diff options
author | dnovillo <dnovillo@138bc75d-0d04-0410-961f-82ee72b054a4> | 2004-05-13 06:41:07 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | dnovillo <dnovillo@138bc75d-0d04-0410-961f-82ee72b054a4> | 2004-05-13 06:41:07 +0000 |
commit | 4ee9c6840ad3fc92a9034343278a1e476ad6872a (patch) | |
tree | a2568888a519c077427b133de9ece5879a8484a5 /gcc/tree-ssa-forwprop.c | |
parent | ebb338380ab170c91e64d38038e6b5ce930d69a1 (diff) | |
download | gcc-4ee9c6840ad3fc92a9034343278a1e476ad6872a.tar.gz |
Merge tree-ssa-20020619-branch into mainline.
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk@81764 138bc75d-0d04-0410-961f-82ee72b054a4
Diffstat (limited to 'gcc/tree-ssa-forwprop.c')
-rw-r--r-- | gcc/tree-ssa-forwprop.c | 445 |
1 files changed, 445 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/gcc/tree-ssa-forwprop.c b/gcc/tree-ssa-forwprop.c new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..c50e879e975 --- /dev/null +++ b/gcc/tree-ssa-forwprop.c @@ -0,0 +1,445 @@ +/* Forward propagation of single use variables. + Copyright (C) 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc. + +This file is part of GCC. + +GCC is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify +it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by +the Free Software Foundation; either version 2, or (at your option) +any later version. + +GCC is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, +but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of +MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the +GNU General Public License for more details. + +You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License +along with GCC; see the file COPYING. If not, write to +the Free Software Foundation, 59 Temple Place - Suite 330, +Boston, MA 02111-1307, USA. */ + +#include "config.h" +#include "system.h" +#include "coretypes.h" +#include "tm.h" +#include "errors.h" +#include "ggc.h" +#include "tree.h" +#include "rtl.h" +#include "tm_p.h" +#include "basic-block.h" +#include "timevar.h" +#include "diagnostic.h" +#include "tree-flow.h" +#include "tree-pass.h" +#include "tree-dump.h" + +/* This pass performs simple forward propagation of single use variables + from their definition site into their single use site. + + Right now we only bother forward propagating into COND_EXPRs since those + are relatively common cases where forward propagation creates valid + gimple code without the expression needing to fold. ie + + bb0: + x = a COND b; + if (x) goto ... else goto ... + + Will be transformed into: + + bb0: + if (a COND b) goto ... else goto ... + + Similarly for the tests (x == 0), (x != 0), (x == 1) and (x != 1). + + Or (assuming c1 and c2 are constants): + + bb0: + x = a + c1; + if (x EQ/NEQ c2) goto ... else goto ... + + Will be transformed into: + + bb0: + if (a EQ/NEQ (c2 - c1)) goto ... else goto ... + + Similarly for x = a - c1. + + Or + + bb0: + x = !a + if (x) goto ... else goto ... + + Will be transformed into: + + bb0: + if (a == 0) goto ... else goto ... + + Similarly for the tests (x == 0), (x != 0), (x == 1) and (x != 1). + For these cases, we propagate A into all, possibly more than one, + COND_EXPRs that use X. + + In addition to eliminating the variable and the statement which assigns + a value to the variable, we may be able to later thread the jump without + adding insane complexity in the dominator optimizer. + + This will (of course) be extended as other needs arise. */ + +/* Bitmap of variables for which we want immediate uses. This is set + by