diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/implicit8.C')
-rw-r--r-- | gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/implicit8.C | 34 |
1 files changed, 34 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/implicit8.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/implicit8.C new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..2f3febae8b2 --- /dev/null +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/implicit8.C @@ -0,0 +1,34 @@ +// The hack for PR c++/44909 breaks this testcase. We need feedback +// from the C++ committee to know how to proceed. +// { dg-options -std=c++0x } +// { dg-prune-output "implicitly deleted" } +// { dg-prune-output "cannot bind" } +// { dg-prune-output "initializing argument" } + +struct A +{ + A(); + A(A&); +}; + +struct B; +struct BP +{ + BP(const B&); +}; + +struct B +{ + B(); + B(B&&); + B(const BP&); +}; + +// If B(B&&) suppresses the B copy constructor, then copying the B +// subobject of C should use B(const BP&). But we ignore that constructor +// in order to break the cycle in 44909. Perhaps the move ctor shouldn't +// suppress the copy ctor? +struct C: A, B { }; + +C c; +C c2(c); // { dg-bogus "deleted" "" { xfail *-*-* } } |