summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/gcc/cp
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorMartin Liska <mliska@suse.cz>2022-11-08 12:36:43 +0100
committerMartin Liska <mliska@suse.cz>2022-11-08 12:36:43 +0100
commit4b13c73bba935443be3207abf26f7ba05f79badc (patch)
treea6bb1525d07859fa8fc6f61dd13df7ddfd1ac254 /gcc/cp
parent33f5dde0cd15df9cf89b29280d4ff5fcf7b30e66 (diff)
parentfa271afb58423014e2feef9f15c1a87428e64ddc (diff)
downloadgcc-4b13c73bba935443be3207abf26f7ba05f79badc.tar.gz
Merge branch 'master' into devel/sphinxdevel/sphinx
Diffstat (limited to 'gcc/cp')
-rw-r--r--gcc/cp/call.cc109
-rw-r--r--gcc/cp/cp-tree.h1
-rw-r--r--gcc/cp/decl.cc66
-rw-r--r--gcc/cp/pt.cc5
4 files changed, 171 insertions, 10 deletions
diff --git a/gcc/cp/call.cc b/gcc/cp/call.cc
index 2c0fa37f53a..492db9b59ad 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/call.cc
+++ b/gcc/cp/call.cc
@@ -6232,6 +6232,7 @@ add_candidates (tree fns, tree first_arg, const vec<tree, va_gc> *args,
bool check_list_ctor = false;
bool check_converting = false;
unification_kind_t strict;
+ tree ne_fns = NULL_TREE;
if (!fns)
return;
@@ -6269,6 +6270,32 @@ add_candidates (tree fns, tree first_arg, const vec<tree, va_gc> *args,
ctype = conversion_path ? BINFO_TYPE (conversion_path) : NULL_TREE;
}
+ /* P2468: Check if operator== is a rewrite target with first operand
+ (*args)[0]; for now just do the lookups. */
+ if ((flags & (LOOKUP_REWRITTEN | LOOKUP_REVERSED))
+ && DECL_OVERLOADED_OPERATOR_IS (fn, EQ_EXPR))
+ {
+ tree ne_name = ovl_op_identifier (false, NE_EXPR);
+ if (DECL_CLASS_SCOPE_P (fn))
+ {
+ ne_fns = lookup_fnfields (TREE_TYPE ((*args)[0]), ne_name,
+ 1, tf_none);
+ if (ne_fns == error_mark_node || ne_fns == NULL_TREE)
+ ne_fns = NULL_TREE;
+ else
+ ne_fns = BASELINK_FUNCTIONS (ne_fns);
+ }
+ else
+ {
+ tree context = decl_namespace_context (fn);
+ ne_fns = lookup_qualified_name (context, ne_name, LOOK_want::NORMAL,
+ /*complain*/false);
+ if (ne_fns == error_mark_node
+ || !is_overloaded_fn (ne_fns))
+ ne_fns = NULL_TREE;
+ }
+ }
+
if (first_arg)
non_static_args = args;
else
@@ -6345,6 +6372,27 @@ add_candidates (tree fns, tree first_arg, const vec<tree, va_gc> *args,
continue;
}
+ /* When considering reversed operator==, if there's a corresponding
+ operator!= in the same scope, it's not a rewrite target. */
+ if (ne_fns)
+ {
+ bool found = false;
+ for (lkp_iterator ne (ne_fns); !found && ne; ++ne)
+ if (0 && !ne.using_p ()
+ && DECL_NAMESPACE_SCOPE_P (fn)
+ && DECL_CONTEXT (*ne) != DECL_CONTEXT (fn))
+ /* ??? This kludge excludes inline namespace members for the H
+ test in spaceship-eq15.C, but I don't see why we would want
+ that behavior. Asked Core 2022-11-04. Disabling for now. */;
+ else if (fns_correspond (fn, *ne))
+ {
+ found = true;
+ break;
+ }
+ if (found)
+ continue;
+ }
+
if (TREE_CODE (fn) == TEMPLATE_DECL)
{
if (!add_template_candidate (candidates,
@@ -6917,10 +6965,12 @@ build_new_op (const op_location_t &loc, enum tree_code code, int flags,
gcc_checking_assert (cand->reversed ());
gcc_fallthrough ();
case NE_EXPR:
+ if (result == error_mark_node)
+ ;
/* If a rewritten operator== candidate is selected by
overload resolution for an operator @, its return type
shall be cv bool.... */
- if (TREE_CODE (TREE_TYPE (result)) != BOOLEAN_TYPE)
+ else if (TREE_CODE (TREE_TYPE (result)) != BOOLEAN_TYPE)
{
if (complain & tf_error)
{
@@ -12488,10 +12538,53 @@ joust (struct z_candidate *cand1, struct z_candidate *cand2, bool warn,
if (winner && comp != winner)
{
/* Ambiguity between normal and reversed comparison operators
- with the same parameter types; prefer the normal one. */
- if ((cand1->reversed () != cand2->reversed ())
+ with the same parameter types. P2468 decided not to go with
+ this approach to resolving the ambiguity, so pedwarn. */
