summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/man/message.texi
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorMiles Bader <miles@gnu.org>2005-01-07 06:16:20 +0000
committerMiles Bader <miles@gnu.org>2005-01-07 06:16:20 +0000
commit112d84efad57869bf65e1ee002dadb0c42e40308 (patch)
tree3568a202aa05fc9ea27953e9fa88da17ecbc4f48 /man/message.texi
parentc7ce7fc43b68369e18de0ccc5ded610823b8c1da (diff)
downloademacs-112d84efad57869bf65e1ee002dadb0c42e40308.tar.gz
Revision: miles@gnu.org--gnu-2005/emacs--cvs-trunk--0--patch-17
Merge from gnus--rel--5.10 Patches applied: * miles@gnu.org--gnu-2004/gnus--rel--5.10--patch-83 - miles@gnu.org--gnu-2004/gnus--rel--5.10--patch-84 Update from CVS * miles@gnu.org--gnu-2005/gnus--rel--5.10--patch-2 Merge from miles@gnu.org--gnu-2004 2005-01-05 Reiner Steib <Reiner.Steib@gmx.de> * lisp/gnus/spam.el (spam-face): New face. Don't use `gnus-splash-face' which is unreadable in some setups. 2005-01-06 Katsumi Yamaoka <yamaoka@jpl.org> * man/message.texi (Reply): `message-reply-to-function' should return a list. Suggested by ARISAWA Akihiro <ari@mbf.ocn.co.jp>.
Diffstat (limited to 'man/message.texi')
-rw-r--r--man/message.texi19
1 files changed, 9 insertions, 10 deletions
diff --git a/man/message.texi b/man/message.texi
index 4d4f7af2a07..5e488b0e7cf 100644
--- a/man/message.texi
+++ b/man/message.texi
@@ -146,16 +146,15 @@ If you want the replies to go to the @code{Sender} instead of the
This function will be called narrowed to the head of the article that is
being replied to.
-As you can see, this function should return a string if it has an
-opinion as to what the To header should be. If it does not, it should
-just return @code{nil}, and the normal methods for determining the To
-header will be used.
-
-This function can also return a list. In that case, each list element
-should be a cons, where the @sc{car} should be the name of a header
-(e.g. @code{Cc}) and the @sc{cdr} should be the header value
-(e.g. @samp{larsi@@ifi.uio.no}). All these headers will be inserted into
-the head of the outgoing mail.
+As you can see, this function should return a list. In this case, it
+returns @code{((To . "Whom"))} if it has an opinion as to what the To
+header should be. If it does not, it should just return @code{nil}, and
+the normal methods for determining the To header will be used.
+
+Each list element should be a cons, where the @sc{car} should be the
+name of a header (e.g. @code{Cc}) and the @sc{cdr} should be the header
+value (e.g. @samp{larsi@@ifi.uio.no}). All these headers will be
+inserted into the head of the outgoing mail.
@node Wide Reply