merge-recursive: don't detect renames from empty filesjk/maint-1.7.7-merge-recursive-no-rename-empty

Merge-recursive detects renames so that if one side modifies
"foo" and the other side moves it to "bar", the modification
is applied to "bar". However, our rename detection is based
on content analysis, it can be wrong (i.e., two files were
not intended as a rename, but just happen to have the same
or similar content).

This is quite rare if the files actually contain content,
since two unrelated files are unlikely to have exactly the
same content.  However, empty files present a problem, in
that there is nothing to analyze. An uninteresting
placeholder file with zero bytes may or may not be related
to a placeholder file with another name.

The result is that adding content to an empty file may cause
confusion if the other side of a merge removed it; your
content may end up in another random placeholder file that
was added.

Let's err on the side of caution and not consider empty
files as renames. This will cause a modify/delete conflict
on the merge, which will let the user sort it out
themselves.

We could do the same thing for general diff rename
detection. However, the stakes are much less high there, as
we are explicitly reporting the rename to the user. It's
only the automatic nature of merge-recursive that makes the
result confusing. So there's not as much need for caution
when just showing a diff.

Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>

1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions

diff --git a/merge-recursive.c b/merge-recursive.c
index 5e2bc4fbd2..833b65536f 100644
--- a/merge-recursive.c
+++ b/merge-recursive.c
@@ -503,7 +503,7 @@ static struct string_list *get_renames(struct merge_options *o,
 		struct string_list_item *item;
 		struct rename *re;
 		struct diff_filepair *pair = diff_queued_diff.queue[i];
-		if (pair->status != 'R') {
+		if (pair->status != 'R' || is_empty_blob_sha1(pair->one->sha1)) {
 			diff_free_filepair(pair);
 			continue;
 		}