summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/README.SCO
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authormmitchel <mmitchel@138bc75d-0d04-0410-961f-82ee72b054a4>2003-08-03 14:51:42 +0000
committermmitchel <mmitchel@138bc75d-0d04-0410-961f-82ee72b054a4>2003-08-03 14:51:42 +0000
commit5d982d498c7f0154fd61f9119805b8c8a705055e (patch)
treef7a375ab69bd449b0839b80d41fec6ed76e2d010 /README.SCO
parent66603c97d9b4783e23aa6dd6cceb6dd32f181af0 (diff)
downloadgcc-5d982d498c7f0154fd61f9119805b8c8a705055e.tar.gz
* README.SCO: New file.
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk@70122 138bc75d-0d04-0410-961f-82ee72b054a4
Diffstat (limited to 'README.SCO')
-rw-r--r--README.SCO27
1 files changed, 27 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/README.SCO b/README.SCO
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..f86b82b689c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/README.SCO
@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
+As all users of GCC will know, SCO has recently made claims concerning
+alleged copyright infringement by recent versions of the operating
+system kernel called Linux. SCO has made irresponsible public
+statements about this supposed copyright infringement without
+releasing any evidence of the infringement, and has demanded that
+users of Linux, the kernel most often used with the GNU system, pay
+for a license. This license is incompatible with the GPL, and in the
+opinion of the Free Software Foundation such a demand unquestionably
+violates the GNU General Public License under which the kernel is
+distributed.
+
+We have been urged to drop support for SCO Unix from this release of
+GCC, as a protest against this irresponsible aggression against free
+software and GNU/Linux. However, the direct effect of this action
+would fall on users of GCC rather than on SCO. For the moment, we
+have decided not to take that action. The Free Software Foundation's
+overriding goal is to protect the freedom of the free software
+community, including developers and users, but we also want to serve
+users. Protecting the community from an attack sometimes requires
+steps that will inconvenience some in the community. Such a step is
+not yet necessary, in our view, but we cannot indefinitely continue to
+ignore the aggression against our community taken by a party that has
+long profited from the commercial distribution of our programs. We
+urge users of SCO Unix to make clear to SCO their disapproval of the
+company's aggression against the free software community. We will
+have a further announcement concerning continuing support of SCO Unix
+by GCC before our next release.