record_single_argument_cond_exprs and tested in need_imm_uses_for. */ +static bitmap vars; + +static bool need_imm_uses_for (tree); +static void tree_ssa_forward_propagate_single_use_vars (void); +static varray_type record_single_argument_cond_exprs (void); +static void substitute_single_use_vars (varray_type); + +/* Function indicating whether we ought to include information for 'var' + when calculating immediate uses. */ + +static bool +need_imm_uses_for (tree var) +{ + return bitmap_bit_p (vars, SSA_NAME_VERSION (var)); +} + +/* Find all COND_EXPRs with a condition that is a naked SSA_NAME or + an equality comparison against a constant. + + Record the identified COND_EXPRs and the SSA_NAME used in the COND_EXPR + into a virtual array, which is returned to the caller. Also record + into VARS that we will need immediate uses for the identified SSA_NAME. + + The more uninteresting COND_EXPRs and associated SSA_NAMEs we can + filter out here, the faster this pass will run since its runtime is + dominated by the time to build immediate uses. */ + +static varray_type +record_single_argument_cond_exprs (void) +{ + basic_block bb; + varray_type retval; + + vars = BITMAP_XMALLOC (); + + VARRAY_TREE_INIT (retval, 10, "forward propagation vars"); + + /* The first pass over the blocks gathers the set of variables we need + immediate uses for as well as the set of interesting COND_EXPRs. + + A simpler implementation may be appropriate if/when we have a lower + overhead means of getting immediate use information. */ + FOR_EACH_BB (bb) + { + tree last = last_stmt (bb); + + /* See if this block ends in a COND_EXPR. */ + if (last && TREE_CODE (last) == COND_EXPR) + { + tree cond = COND_EXPR_COND (last); + enum tree_code cond_code = TREE_CODE (cond); + + /* If the condition is a lone variable or an equality test of + an SSA_NAME against an integral constant, then we may have an + optimizable case. + + Note these conditions also ensure the COND_EXPR has no + virtual operands or other side effects. */ + if (cond_code == SSA_NAME + || ((cond_code == EQ_EXPR || cond_code == NE_EXPR) + && TREE_CODE (TREE_OPERAND (cond, 0)) == SSA_NAME + && TREE_CODE_CLASS (TREE_CODE (TREE_OPERAND (cond, 1))) == 'c' + && INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (TREE_OPERAND (cond, 1))))) + { + tree def; + tree test_var; + + /* Extract the single variable used in the test into TEST_VAR. */ + if (cond_code == SSA_NAME) + test_var = cond; + else + test_var = TREE_OPERAND (cond, 0); + + /* If we have already recorded this SSA_NAME as interesting, + do not do so again. */ + if (bitmap_bit_p (vars, SSA_NAME_VERSION (test_var))) + continue; + + /* Now get the defining statement for TEST_VAR and see if it + something we are interested in. */ + def = SSA_NAME_DEF_STMT (test_var); + if (TREE_CODE (def) == MODIFY_EXPR) + { + tree def_rhs = TREE_OPERAND (def, 1); + + /* If TEST_VAR is set by adding or subtracting a constant + from an SSA_NAME, then it is interesting to us as we + can adjust the constant in the conditional and thus + eliminate the arithmetic operation. */ + if (TREE_CODE (def_rhs) == PLUS_EXPR + || TREE_CODE (def_rhs) == MINUS_EXPR) + { + tree op0 = TREE_OPERAND (def_rhs, 0); + tree op1 = TREE_OPERAND (def_rhs, 1); + + /* The first operand must be an SSA_NAME and the second + operand must be a constant. */ + if (TREE_CODE (op0) != SSA_NAME + || TREE_CODE_CLASS (TREE_CODE (op1)) != 'c' + || !INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (op1))) + continue; + } + + /* These cases require comparisons of a naked SSA_NAME