summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/reflog-walk.h
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* make oneline reflog dates more consistent with multiline formatJeff King2009-03-201-1/+4
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The multiline reflog format (e.g., as shown by "git log -g") will show HEAD@{<date>} rather than HEAD@{<count>} in two situations: 1. If the user gave branch@{<date>} syntax to specify the reflog 2. If the user gave a --date=<format> specifier It uses the "normal" date format in case 1, and the user-specified format in case 2. The oneline reflog format (e.g., "git reflog show" or "git log -g --oneline") will show the date in the same two circumstances. However, it _always_ shows the date as a relative date, and it always ignores the timezone. In case 2, it seems ridiculous to trigger the date but use a format totally different from what the user requested. For case 1, it is arguable that the user might want to see the relative date by default; however, the multiline version shows the normal format. This patch does three things: - refactors the "relative_date" parameter to show_reflog_message to be an actual date_mode enum, since this is how it is used (it is passed to show_date) - uses the passed date_mode parameter in the oneline format (making it consistent with the multiline format) - does not ignore the timezone parameter in oneline mode Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* git log -g: Complain, but do not fail, when no reflogs are thereJohannes Schindelin2007-07-241-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | When asking "git log -g --all", clearly you want to see only those refs that do have reflogs, but you do not want it to fail, either. So instead of die()ing, complain about it, but move on to the other refs. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* log --reflog: honour --relative-dateJohannes Schindelin2007-02-081-1/+1
| | | | | | | | If you say "git log -g --relative-date", it is very likely that you want to see the reflog names in terms of a relative date. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
* Fix --walk-reflog with --pretty=onelineJunio C Hamano2007-01-201-1/+1
| | | | | | | Now, "git log --abbrev-commit --pretty=o --walk-reflogs HEAD" is reasonably pleasant to use. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
* Teach the revision walker to walk by reflogs with --walk-reflogsJohannes Schindelin2007-01-201-0/+11
When called with "--walk-reflogs", as long as there are reflogs available, the walker will take this information into account, rather than the parent information in the commit object. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>