summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/doc/lispintro/emacs-lisp-intro.texi
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/lispintro/emacs-lisp-intro.texi')
-rw-r--r--doc/lispintro/emacs-lisp-intro.texi11
1 files changed, 3 insertions, 8 deletions
diff --git a/doc/lispintro/emacs-lisp-intro.texi b/doc/lispintro/emacs-lisp-intro.texi
index 6cb7b7921c0..49f64fbeff7 100644
--- a/doc/lispintro/emacs-lisp-intro.texi
+++ b/doc/lispintro/emacs-lisp-intro.texi
@@ -22109,16 +22109,11 @@ so that we cannot use it.
Given that writing good English is a rare skill among programmers, we
can ill afford to lose manuals this way.
-@c (texinfo)uref
-(The Free Software Foundation
-@uref{http://www.gnu.org/doc/doc.html#DescriptionsOfGNUDocumentation, ,
-sells printed copies} of free @uref{http://www.gnu.org/doc/doc.html,
-GNU manuals}, too.)
-
Free documentation, like free software, is a matter of freedom, not
price. The problem with these manuals was not that O'Reilly Associates
-charged a price for printed copies---that in itself is fine. (The Free
-Software Foundation sells printed copies of free GNU manuals, too.)
+charged a price for printed copies---that in itself is fine. The Free
+Software Foundation @uref{http://shop.fsf.org, sells printed copies} of
+free @uref{http://www.gnu.org/doc/doc.html, GNU manuals}, too.
But GNU manuals are available in source code form, while these manuals
are available only on paper. GNU manuals come with permission to copy
and modify; the Perl manuals do not. These restrictions are the