+ if ((complain & tf_warning_or_error)
+ && (cand1->reversed () != cand2->reversed ())
&& cand_parms_match (cand1, cand2))
- return cand1->reversed () ? -1 : 1;
+ {
+ struct z_candidate *w, *l;
+ if (cand2->reversed ())
+ winner = 1, w = cand1, l = cand2;
+ else
+ winner = -1, w = cand2, l = cand1;
+ if (warn)
+ {
+ auto_diagnostic_group d;
+ if (pedwarn (input_location, 0,
+ "C++20 says that these are ambiguous, "
+ "even though the second is reversed:"))
+ {
+ print_z_candidate (input_location,
+ N_("candidate 1:"), w);
+ print_z_candidate (input_location,
+ N_("candidate 2:"), l);
+ if (w->fn == l->fn
+ && DECL_NONSTATIC_MEMBER_FUNCTION_P (w->fn)
+ && (type_memfn_quals (TREE_TYPE (w->fn))
+ & TYPE_QUAL_CONST) == 0)
+ {
+ /* Suggest adding const to
+ struct A { bool operator==(const A&); }; */
+ tree parmtype
+ = FUNCTION_FIRST_USER_PARMTYPE (w->fn);
+ parmtype = TREE_VALUE (parmtype);
+ if (TYPE_REF_P (parmtype)
+ && TYPE_READONLY (TREE_TYPE (parmtype))
+ && (same_type_ignoring_top_level_qualifiers_p
+ (TREE_TYPE (parmtype),
+ DECL_CONTEXT (w->fn))))
+ inform (DECL_SOURCE_LOCATION (w->fn),
+ "try making the operator a %<const%> "
+ "member function");
+ }
+ }
+ }
+ else
+ add_warning (w, l);
+ return winner;
+ }
winner = 0;
goto tweak;
@@ -12880,7 +12973,7 @@ tourney (struct z_candidate *candidates, tsubst_flags_t complain)
{
struct z_candidate *champ = candidates, *challenger;
int fate;
- int champ_compared_to_predecessor = 0;
+ struct z_candidate *champ_compared_to_predecessor = nullptr;
/* Walk through the list once, comparing each current champ to the next
candidate, knocking out a candidate or two with each comparison. */
@@ -12897,12 +12990,12 @@ tourney (struct z_candidate *candidates, tsubst_flags_t complain)
champ = challenger->next;
if (champ == 0)
return NULL;
- champ_compared_to_predecessor = 0;
+ champ_compared_to_predecessor = nullptr;
}
else
{
+ champ_compared_to_predecessor = champ;
champ = challenger;
- champ_compared_to_predecessor = 1;
}
challenger = champ->next;
@@ -12914,7 +13007,7 @@ tourney (struct z_candidate *candidates, tsubst_flags_t complain)
for (challenger = candidates;
challenger != champ
- && !(champ_compared_to_predecessor && challenger->next == champ);
+ && challenger != champ_compared_to_predecessor;
challenger = challenger->next)
{
fate = joust (champ, challenger, 0, complain);
diff --git a/gcc/cp/cp-tree.h b/gcc/cp/cp-tree.h
index d13bb3d4c0e..bbc8be21900 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/cp-tree.h
+++ b/gcc/cp/cp-tree.h
@@ -6820,6 +6820,7 @@ extern void note_break_stmt (void);
extern bool note_iteration_stmt_body_start (void);
extern void note_iteration_stmt_body_end (bool);
extern void determine_local_discriminator (tree);
+extern bool fns_correspond (tree, tree);
extern int decls_match (tree, tree, bool = true);
extern bool maybe_version_functions (tree, tree, bool);
extern bool merge_default_template_args (tree, tree, bool);
diff --git a/gcc/cp/decl.cc b/gcc/cp/decl.cc
index 6e98ea35a39..890cfcabd35 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/decl.cc
+++ b/gcc/cp/decl.cc
@@ -980,6 +980,72 @@ function_requirements_equivalent_p (tree newfn, tree oldfn)
return cp_tree_equal (reqs1, reqs2);
}
+/* Two functions of the same name correspond [basic.scope.scope] if
+
+ + both declare functions with the same non-object-parameter-type-list,
+ equivalent ([temp.over.link]) trailing requires-clauses (if any, except as
+ specified in [temp.friend]), and, if both are non-static members, they have
+ corresponding object parameters, or
+
+ + both declare function templates with equivalent
+ non-object-parameter-type-lists, return types (if any), template-heads, and
+ trailing requires-clauses (if any), and, if both are non-static members,
+ they have corresponding object parameters.
