summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/gcc/bb-reorder.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorrth <rth@138bc75d-0d04-0410-961f-82ee72b054a4>2011-07-16 03:11:28 +0000
committerrth <rth@138bc75d-0d04-0410-961f-82ee72b054a4>2011-07-16 03:11:28 +0000
commit2a8e5eebabdfc6f67341798aa343f74d92be9155 (patch)
tree93511d20a3ae241fcf7429cad83efcd8717d4a16 /gcc/bb-reorder.c
parent229f696ea30b2686d3d6096e7c3886d47e3b0d5a (diff)
downloadgcc-2a8e5eebabdfc6f67341798aa343f74d92be9155.tar.gz
bbpart: Use a VEC for crossing_edges.
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk@176349 138bc75d-0d04-0410-961f-82ee72b054a4
Diffstat (limited to 'gcc/bb-reorder.c')
-rw-r--r--gcc/bb-reorder.c270
1 files changed, 110 insertions, 160 deletions
diff --git a/gcc/bb-reorder.c b/gcc/bb-reorder.c
index 6d2aedbb63a..81369eaf38e 100644
--- a/gcc/bb-reorder.c
+++ b/gcc/bb-reorder.c
@@ -182,15 +182,6 @@ static void connect_traces (int, struct trace *);
static bool copy_bb_p (const_basic_block, int);
static int get_uncond_jump_length (void);
static bool push_to_next_round_p (const_basic_block, int, int, int, gcov_type);
-static void find_rarely_executed_basic_blocks_and_crossing_edges (edge **,
- int *,
- int *);
-static void add_labels_and_missing_jumps (edge *, int);
-static void add_reg_crossing_jump_notes (void);
-static void fix_up_fall_thru_edges (void);
-static void fix_edges_for_rarely_executed_code (edge *, int);
-static void fix_crossing_conditional_branches (void);
-static void fix_crossing_unconditional_branches (void);
/* Check to see if bb should be pushed into the next round of trace
collections or not. Reasons for pushing the block forward are 1).
@@ -1219,16 +1210,14 @@ get_uncond_jump_length (void)
/* Find the basic blocks that are rarely executed and need to be moved to
a separate section of the .o file (to cut down on paging and improve
- cache locality). */
+ cache locality). Return a vector of all edges that cross. */
-static void
-find_rarely_executed_basic_blocks_and_crossing_edges (edge **crossing_edges,
- int *n_crossing_edges,
- int *max_idx)
+static VEC(edge, heap) *
+find_rarely_executed_basic_blocks_and_crossing_edges (void)
{
+ VEC(edge, heap) *crossing_edges = NULL;
basic_block bb;
edge e;
- int i;
edge_iterator ei;
/* Mark which partition (hot/cold) each basic block belongs in. */
@@ -1243,7 +1232,6 @@ find_rarely_executed_basic_blocks_and_crossing_edges (edge **crossing_edges,
/* Mark every edge that crosses between sections. */
- i = 0;
FOR_EACH_BB (bb)
FOR_EACH_EDGE (e, ei, bb->succs)
{
@@ -1252,77 +1240,62 @@ find_rarely_executed_basic_blocks_and_crossing_edges (edge **crossing_edges,
&& BB_PARTITION (e->src) != BB_PARTITION (e->dest))
{
e->flags |= EDGE_CROSSING;
- if (i == *max_idx)
- {
- *max_idx *= 2;
- *crossing_edges = XRESIZEVEC (edge, *crossing_edges, *max_idx);
- }
- (*crossing_edges)[i++] = e;
+ VEC_safe_push (edge, heap, crossing_edges, e);
}
else
e->flags &= ~EDGE_CROSSING;
}
- *n_crossing_edges = i;
+
+ return crossing_edges;
}
/* If any destination of a crossing edge does not have a label, add label;
- Convert any fall-through crossing edges (for blocks that do not contain
- a jump) to unconditional jumps. */
+ Convert any easy fall-through crossing edges to unconditional jumps. */
static void
-add_labels_and_missing_jumps (edge *crossing_edges, int n_crossing_edges)
+add_labels_and_missing_jumps (VEC(edge, heap) *crossing_edges)
{
- int i;
- basic_block src;
- basic_block dest;
- rtx label;
- rtx barrier;
- rtx new_jump;
+ size_t i;
+ edge e;
- for (i=0; i < n_crossing_edges; i++)
+ FOR_EACH_VEC_ELT (edge, crossing_edges, i, e)
{
- if (crossing_edges[i])
- {
- src = crossing_edges[i]->src;
- dest = crossing_edges[i]->dest;
+ basic_block src = e->src;
+ basic_block dest = e->dest;
+ rtx label, barrier, new_jump;
- /* Make sure dest has a label. */
+ if (dest == EXIT_BLOCK_PTR)
+ continue;
- if (dest && (dest != EXIT_BLOCK_PTR))
- {
- label = block_label (dest);
+ /* Make sure dest has a label. */
+ label = block_label (dest);
- /* Make sure source block ends with a jump. If the
- source block does not end with a jump it might end
- with a call_insn; this case will be handled in
- fix_up_fall_thru_edges function. */
+ /* Nothing to do for non-fallthru edges. */
+ if (src == ENTRY_BLOCK_PTR)
+ continue;
+ if ((e->flags & EDGE_FALLTHRU) == 0)
+ continue;
- if (src && (src != ENTRY_BLOCK_PTR))
- {
- if (!JUMP_P (BB_END (src))
- && !block_ends_with_call_p (src)
- && !can_throw_internal (BB_END (src)))
- /* bb just falls through. */
- {
- /* make sure there's only one successor */
- gcc_assert (single_succ_p (src));
-
- /* Find label in dest block. */
- label = block_label (dest);
-
- new_jump = emit_jump_insn_after (gen_jump (label),
- BB_END (src));
- barrier = emit_barrier_after (new_jump);
- JUMP_LABEL (new_jump) = label;
- LABEL_NUSES (label) += 1;
- src->il.rtl->footer = unlink_insn_chain (barrier, barrier);
- /* Mark edge as non-fallthru. */
- crossing_edges[i]->flags &= ~EDGE_FALLTHRU;
- } /* end: 'if (!JUMP_P ... ' */
- } /* end: 'if (src && src !=...' */
- } /* end: 'if (dest && dest !=...' */
- } /* end: 'if (crossing_edges[i]...' */
- } /* end for loop */
+ /* If the block does not end with a control flow insn, then we
+ can trivially add a jump to the end to fixup the crossing.
