summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/t/t4038-diff-combined.sh
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* Merge branch 'mk/combine-diff-context-horizon-fix'Junio C Hamano2013-06-021-0/+48
|\ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | "git diff -c -p" was not showing a deleted line from a hunk when another hunk immediately begins where the earlier one ends. * mk/combine-diff-context-horizon-fix: combine-diff.c: Fix output when changes are exactly 3 lines apart
| * combine-diff.c: Fix output when changes are exactly 3 lines apartMatthijs Kooijman2013-05-151-0/+48
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | When a deletion is followed by exactly 3 (or whatever the number of context lines) unchanged lines, followed by another change, the combined diff output would hide the first deletion, resulting in a malformed diff. This happened because the 3 lines before each change are painted interesting, but also marked as no_pre_delete to prevent showing deletes that were previously marked as uninteresting. This behaviour was introduced in c86fbe53 (diff -c/--cc: do not include uninteresting deletion before leading context). However, as a side effect, this could also mark deletes that were already interesting as no_pre_delete. This would happen only if the delete was exactly 3 lines away from the next change, since lines farther away would not be touched by the "paint three lines before the change" code and lines closer would be painted by the "merge two adjacent hunks" code instead, which does not set the no_pre_delete flag. This commit fixes this problem by only setting the no_pre_delete flag for changes that were previously uninteresting. Signed-off-by: Matthijs Kooijman <matthijs@stdin.nl> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* | combine-diff: coalesce lost lines optimallyAntoine Pelisse2013-03-251-0/+129
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This replaces the greedy implementation to coalesce lost lines by using dynamic programming to find the Longest Common Subsequence. The O(n²) time complexity is obviously bigger than previous implementation but it can produce shorter diff results (and most likely easier to read). List of lost lines is now doubly-linked because we reverse-read it when reading the direction matrix. Signed-off-by: Antoine Pelisse <apelisse@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* | Allow combined diff to ignore white-spacesAntoine Pelisse2013-03-141-0/+111
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The combined diff --cc output does not honor options to ignore whitespace changes (-b, -w, and --ignore-space-at-eol). Correct this by passing diff flags to diff engine, so that combined diff behaves as normal diff does with spaces, and by coalescing lines that are removed from both (or more) parents, honoring the same rule to ignore whitespace changes. With this change, a conflict-less merge done using a ignore-* strategy option will not show any conflict if shown in combined-diff using the same option. Signed-off-by: Antoine Pelisse <apelisse@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* | t4038: add tests for "diff --cc --raw <trees>"John Keeping2013-02-051-0/+24
|/ | | | | Signed-off-by: John Keeping <john@keeping.me.uk> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* combined diff: correctly handle truncated fileThomas Rast2010-04-171-0/+8
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Consider an evil merge of two commits A and B, both of which have a file 'foo', but the merge result does not have that file. The combined-diff code learned in 4462731 (combine-diff: do not punt on removed or added files., 2006-02-06) to concisely show only the removal, since that is the evil part and the previous contents are presumably uninteresting. However, to diagnose an empty merge result, it overloaded the variable that holds the file's length. This means that the check also triggers for truncated files. Consequently, such files were not shown in the diff at all despite the merge being clearly evil. Fix this by adding a new variable that distinguishes whether the file was deleted (which is the case 4462731 handled) or truncated. In the truncated case, we show the full combined diff again, which is rather spammy but at least does not hide the evilness. Reported-by: David Martínez Martí <desarrollo@gestiweb.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* tests: update tests that used to failJunio C Hamano2010-01-281-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | "diff --cc" output t4038 tests was fixed by b810cbb (diff --cc: a lost line at the beginning of the file is shown incorrectly, 2009-07-22), which was actually the commit that introduced this test.. An error in "git merge -s resolve" t6035 tests was fixed by 730f728 (unpack-trees.c: look ahead in the index, 2009-09-20). Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* diff --cc: a lost line at the beginning of the file is shown incorrectlyJunio C Hamano2009-07-221-0/+84
When combine-diff inspected the diff from one parent to the merge result, it misinterpreted a header in the form @@ -l,k +0,0 @@. This hunk header means that K lines were removed from the beginning of the file, so the lost lines must be queued to the sline that represents the first line of the merge result, but we incremented our pointer incorrectly and ended up queuing it to the second line, which in turn made the lossage appear _after_ the first line. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>