+
+ This is a subset of decls_match: it identifies declarations that cannot be
+ overloaded with one another. This function does not consider DECL_NAME. */
+
+bool
+fns_correspond (tree newdecl, tree olddecl)
+{
+ if (TREE_CODE (newdecl) != TREE_CODE (olddecl))
+ return false;
+
+ if (TREE_CODE (newdecl) == TEMPLATE_DECL)
+ {
+ if (!template_heads_equivalent_p (newdecl, olddecl))
+ return 0;
+ newdecl = DECL_TEMPLATE_RESULT (newdecl);
+ olddecl = DECL_TEMPLATE_RESULT (olddecl);
+ }
+
+ tree f1 = TREE_TYPE (newdecl);
+ tree f2 = TREE_TYPE (olddecl);
+
+ int rq1 = type_memfn_rqual (f1);
+ int rq2 = type_memfn_rqual (f2);
+
+ /* If only one is a non-static member function, ignore ref-quals. */
+ if (TREE_CODE (f1) != TREE_CODE (f2))
+ rq1 = rq2;
+ /* Two non-static member functions have corresponding object parameters if:
+ + exactly one is an implicit object member function with no ref-qualifier
+ and the types of their object parameters ([dcl.fct]), after removing
+ top-level references, are the same, or
+ + their object parameters have the same type. */
+ /* ??? We treat member functions of different classes as corresponding even
+ though that means the object parameters have different types. */
+ else if ((rq1 == REF_QUAL_NONE) != (rq2 == REF_QUAL_NONE))
+ rq1 = rq2;
+
+ bool types_match = rq1 == rq2;
+
+ if (types_match)
+ {
+ tree p1 = FUNCTION_FIRST_USER_PARMTYPE (newdecl);
+ tree p2 = FUNCTION_FIRST_USER_PARMTYPE (olddecl);
+ types_match = compparms (p1, p2);
+ }
+
+ /* Two function declarations match if either has a requires-clause
+ then both have a requires-clause and their constraints-expressions
+ are equivalent. */
+ if (types_match && flag_concepts)
+ types_match = function_requirements_equivalent_p (newdecl, olddecl);
+
+ return types_match;
+}
+
/* Subroutine of duplicate_decls: return truthvalue of whether
or not types of these decls match.
diff --git a/gcc/cp/pt.cc b/gcc/cp/pt.cc
index c3fc56a13ff..57917de321f 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/pt.cc
+++ b/gcc/cp/pt.cc
@@ -20937,8 +20937,9 @@ tsubst_copy_and_build (tree t,
/* In a lambda fn, we have to be careful to not
introduce new this captures. Legacy code can't
be using lambdas anyway, so it's ok to be
- stricter. Be strict with C++20 template-id ADL too. */
- bool strict = in_lambda || template_id_p;
+ stricter. Be strict with C++20 template-id ADL too.
+ And be strict if we're already failing anyway. */
+ bool strict = in_lambda || template_id_p || seen_error();
bool diag = true;
if (strict)
error_at (cp_expr_loc_or_input_loc (t),