+ Otherwise the jump will have to go in a new bb, which will
+ be handled by fix_up_fall_thru_edges function. */
+ if (control_flow_insn_p (BB_END (src)))
+ continue;
+
+ /* Make sure there's only one successor. */
+ gcc_assert (single_succ_p (src));
+
+ new_jump = emit_jump_insn_after (gen_jump (label), BB_END (src));
+ BB_END (src) = new_jump;
+ barrier = emit_barrier_after (new_jump);
+ JUMP_LABEL (new_jump) = label;
+ LABEL_NUSES (label) += 1;
+ src->il.rtl->footer = unlink_insn_chain (barrier, barrier);
+
+ /* Mark edge as non-fallthru. */
+ e->flags &= ~EDGE_FALLTHRU;
+ }
}
/* Find any bb's where the fall-through edge is a crossing edge (note that
@@ -1796,71 +1769,6 @@ add_reg_crossing_jump_notes (void)
add_reg_note (BB_END (e->src), REG_CROSSING_JUMP, NULL_RTX);
}
-/* Hot and cold basic blocks are partitioned and put in separate
- sections of the .o file, to reduce paging and improve cache
- performance (hopefully). This can result in bits of code from the
- same function being widely separated in the .o file. However this
- is not obvious to the current bb structure. Therefore we must take
- care to ensure that: 1). There are no fall_thru edges that cross
- between sections; 2). For those architectures which have "short"
- conditional branches, all conditional branches that attempt to
- cross between sections are converted to unconditional branches;
- and, 3). For those architectures which have "short" unconditional
- branches, all unconditional branches that attempt to cross between
- sections are converted to indirect jumps.
-
- The code for fixing up fall_thru edges that cross between hot and
- cold basic blocks does so by creating new basic blocks containing
- unconditional branches to the appropriate label in the "other"
- section. The new basic block is then put in the same (hot or cold)
- section as the original conditional branch, and the fall_thru edge
- is modified to fall into the new basic block instead. By adding
- this level of indirection we end up with only unconditional branches
- crossing between hot and cold sections.
-
- Conditional branches are dealt with by adding a level of indirection.
- A new basic block is added in the same (hot/cold) section as the
- conditional branch, and the conditional branch is retargeted to the
- new basic block. The new basic block contains an unconditional branch
- to the original target of the conditional branch (in the other section).
-
- Unconditional branches are dealt with by converting them into
- indirect jumps. */
-
-static void
-fix_edges_for_rarely_executed_code (edge *crossing_edges,
- int n_crossing_edges)
-{
- /* Make sure the source of any crossing edge ends in a jump and the
- destination of any crossing edge has a label. */
-
- add_labels_and_missing_jumps (crossing_edges, n_crossing_edges);
-
- /* Convert all crossing fall_thru edges to non-crossing fall
- thrus to unconditional jumps (that jump to the original fall
- thru dest). */
-
- fix_up_fall_thru_edges ();
-
- /* If the architecture does not have conditional branches that can
- span all of memory, convert crossing conditional branches into
- crossing unconditional branches. */
-
- if (!HAS_LONG_COND_BRANCH)
- fix_crossing_conditional_branches ();
-
- /* If the architecture does not have unconditional branches that
- can span all of memory, convert crossing unconditional branches
- into indirect jumps. Since adding an indirect jump also adds
- a new register usage, update the register usage information as
- well. */
-
- if (!HAS_LONG_UNCOND_BRANCH)
- fix_crossing_unconditional_branches ();
-
- add_reg_crossing_jump_notes ();
-}
-
/* Verify, in the basic block chain, that there is at most one switch
between hot/cold partitions. This is modelled on
rtl_verify_flow_info_1, but it cannot go inside that function
@@ -2178,28 +2086,79 @@ struct rtl_opt_pass pass_duplicate_computed_gotos =
if we could perform this optimization later in the compilation, but
unfortunately the fact that we may need to create indirect jumps
(through registers) requires that this optimization be performed
- before register allocation. */
+ before register allocation.