or + comparison of an SSA_NAME against zero or one. */ + else if (TREE_CODE (cond) == SSA_NAME + || integer_zerop (TREE_OPERAND (cond, 1)) + || integer_onep (TREE_OPERAND (cond, 1))) + { + /* If TEST_VAR is set from a relational operation + between two SSA_NAMEs or a combination of an SSA_NAME + and a constant, then it is interesting. */ + if (TREE_CODE_CLASS (TREE_CODE (def_rhs)) == '<') + { + tree op0 = TREE_OPERAND (def_rhs, 0); + tree op1 = TREE_OPERAND (def_rhs, 1); + + /* Both operands of DEF_RHS must be SSA_NAMEs or + constants. */ + if ((TREE_CODE (op0) != SSA_NAME + && !is_gimple_min_invariant (op0)) + || (TREE_CODE (op1) != SSA_NAME + && !is_gimple_min_invariant (op1))) + continue; + } + + /* If TEST_VAR is set from a TRUTH_NOT_EXPR, then it + is interesting. */ + else if (TREE_CODE (def_rhs) == TRUTH_NOT_EXPR) + { + def_rhs = TREE_OPERAND (def_rhs, 0); + + /* DEF_RHS must be an SSA_NAME or constant. */ + if (TREE_CODE (def_rhs) != SSA_NAME + && !is_gimple_min_invariant (def_rhs)) + continue; + } + else + continue; + } + else + continue; + + /* All the tests passed, record TEST_VAR as interesting. */ + VARRAY_PUSH_TREE (retval, test_var); + bitmap_set_bit (vars, SSA_NAME_VERSION (test_var)); + } + } + } + } + return retval; +} + +/* Given FORWPROP_DATA containing SSA_NAMEs which are used in COND_EXPRs + that we may be able to optimize, attempt to rewrite the condition + in each COND_EXPR to use the RHS of the statement which defines the + SSA_NAME used in the COND_EXPR. */ + +static void +substitute_single_use_vars (varray_type forwprop_data) +{ + unsigned int i; + + for (i = 0; i < VARRAY_ACTIVE_SIZE (forwprop_data); i++) + { + tree test_var = VARRAY_TREE (forwprop_data, i); + tree def = SSA_NAME_DEF_STMT (test_var); + dataflow_t df; + int j, num_uses, propagated_uses; + block_stmt_iterator bsi; + + /* Now compute the immediate uses of TEST_VAR. */ + df = get_immediate_uses (def); + num_uses = num_immediate_uses (df); + propagated_uses = 0; + + /* If TEST_VAR is used more than once and is not a boolean set + via TRUTH_NOT_EXPR with another SSA_NAME as its argument, then + we can not optimize. */ + if (num_uses == 1 + || (TREE_CODE (TREE_TYPE (test_var)) == BOOLEAN_TYPE + && TREE_CODE (TREE_OPERAND (def, 1)) == TRUTH_NOT_EXPR + && (TREE_CODE (TREE_OPERAND (TREE_OPERAND (def, 1), 0)) + == SSA_NAME))) + ; + else + continue; + + /* Walk over each use and try to forward propagate the RHS of + DEF into the use. */ + for (j = 0; j < num_uses; j++) + { + tree cond_stmt; + tree cond; + enum tree_code cond_code; + tree def_rhs; + enum tree_code def_rhs_code; + tree new_cond; + + cond_stmt = immediate_use (df, j); + + /* For now we can only propagate into COND_EXPRs. */ + if (TREE_CODE (cond_stmt) != COND_EXPR) + continue; + + cond = COND_EXPR_COND (cond_stmt); + cond_code = TREE_CODE (cond); + def_rhs = TREE_OPERAND (def, 1); + def_rhs_code = TREE_CODE (def_rhs); + + /* If the definition of the single use variable was from an + arithmetic operation, then we just need to adjust the + constant in the COND_EXPR_COND and update the variable tested. */ + if (def_rhs_code == PLUS_EXPR || def_rhs_code == MINUS_EXPR) + { + tree op0 = TREE_OPERAND (def_rhs, 0); + tree op1 = TREE_OPERAND (def_rhs, 1); + enum tree_code new_code; + tree t; + + /* If the variable was defined via X + C, then we must subtract + C from the constant in the conditional. Otherwise we add + C to the constant in the conditional. The result must fold + into a valid gimple operand to be optimizable. */ + new_code = def_rhs_code == PLUS_EXPR ? MINUS_EXPR : PLUS_EXPR; + t = int_const_binop (new_code, TREE_OPERAND (cond, 1), op1, 0); + if (!is_gimple_val (t)) + continue; + + new_cond = build (cond_code, boolean_type_node, op0, t); + } + /* If the variable is defined by a conditional expression... */ + else if (TREE_CODE_CLASS (def_rhs_code) == '<') + { + /* TEST_VAR was set from a relational operator. */ + tree op0 = TREE_OPERAND (def_rhs, 0); + tree op1 = TREE_OPERAND (def_rhs, 1); + + new_cond = build (def_rhs_code, boolean_type_node, op0, op1); + + /* Invert the conditional if necessary. */ + if ((cond_code == EQ_EXPR + && integer_zerop (TREE_OPERAND (cond, 1))) + || (cond_code == NE_EXPR + && integer_onep (TREE_OPERAND (cond, 1)))) + { + new_cond = invert_truthvalue (new_cond); + + /* If we did not get a simple relational expression or + bare SSA_NAME, then we can not optimize this case. */ + if (TREE_CODE_CLASS (TREE_CODE (new_cond)) != '<' + && TREE_CODE (new_cond) != SSA_NAME) + continue; + } + } + else + { + /* TEST_VAR was set from a TRUTH_NOT_EXPR. */ + if (cond_code == SSA_NAME + || (cond_code == NE_EXPR + && integer_zerop (TREE_OPERAND (cond, 1))) + || (cond_code == EQ_EXPR + && integer_onep (TREE_OPERAND (cond, 1)))) + new_cond = build (EQ_EXPR, boolean_type_node, + TREE_OPERAND (def_rhs, 0), + convert (TREE_TYPE (def_rhs), + integer_zero_node)); + else + new_cond = build (NE_EXPR, boolean_type_node, + TREE_OPERAND (def_rhs, 0), + convert (TREE_TYPE (def_rhs), + integer_zero_node)); + } + + /* Dump details. */ + if (dump_file && (dump_flags & TDF_DETAILS)) + { + fprintf (dump_file, " Replaced '"); + print_generic_expr (dump_file, cond, dump_flags); + fprintf (dump_file, "' with '"); + print_generic_expr (dump_file, new_cond, dump_flags); + fprintf (dump_file, "'\n"); + } + + /* Replace the condition. */ + COND_EXPR_COND (cond_stmt) = new_cond; + modify_stmt (cond_stmt); + propagated_uses++; + } + + /* If we propagated into all the uses, then we can delete DEF. + Unfortunately, we have to find the defining statement in + whatever block it might be in. */ + if (num_uses && num_uses == propagated_uses) + for (bsi = bsi_start (bb_for_stmt (def)); + !bsi_end_p (bsi); + bsi_next (&bsi)) + { + if (def == bsi_stmt (bsi)) + { + bsi_remove (&bsi); + break; + } + } + } +} + +/* Main entry point for the forward propagation optimizer. */ + +static void +tree_ssa_forward_propagate_single_use_vars (void) +{ + varray_type forwprop_data; + + /* First get a list of all the interesting COND_EXPRs and potential single + use variables which feed those COND_EXPRs. */ + forwprop_data = record_single_argument_cond_exprs (); + + /* Now compute immediate uses for all the variables we care about. */ + compute_immediate_uses (TDFA_USE_OPS, need_imm_uses_for); + + /* We are done with the VARS bitmap and other dataflow information. */ + BITMAP_XFREE (vars); + vars = NULL; + + /* And optimize. */ + substitute_single_use_vars (forwprop_data); + + /* All done. Clean up. */ + free_df (); + VARRAY_CLEAR (forwprop_data); +} + + +static bool +gate_forwprop (void) +{ + return 1; +} + +struct tree_opt_pass pass_forwprop = { + "forwprop", /* name */ + gate_forwprop, /* gate */ + tree_ssa_forward_propagate_single_use_vars, /* execute */ + NULL, /* sub */ + NULL, /* next */ + 0, /* static_pass_number */ + TV_TREE_FORWPROP, /* tv_id */ + PROP_cfg | PROP_ssa, /* properties_required */ + 0, /* properties_provided */ + 0, /* properties_destroyed */ + 0, /* todo_flags_start */ + TODO_dump_func | TODO_ggc_collect /* todo_flags_finish */ + | TODO_verify_ssa +}; |