diff options
author | mmitchel <mmitchel@138bc75d-0d04-0410-961f-82ee72b054a4> | 2003-08-03 14:51:42 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | mmitchel <mmitchel@138bc75d-0d04-0410-961f-82ee72b054a4> | 2003-08-03 14:51:42 +0000 |
commit | 5d982d498c7f0154fd61f9119805b8c8a705055e (patch) | |
tree | f7a375ab69bd449b0839b80d41fec6ed76e2d010 /README.SCO | |
parent | 66603c97d9b4783e23aa6dd6cceb6dd32f181af0 (diff) | |
download | gcc-5d982d498c7f0154fd61f9119805b8c8a705055e.tar.gz |
* README.SCO: New file.
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk@70122 138bc75d-0d04-0410-961f-82ee72b054a4
Diffstat (limited to 'README.SCO')
-rw-r--r-- | README.SCO | 27 |
1 files changed, 27 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/README.SCO b/README.SCO new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..f86b82b689c --- /dev/null +++ b/README.SCO @@ -0,0 +1,27 @@ +As all users of GCC will know, SCO has recently made claims concerning +alleged copyright infringement by recent versions of the operating +system kernel called Linux. SCO has made irresponsible public +statements about this supposed copyright infringement without +releasing any evidence of the infringement, and has demanded that +users of Linux, the kernel most often used with the GNU system, pay +for a license. This license is incompatible with the GPL, and in the +opinion of the Free Software Foundation such a demand unquestionably +violates the GNU General Public License under which the kernel is +distributed. + +We have been urged to drop support for SCO Unix from this release of +GCC, as a protest against this irresponsible aggression against free +software and GNU/Linux. However, the direct effect of this action +would fall on users of GCC rather than on SCO. For the moment, we +have decided not to take that action. The Free Software Foundation's +overriding goal is to protect the freedom of the free software +community, including developers and users, but we also want to serve +users. Protecting the community from an attack sometimes requires +steps that will inconvenience some in the community. Such a step is +not yet necessary, in our view, but we cannot indefinitely continue to +ignore the aggression against our community taken by a party that has +long profited from the commercial distribution of our programs. We +urge users of SCO Unix to make clear to SCO their disapproval of the +company's aggression against the free software community. We will +have a further announcement concerning continuing support of SCO Unix +by GCC before our next release. |