diff options
author | Miles Bader <miles@gnu.org> | 2005-01-07 06:16:20 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Miles Bader <miles@gnu.org> | 2005-01-07 06:16:20 +0000 |
commit | 112d84efad57869bf65e1ee002dadb0c42e40308 (patch) | |
tree | 3568a202aa05fc9ea27953e9fa88da17ecbc4f48 /man/message.texi | |
parent | c7ce7fc43b68369e18de0ccc5ded610823b8c1da (diff) | |
download | emacs-112d84efad57869bf65e1ee002dadb0c42e40308.tar.gz |
Revision: miles@gnu.org--gnu-2005/emacs--cvs-trunk--0--patch-17
Merge from gnus--rel--5.10
Patches applied:
* miles@gnu.org--gnu-2004/gnus--rel--5.10--patch-83
- miles@gnu.org--gnu-2004/gnus--rel--5.10--patch-84
Update from CVS
* miles@gnu.org--gnu-2005/gnus--rel--5.10--patch-2
Merge from miles@gnu.org--gnu-2004
2005-01-05 Reiner Steib <Reiner.Steib@gmx.de>
* lisp/gnus/spam.el (spam-face): New face. Don't use `gnus-splash-face'
which is unreadable in some setups.
2005-01-06 Katsumi Yamaoka <yamaoka@jpl.org>
* man/message.texi (Reply): `message-reply-to-function' should return
a list. Suggested by ARISAWA Akihiro <ari@mbf.ocn.co.jp>.
Diffstat (limited to 'man/message.texi')
-rw-r--r-- | man/message.texi | 19 |
1 files changed, 9 insertions, 10 deletions
diff --git a/man/message.texi b/man/message.texi index 4d4f7af2a07..5e488b0e7cf 100644 --- a/man/message.texi +++ b/man/message.texi @@ -146,16 +146,15 @@ If you want the replies to go to the @code{Sender} instead of the This function will be called narrowed to the head of the article that is being replied to. -As you can see, this function should return a string if it has an -opinion as to what the To header should be. If it does not, it should -just return @code{nil}, and the normal methods for determining the To -header will be used. - -This function can also return a list. In that case, each list element -should be a cons, where the @sc{car} should be the name of a header -(e.g. @code{Cc}) and the @sc{cdr} should be the header value -(e.g. @samp{larsi@@ifi.uio.no}). All these headers will be inserted into -the head of the outgoing mail. +As you can see, this function should return a list. In this case, it +returns @code{((To . "Whom"))} if it has an opinion as to what the To +header should be. If it does not, it should just return @code{nil}, and +the normal methods for determining the To header will be used. + +Each list element should be a cons, where the @sc{car} should be the +name of a header (e.g. @code{Cc}) and the @sc{cdr} should be the header +value (e.g. @samp{larsi@@ifi.uio.no}). All these headers will be +inserted into the head of the outgoing mail. @node Wide Reply |