diff options
author | Johannes Sixt <johannes.sixt@telecom.at> | 2007-12-16 20:45:34 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> | 2007-12-16 19:26:12 -0800 |
commit | 50f22ada523f448986dd6273da14a477cea5a646 (patch) | |
tree | b4fbc54cfcedf89407dffd16602399348e77045f /builtin-pack-objects.c | |
parent | 3eb2a15eb385749fbfe59b4e37fc754416275760 (diff) | |
download | git-50f22ada523f448986dd6273da14a477cea5a646.tar.gz |
threaded pack-objects: Use condition variables for thread communication.
In the threaded pack-objects code the main thread and the worker threads
must mutually signal that they have assigned a new pack of work or have
completed their work, respectively. Previously, the code used mutexes that
were locked in one thread and unlocked from a different thread, which is
bogus (and happens to work on Linux).
Here we rectify the implementation by using condition variables: There is
one condition variable on which the main thread waits until a thread
requests new work; and each worker thread has its own condition variable
on which it waits until it is assigned new work or signaled to terminate.
As a cleanup, the worker threads are spawned only after the initial work
packages have been assigned.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Sixt <johannes.sixt@telecom.at>
Acked-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'builtin-pack-objects.c')
-rw-r--r-- | builtin-pack-objects.c | 129 |
1 files changed, 79 insertions, 50 deletions
diff --git a/builtin-pack-objects.c b/builtin-pack-objects.c index 7dd0d7f826..5765d02f54 100644 --- a/builtin-pack-objects.c +++ b/builtin-pack-objects.c @@ -1594,6 +1594,15 @@ static void find_deltas(struct object_entry **list, unsigned *list_size, #ifdef THREADED_DELTA_SEARCH +/* + * The main thread waits on the condition that (at least) one of the workers + * has stopped working (which is indicated in the .working member of + * struct thread_params). + * When a work thread has completed its work, it sets .working to 0 and + * signals the main thread and waits on the condition that .data_ready + * becomes 1. + */ + struct thread_params { pthread_t thread; struct object_entry **list; @@ -1601,37 +1610,50 @@ struct thread_params { unsigned remaining; int window; int depth; + int working; + int data_ready; + pthread_mutex_t mutex; + pthread_cond_t cond; unsigned *processed; }; -static pthread_mutex_t data_request = PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER; -static pthread_mutex_t data_ready = PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER; -static pthread_mutex_t data_provider = PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER; -static struct thread_params *data_requester; +static pthread_cond_t progress_cond = PTHREAD_COND_INITIALIZER; static void *threaded_find_deltas(void *arg) { struct thread_params *me = arg; - for (;;) { - pthread_mutex_lock(&data_request); - data_requester = me; - pthread_mutex_unlock(&data_provider); - pthread_mutex_lock(&data_ready); - pthread_mutex_unlock(&data_request); - - if (!me->remaining) - return NULL; - + while (me->remaining) { find_deltas(me->list, &me->remaining, me->window, me->depth, me->processed); + + progress_lock(); + me->working = 0; + pthread_cond_signal(&progress_cond); + progress_unlock(); + + /* + * We must not set ->data_ready before we wait on the + * condition because the main thread may have set it to 1 + * before we get here. In order to be sure that new + * work is available if we see 1 in ->data_ready, it + * was initialized to 0 before this thread was spawned + * and we reset it to 0 right away. + */ + pthread_mutex_lock(&me->mutex); + while (!me->data_ready) + pthread_cond_wait(&me->cond, &me->mutex); + me->data_ready = 0; + pthread_mutex_unlock(&me->mutex); } + /* leave ->working 1 so that this doesn't get more work assigned */ + return NULL; } static void ll_find_deltas(struct object_entry **list, unsigned list_size, int window, int depth, unsigned *processed) { - struct thread_params *target, p[delta_search_threads]; + struct thread_params p[delta_search_threads]; int i, ret, active_threads = 0; if (delta_search_threads <= 1) { @@ -1639,49 +1661,42 @@ static void ll_find_deltas(struct object_entry **list, unsigned list_size, return; } - pthread_mutex_lock(&data_provider); - pthread_mutex_lock(&data_ready); - - /* Start work threads. */ + /* Partition the work amongst work threads. */ for (i = 0; i < delta_search_threads; i++) { + unsigned sub_size = list_size / (delta_search_threads - i); + p[i].window = window; p[i].depth = depth; p[i].processed = processed; - p[i].remaining = 0; - ret = pthread_create(&p[i].thread, NULL, - threaded_find_deltas, &p[i]); - if (ret) - die("unable to create thread: %s", strerror(ret)); - active_threads++; - } - - /* Then partition the work amongst them. */ - for (i = 0; i < delta_search_threads; i++) { - unsigned sub_size = list_size / (delta_search_threads - i); - - pthread_mutex_lock(&data_provider); - target = data_requester; - if (!sub_size) { - pthread_mutex_unlock(&data_ready); - pthread_join(target->thread, NULL); - active_threads--; - continue; - } + p[i].working = 1; + p[i].data_ready = 0; + pthread_mutex_init(&p[i].mutex, NULL); + pthread_cond_init(&p[i].cond, NULL); /* try to split chunks on "path" boundaries */ while (sub_size < list_size && list[sub_size]->hash && list[sub_size]->hash == list[sub_size-1]->hash) sub_size++; - target->list = list; - target->list_size = sub_size; - target->remaining = sub_size; - pthread_mutex_unlock(&data_ready); + p[i].list = list; + p[i].list_size = sub_size; + p[i].remaining = sub_size; list += sub_size; list_size -= sub_size; } + /* Start work threads. */ + for (i = 0; i < delta_search_threads; i++) { + if (!p[i].list_size) + continue; + ret = pthread_create(&p[i].thread, NULL, + threaded_find_deltas, &p[i]); + if (ret) + die("unable to create thread: %s", strerror(ret)); + active_threads++; + } + /* * Now let's wait for work completion. Each time a thread is done * with its work, we steal half of the remaining work from the @@ -1690,13 +1705,21 @@ static void ll_find_deltas(struct object_entry **list, unsigned list_size, * until the remaining object list segments are simply too short * to be worth splitting anymore. */ - do { + while (active_threads) { + struct thread_params *target = NULL; struct thread_params *victim = NULL; unsigned sub_size = 0; - pthread_mutex_lock(&data_provider); - target = data_requester; progress_lock(); + for (;;) { + for (i = 0; !target && i < delta_search_threads; i++) + if (!p[i].working) + target = &p[i]; + if (target) + break; + pthread_cond_wait(&progress_cond, &progress_mutex); + } + for (i = 0; i < delta_search_threads; i++) if (p[i].remaining > 2*window && (!victim || victim->remaining < p[i].remaining)) @@ -1723,17 +1746,23 @@ static void ll_find_deltas(struct object_entry **list, unsigned list_size, victim->list_size -= sub_size; victim->remaining -= sub_size; } - progress_unlock(); - target->list_size = sub_size; target->remaining = sub_size; - pthread_mutex_unlock(&data_ready); + target->working = 1; + progress_unlock(); + + pthread_mutex_lock(&target->mutex); + target->data_ready = 1; + pthread_cond_signal(&target->cond); + pthread_mutex_unlock(&target->mutex); if (!sub_size) { pthread_join(target->thread, NULL); + pthread_cond_destroy(&target->cond); + pthread_mutex_destroy(&target->mutex); active_threads--; } - } while (active_threads); + } } #else |