-static void
+ Hot and cold basic blocks are partitioned and put in separate
+ sections of the .o file, to reduce paging and improve cache
+ performance (hopefully). This can result in bits of code from the
+ same function being widely separated in the .o file. However this
+ is not obvious to the current bb structure. Therefore we must take
+ care to ensure that: 1). There are no fall_thru edges that cross
+ between sections; 2). For those architectures which have "short"
+ conditional branches, all conditional branches that attempt to
+ cross between sections are converted to unconditional branches;
+ and, 3). For those architectures which have "short" unconditional
+ branches, all unconditional branches that attempt to cross between
+ sections are converted to indirect jumps.
+
+ The code for fixing up fall_thru edges that cross between hot and
+ cold basic blocks does so by creating new basic blocks containing
+ unconditional branches to the appropriate label in the "other"
+ section. The new basic block is then put in the same (hot or cold)
+ section as the original conditional branch, and the fall_thru edge
+ is modified to fall into the new basic block instead. By adding
+ this level of indirection we end up with only unconditional branches
+ crossing between hot and cold sections.
+
+ Conditional branches are dealt with by adding a level of indirection.
+ A new basic block is added in the same (hot/cold) section as the
+ conditional branch, and the conditional branch is retargeted to the
+ new basic block. The new basic block contains an unconditional branch
+ to the original target of the conditional branch (in the other section).
+
+ Unconditional branches are dealt with by converting them into
+ indirect jumps. */
+
+static unsigned
partition_hot_cold_basic_blocks (void)
{
- edge *crossing_edges;
- int n_crossing_edges;
- int max_edges = 2 * last_basic_block;
+ VEC(edge, heap) *crossing_edges;
if (n_basic_blocks <= NUM_FIXED_BLOCKS + 1)
- return;
+ return 0;
+
+ crossing_edges = find_rarely_executed_basic_blocks_and_crossing_edges ();
+ if (crossing_edges == NULL)
+ return 0;
+
+ /* Make sure the source of any crossing edge ends in a jump and the
+ destination of any crossing edge has a label. */
+ add_labels_and_missing_jumps (crossing_edges);
+
+ /* Convert all crossing fall_thru edges to non-crossing fall
+ thrus to unconditional jumps (that jump to the original fall
+ thru dest). */
+ fix_up_fall_thru_edges ();
+
+ /* If the architecture does not have conditional branches that can
+ span all of memory, convert crossing conditional branches into
+ crossing unconditional branches. */
+ if (!HAS_LONG_COND_BRANCH)
+ fix_crossing_conditional_branches ();
- crossing_edges = XCNEWVEC (edge, max_edges);
+ /* If the architecture does not have unconditional branches that
+ can span all of memory, convert crossing unconditional branches
+ into indirect jumps. Since adding an indirect jump also adds
+ a new register usage, update the register usage information as
+ well. */
+ if (!HAS_LONG_UNCOND_BRANCH)
+ fix_crossing_unconditional_branches ();
- find_rarely_executed_basic_blocks_and_crossing_edges (&crossing_edges,
- &n_crossing_edges,
- &max_edges);
+ add_reg_crossing_jump_notes ();
- if (n_crossing_edges > 0)
- fix_edges_for_rarely_executed_code (crossing_edges, n_crossing_edges);
+ VEC_free (edge, heap, crossing_edges);
- free (crossing_edges);
+ return TODO_verify_flow | TODO_verify_rtl_sharing;
}
static bool
@@ -2271,27 +2230,18 @@ gate_handle_partition_blocks (void)
sections of the .o file does not work well with linkonce or with
user defined section attributes. Don't call it if either case
arises. */
-
return (flag_reorder_blocks_and_partition
&& !DECL_ONE_ONLY (current_function_decl)
&& !user_defined_section_attribute);
}
-/* Partition hot and cold basic blocks. */
-static unsigned int
-rest_of_handle_partition_blocks (void)
-{
- partition_hot_cold_basic_blocks ();
- return 0;
-}
-
struct rtl_opt_pass pass_partition_blocks =
{
{
RTL_PASS,
"bbpart", /* name */
gate_handle_partition_blocks, /* gate */
- rest_of_handle_partition_blocks, /* execute */
+ partition_hot_cold_basic_blocks, /* execute */
NULL, /* sub */
NULL, /* next */
0, /* static_pass_number */
@@ -2300,6 +2250,6 @@ struct rtl_opt_pass pass_partition_blocks =
0, /* properties_provided */
0, /* properties_destroyed */
0, /* todo_flags_start */
- TODO_verify_rtl_sharing /* todo_flags_finish */
+ 0 /* todo_flags_finish */
}
};