). Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* sha1_file: always allow relative paths to alternatesJeff King2016-10-101-2/+22
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | We recursively expand alternates repositories, so that if A borrows from B which borrows from C, A can see all objects. For the root object database, we allow relative paths, so A can point to B as "../B/objects". However, we currently do not allow relative paths when recursing, so B must use an absolute path to reach C. That is an ancient protection from c2f493a (Transitively read alternatives, 2006-05-07) that tries to avoid adding the same alternate through two different paths. Since 5bdf0a8 (sha1_file: normalize alt_odb path before comparing and storing, 2011-09-07), we use a normalized absolute path for each alt_odb entry. This means that in most cases the protection is no longer necessary; we will detect the duplicate no matter how we got there (but see below). And it's a good idea to get rid of it, as it creates an unnecessary complication when setting up recursive alternates (B has to know that A is going to borrow from it and make sure to use an absolute path). Note that our normalization doesn't actually look at the filesystem, so it can still be fooled by crossing symbolic links. But that's also true of absolute paths, so it's not a good reason to disallow only relative paths (it's potentially a reason to switch to real_path(), but that's a separate and non-trivial change). We adjust the test script here to demonstrate that this now works, and add new tests to show that the normalization does indeed suppress duplicates. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* count-objects: report alternates via verbose modeJeff King2016-10-101-0/+10
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | There's no way to get the list of alternates that git computes internally; our tests only infer it based on which objects are available. In addition to testing, knowing this list may be helpful for somebody debugging their alternates setup. Let's add it to the "count-objects -v" output. We could give it a separate flag, but there's not really any need. "count-objects -v" is already a debugging catch-all for the object database, its output is easily extensible to new data items, and printing the alternates is not expensive (we already had to find them to count the objects). Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* t5613: clarify "too deep" recursion testsJeff King2016-10-101-8/+19
| | | | | | | | | | | | These tests are just trying to show that we allow recursion up to a certain depth, but not past it. But the counting is a bit non-intuitive, and rather than test at the edge of the breakage, we test "OK" cases in the middle of the chain. Let's explain what's going on, and explicitly test the switch between "OK" and "too deep". Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* t5613: do not chdir in main processJeff King2016-10-031-59/+33
| | | | | | | | | | Our usual style when working with subdirectories is to chdir inside a subshell or to use "git -C", which means we do not have to constantly return to the main test directory. Let's convert this old test, which does not follow that style. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* t5613: whitespace/style cleanupsJeff King2016-10-031-52/+62
| | | | | | | | | Our normal test style these days puts the opening quote of the body on the description line, and indents the body with a single tab. This ancient test did not follow this. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* t5613: use test_must_failJeff King2016-10-031-6/+6
| | | | | | | | Besides being our normal style, this correctly checks for an error exit() versus signal death. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* t5613: drop test_valid_repo functionJeff King2016-10-031-12/+7
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This function makes sure that "git fsck" does not report any errors. But "--full" has been the default since f29cd39 (fsck: default to "git fsck --full", 2009-10-20), and we can use the exit code (instead of counting the lines) since e2b4f63 (fsck: exit with non-zero status upon errors, 2007-03-05). So we can just use "git fsck", which is shorter and more flexible (e.g., we can use "git -C"). Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* t5613: drop reachable_via functionJeff King2016-10-031-10/+0
| | | | | | | | | | | | This function was never used since its inception in dd05ea1 (test case for transitive info/alternates, 2006-05-07). Which is just as well, since it mutates the repo state in a way that would invalidate further tests, without cleaning up after itself. Let's get rid of it so that nobody is tempted to use it. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* Merge branch 'sb/clone-t57-t56'Junio C Hamano2016-04-061-1/+1
| | | | | | | Rename bunch of tests on "git clone" for better organization. * sb/clone-t57-t56: clone tests: rename t57* => t56*
* clone tests: rename t57* => t56*sb/clone-t57-t56Stefan Beller2016-03-161-0/+112
When trying to find a good spot for testing clone with submodules, I got confused where to add a new test file. There are both tests in t560* as well as t57* both testing the clone command. t/README claims the second digit is to indicate the command, which is inconsistent to the current naming structure. Rename all t57* tests to be in t56* to follow the pattern of the digits as laid out in t/README. It would have been less work to rename t56* => t57* because there are less files, but the tests in t56* look more basic and I assumed the higher the last digits the more complicated niche details are tested, so with the patch now it looks more in order to me. Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>