diff options
author | Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> | 2010-10-03 13:59:59 -0600 |
---|---|---|
committer | Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> | 2010-10-06 13:26:11 -0700 |
commit | 892e6f7ea61e39d8504e3f227ee3ae874521f05c (patch) | |
tree | 4948f14e9ba239820ce5b6c2d92a69ec80872716 /t/t0000-basic.sh | |
parent | 6db2103f92cf6c5caeeddec0bfd5f57f94e81d81 (diff) | |
download | git-892e6f7ea61e39d8504e3f227ee3ae874521f05c.tar.gz |
test-lib: make test_expect_code a test command
Change test_expect_code to be a normal test command instead of a
top-level command.
As a top-level command it would fail in cases like:
test_expect_code 1 'phoney' '
foo && bar && (exit 1)
'
Here the test might incorrectly succeed if "foo" or "bar" happened to
fail with exit status 1. Instead we now do:
test_expect_success 'phoney' '
foo && bar && test_expect_code 1 "(exit 1)"
'
Which will only succeed if "foo" and "bar" return status 0, and "(exit
1)" returns status 1. Note that test_expect_code has been made slightly
noisier, as it reports the exit code it receives even upon success.
Some test code in t0000-basic.sh relied on the old semantics of
test_expect_code to test the test_when_finished command. I've
converted that code to use an external test similar to the TODO test I
added in v1.7.3-rc0~2^2~3.
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Diffstat (limited to 't/t0000-basic.sh')
-rwxr-xr-x | t/t0000-basic.sh | 55 |
1 files changed, 45 insertions, 10 deletions
diff --git a/t/t0000-basic.sh b/t/t0000-basic.sh index f688bd3ef5..2f7002a5e5 100755 --- a/t/t0000-basic.sh +++ b/t/t0000-basic.sh @@ -130,22 +130,57 @@ test_expect_success 'tests clean up after themselves' ' test_when_finished clean=yes ' -cleaner=no -test_expect_code 1 'tests clean up even after a failure' ' - test_when_finished cleaner=yes && - (exit 1) -' - -if test $clean$cleaner != yesyes +if test $clean != yes then - say "bug in test framework: cleanup commands do not work reliably" + say "bug in test framework: basic cleanup command does not work reliably" exit 1 fi -test_expect_code 2 'failure to clean up causes the test to fail' ' - test_when_finished "(exit 2)" +test_expect_success 'tests clean up even on failures' " + mkdir failing-cleanup && + (cd failing-cleanup && + cat >failing-cleanup.sh <<EOF && +#!$SHELL_PATH + +test_description='Failing tests with cleanup commands' + +# Point to the t/test-lib.sh, which isn't in ../ as usual +TEST_DIRECTORY=\"$TEST_DIRECTORY\" +. \"\$TEST_DIRECTORY\"/test-lib.sh + +test_expect_success 'tests clean up even after a failure' ' + touch clean-after-failure && + test_when_finished rm clean-after-failure && + (exit 1) +' + +test_expect_success 'failure to clean up causes the test to fail' ' + test_when_finished \"(exit 2)\" ' +test_done +EOF + chmod +x failing-cleanup.sh && + test_must_fail ./failing-cleanup.sh >out 2>err && + ! test -s err && + ! test -f \"trash directory.failing-cleanup/clean-after-failure\" && +sed -e 's/Z$//' >expect <<\EOF && +not ok - 1 tests clean up even after a failure +# Z +# touch clean-after-failure && +# test_when_finished rm clean-after-failure && +# (exit 1) +# Z +not ok - 2 failure to clean up causes the test to fail +# Z +# test_when_finished \"(exit 2)\" +# Z +# failed 2 among 2 test(s) +1..2 +EOF + test_cmp expect out) +" + ################################################################ # Basics of the basics |