diff options
author | charlet <charlet@138bc75d-0d04-0410-961f-82ee72b054a4> | 2007-12-19 16:22:40 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | charlet <charlet@138bc75d-0d04-0410-961f-82ee72b054a4> | 2007-12-19 16:22:40 +0000 |
commit | 8f6e4fd5198fe412bfe9e39f4ef8262a3feea6ba (patch) | |
tree | 332b098dbd6b86d59d72a861304c31b6b5b32d63 /gcc/ada/atree.adb | |
parent | 959a86c677baec8142b74c3de2ac67bd24d19604 (diff) | |
download | gcc-8f6e4fd5198fe412bfe9e39f4ef8262a3feea6ba.tar.gz |
2007-12-19 Bob Duff <duff@adacore.com>
* atree.ads, atree.adb (Traverse_Func): Walk Field2 last, and eliminate
the resulting tail recursion by hand. This prevents running out of
memory on deeply nested concatenations, since Field2 is where the left
operand of concatenations is stored.
Fix bug (was returning OK_Orig in some cases). Fix return subtype to
clarify that it can only return OK or Abandon.
* sem_res.adb (Resolve_Op_Concat): Replace the recursion on the left
operand by iteration, in order to avoid running out of memory on
deeply-nested concatenations. Use the Parent pointer to get back up the
tree.
(Resolve_Op_Concat_Arg, Resolve_Op_Concat_First,
Resolve_Op_Concat_Rest): New procedures split out of
Resolve_Op_Concat, so the iterative algorithm in Resolve_Op_Concat is
clearer.
* checks.adb (Remove_Checks): Use Traverse_Proc instead of
Traverse_Func, because the former already takes care of discarding the
result.
* errout.adb (First_Node): Use Traverse_Proc instead of Traverse_Func,
because the former already takes care of discarding the result.
(Remove_Warning_Messages): Use appropriate subtype for Status and
Discard
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk@131070 138bc75d-0d04-0410-961f-82ee72b054a4
Diffstat (limited to 'gcc/ada/atree.adb')
-rw-r--r-- | gcc/ada/atree.adb | 81 |
1 files changed, 44 insertions, 37 deletions
diff --git a/gcc/ada/atree.adb b/gcc/ada/atree.adb index 322528c4b9c..414fd62d734 100644 --- a/gcc/ada/atree.adb +++ b/gcc/ada/atree.adb @@ -2624,12 +2624,12 @@ package body Atree is -- Traverse_Func -- ------------------- - function Traverse_Func (Node : Node_Id) return Traverse_Result is + function Traverse_Func (Node : Node_Id) return Traverse_Final_Result is function Traverse_Field (Nod : Node_Id; Fld : Union_Id; - FN : Field_Num) return Traverse_Result; + FN : Field_Num) return Traverse_Final_Result; -- Fld is one of the fields of Nod. If the field points to syntactic -- node or list, then this node or list is traversed, and the result is -- the result of this traversal. Otherwise a value of True is returned @@ -2642,7 +2642,7 @@ package body Atree is function Traverse_Field (Nod : Node_Id; Fld : Union_Id; - FN : Field_Num) return Traverse_Result + FN : Field_Num) return Traverse_Final_Result is begin if Fld = Union_Id (Empty) then @@ -2697,10 +2697,21 @@ package body Atree is end if; end Traverse_Field; + Cur_Node : Node_Id := Node; + -- Start of processing for Traverse_Func begin - case Process (Node) is + -- We walk Field2 last, and if it is a node, we eliminate the tail + -- recursion by jumping back to this label. This is because Field2 is + -- where the Left_Opnd field of N_Op_Concat is stored, and in practice + -- concatenations are sometimes deeply nested, as in X1&X2&...&XN. This + -- trick prevents us from running out of memory in that case. We don't + -- bother eliminating the tail recursion if Field2 is a list. + + <<Tail_Recurse>> + + case Process (Cur_Node) is when Abandon => return Abandon; @@ -2708,41 +2719,37 @@ package body Atree is return OK; when OK => - if Traverse_Field (Node, Union_Id (Field1 (Node)), 1) = Abandon - or else - Traverse_Field (Node, Union_Id (Field2 (Node)), 2) = Abandon - or else - Traverse_Field (Node, Union_Id (Field3 (Node)), 3) = Abandon - or else - Traverse_Field (Node, Union_Id (Field4 (Node)), 4) = Abandon - or else - Traverse_Field (Node, Union_Id (Field5 (Node)), 5) = Abandon - then - return Abandon; - else - return OK; - end if; + null; when OK_Orig => - declare - Onod : constant Node_Id := Original_Node (Node); - begin - if Traverse_Field (Onod, Union_Id (Field1 (Onod)), 1) = Abandon - or else - Traverse_Field (Onod, Union_Id (Field2 (Onod)), 2) = Abandon - or else - Traverse_Field (Onod, Union_Id (Field3 (Onod)), 3) = Abandon - or else - Traverse_Field (Onod, Union_Id (Field4 (Onod)), 4) = Abandon - or else - Traverse_Field (Onod, Union_Id (Field5 (Onod)), 5) = Abandon - then - return Abandon; - else - return OK_Orig; - end if; - end; + Cur_Node := Original_Node (Cur_Node); end case; + + if Traverse_Field (Cur_Node, Field1 (Cur_Node), 1) = Abandon + or else -- skip Field2 here + Traverse_Field (Cur_Node, Field3 (Cur_Node), 3) = Abandon + or else + Traverse_Field (Cur_Node, Field4 (Cur_Node), 4) = Abandon + or else + Traverse_Field (Cur_Node, Field5 (Cur_Node), 5) = Abandon + then + return Abandon; + end if; + + if Field2 (Cur_Node) not in Node_Range then + return Traverse_Field (Cur_Node, Field2 (Cur_Node), 2); + elsif Is_Syntactic_Field (Nkind (Cur_Node), 2) and then + Field2 (Cur_Node) /= Empty_List_Or_Node + then + -- Here is the tail recursion step, we reset Cur_Node and jump + -- back to the start of the procedure, which has the same + -- semantic effect as a call. + + Cur_Node := Node_Id (Field2 (Cur_Node)); + goto Tail_Recurse; + end if; + + return OK; end Traverse_Func; ------------------- @@ -2751,7 +2758,7 @@ package body Atree is procedure Traverse_Proc (Node : Node_Id) is function Traverse is new Traverse_Func (Process); - Discard : Traverse_Result; + Discard : Traverse_Final_Result; pragma Warnings (Off, Discard); begin Discard := Traverse (Node); |