summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/t/t3400-rebase.sh
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJohn Keeping <john@keeping.me.uk>2014-07-16 20:23:49 +0100
committerJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>2014-07-16 13:07:40 -0700
commit1e0dacdbdb751caa5936b6d1510f5e8db4d1ed5f (patch)
treeaaceab8c326f0e2b418d16a8e8c46230391db013 /t/t3400-rebase.sh
parentb6266dc88b1fcc91d084cc9c65e0b0805cf59d55 (diff)
downloadgit-1e0dacdbdb751caa5936b6d1510f5e8db4d1ed5f.tar.gz
rebase: omit patch-identical commits with --fork-pointjk/rebase-am-fork-point
When the `--fork-point` argument was added to `git rebase`, we changed the value of $upstream to be the fork point instead of the point from which we want to rebase. When $orig_head..$upstream is empty this does not change the behaviour, but when there are new changes in the upstream we are no longer checking if any of them are patch-identical with changes in $upstream..$orig_head. Fix this by introducing a new variable to hold the fork point and using this to restrict the range as an extra (negative) revision argument so that the set of desired revisions becomes (in fork-point mode): git rev-list --cherry-pick --right-only \ $upstream...$orig_head ^$fork_point This allows us to correctly handle the scenario where we have the following topology: C --- D --- E <- dev / B <- master@{1} / o --- B' --- C* --- D* <- master where: - B' is a fixed-up version of B that is not patch-identical with B; - C* and D* are patch-identical to C and D respectively and conflict textually if applied in the wrong order; - E depends textually on D. The correct result of `git rebase master dev` is that B is identified as the fork-point of dev and master, so that C, D, E are the commits that need to be replayed onto master; but C and D are patch-identical with C* and D* and so can be dropped, so that the end result is: o --- B' --- C* --- D* --- E <- dev If the fork-point is not identified, then picking B onto a branch containing B' results in a conflict and if the patch-identical commits are not correctly identified then picking C onto a branch containing D (or equivalently D*) results in a conflict. This change allows us to handle both of these cases, where previously we either identified the fork-point (with `--fork-point`) but not the patch-identical commits *or* (with `--no-fork-point`) identified the patch-identical commits but not the fact that master had been rewritten. Reported-by: Ted Felix <ted@tedfelix.com> Signed-off-by: John Keeping <john@keeping.me.uk> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Diffstat (limited to 't/t3400-rebase.sh')
-rwxr-xr-xt/t3400-rebase.sh23
1 files changed, 23 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/t/t3400-rebase.sh b/t/t3400-rebase.sh
index 80e0a951ea..47b5682662 100755
--- a/t/t3400-rebase.sh
+++ b/t/t3400-rebase.sh
@@ -169,6 +169,29 @@ test_expect_success 'default to common base in @{upstream}s reflog if no upstrea
test_cmp expect actual
'
+test_expect_success 'cherry-picked commits and fork-point work together' '
+ git checkout default-base &&
+ echo Amended >A &&
+ git commit -a --no-edit --amend &&
+ test_commit B B &&
+ test_commit new_B B "New B" &&
+ test_commit C C &&
+ git checkout default &&
+ git reset --hard default-base@{4} &&
+ test_commit D D &&
+ git cherry-pick -2 default-base^ &&
+ test_commit final_B B "Final B" &&
+ git rebase &&
+ echo Amended >expect &&
+ test_cmp A expect &&
+ echo "Final B" >expect &&
+ test_cmp B expect &&
+ echo C >expect &&
+ test_cmp C expect &&
+ echo D >expect &&
+ test_cmp D expect
+'
+
test_expect_success 'rebase -q is quiet' '
git checkout -b quiet topic &&
git rebase -q master >output.out 2>&1 &&