diff options
author | Richard M. Stallman <rms@gnu.org> | 1998-05-19 03:45:57 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Richard M. Stallman <rms@gnu.org> | 1998-05-19 03:45:57 +0000 |
commit | a9f0a989a17f47f9d25b7a426b4e82a8ff684ee4 (patch) | |
tree | d62b5592064177c684f1509989b223623db3f24c /lispref/edebug.texi | |
parent | c6d6572475603083762cb0155ae966de7710bb9c (diff) | |
download | emacs-a9f0a989a17f47f9d25b7a426b4e82a8ff684ee4.tar.gz |
*** empty log message ***
Diffstat (limited to 'lispref/edebug.texi')
-rw-r--r-- | lispref/edebug.texi | 125 |
1 files changed, 62 insertions, 63 deletions
diff --git a/lispref/edebug.texi b/lispref/edebug.texi index d8459d2bcea..c93330e38ae 100644 --- a/lispref/edebug.texi +++ b/lispref/edebug.texi @@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ Display expression results and evaluate expressions as if outside of Edebug. @item -Automatically reevaluate a list of expressions and +Automatically re-evaluate a list of expressions and display their results each time Edebug updates the display. @item @@ -199,11 +199,11 @@ steps into the call after instrumenting the function. @cindex Common Lisp (Edebug) @pindex cl.el @r{(Edebug)} @pindex cl-specs.el - Edebug knows how to instrument all the standard special forms, an -interactive form with an expression argument, anonymous lambda + Edebug knows how to instrument all the standard special forms, +@code{interactive} forms with an expression argument, anonymous lambda expressions, and other defining forms. Edebug cannot know what a user-defined macro will do with the arguments of a macro call, so you -must tell it; @xref{Instrumenting Macro Calls}, for details. +must tell it; see @ref{Instrumenting Macro Calls}, for details. When Edebug is about to instrument code for the first time in a session, it runs the hook @code{edebug-setup-hook}, then sets it to @@ -212,7 +212,7 @@ session, it runs the hook @code{edebug-setup-hook}, then sets it to using, but actually load them only if you use Edebug. @findex eval-expression @r{(Edebug)} - To remove instrumentation from a definition, simply reevaluate its + To remove instrumentation from a definition, simply re-evaluate its definition in a way that does not instrument. There are two ways of evaluating forms that never instrument them: from a file with @code{load}, and from the minibuffer with @code{eval-expression} @@ -335,8 +335,8 @@ Step into the function or macro called by the form after point. @end table The @kbd{h} command proceeds to the stop point near the current location -if point, using a temporary breakpoint. See @ref{Breakpoints}, for more -about breakpoints. +of point, using a temporary breakpoint. See @ref{Breakpoints}, for more +information about breakpoints. The @kbd{f} command runs the program forward over one expression. More precisely, it sets a temporary breakpoint at the position that @@ -463,7 +463,7 @@ with @kbd{u}. First move point to the Edebug stop point of your choice, then type @kbd{b} or @kbd{u} to set or unset a breakpoint there. Unsetting a breakpoint where none has been set has no effect. -Reevaluating or reinstrumenting a definition forgets all its breakpoints. +Re-evaluating or reinstrumenting a definition forgets all its breakpoints. A @dfn{conditional breakpoint} tests a condition each time the program gets there. Any errors that occur as a result of evaluating the @@ -568,7 +568,7 @@ are bound to the values they had outside of Edebug. @subsection Edebug Views These Edebug commands let you view aspects of the buffer and window -status that obtained before entry to Edebug. The outside window +status as they were before entry to Edebug. The outside window configuration is the collection of windows and contents that were in effect outside of Edebug. @@ -745,7 +745,6 @@ After selecting @samp{*edebug*}, you can return to the source code buffer with @kbd{C-c C-w}. The @samp{*edebug*} buffer is killed when you continue execution, and recreated next time it is needed. - @node Printing in Edebug @subsection Printing in Edebug @@ -765,7 +764,6 @@ and @code{edebug-print-level} specify the values to use within Edebug.) @defopt edebug-print-length If non-@code{nil}, bind @code{print-length} to this while printing results in Edebug. The default value is @code{50}. -@xref{Printing in Edebug}. @end defopt @defopt edebug-print-level @@ -785,13 +783,13 @@ edebug-uninstall-custom-print}. @example (setq a '(x y)) -(setcar a a)) +(setcar a a) @end example @noindent Custom printing prints this as @samp{Result: #1=(#1# y)}. The @samp{#1=} notation labels the structure that follows it with the label -@samp{1}, and the @samp{#1#} notation references the previously labelled +@samp{1}, and the @samp{#1#} notation references the previously labeled structure. This notation is used for any shared elements of lists or vectors. @@ -857,12 +855,19 @@ last lines inserted. @cindex frequency counts @cindex performance analysis Edebug provides rudimentary coverage testing and display of execution -frequency. All execution of an instrumented function accumulates -frequency counts, both before and after evaluation of each instrumented -expression, even if the execution mode is Go-nonstop. Coverage testing -is more expensive, so it is done only if @code{edebug-test-coverage} is -non-@code{nil}. The command @kbd{M-x edebug-display-freq-count} -displays both the frequency data and the coverage data (if recorded). +frequency. Coverage testing works by comparing the result of each +expression with the previous result; coverage is considered OK if two +different results are found. Thus, to sufficiently test the coverage of +your code, try to execute it under conditions that evaluate all +expressions more than once, and produce different results for each +expression. Coverage testing makes execution slower, so it is only done +if @code{edebug-test-coverage} is non-@code{nil}. Whether or not +coverage testing is enabled, frequency counting is performed for all +execution of an instrumented function, even if the execution mode is +Go-nonstop. + +Use @kbd{M-x edebug-display-freq-count} to display both the +coverage information and the frequency counts for a definition. @deffn Command edebug-display-freq-count This command displays the frequency count data for each line of the @@ -871,15 +876,16 @@ current definition. The frequency counts appear as comment lines after each line of code, and you can undo all insertions with one @code{undo} command. The counts appear under the @samp{(} before an expression or the @samp{)} -after an expression, or on the last character of a symbol. Values do -not appear if they are equal to the previous count on the same line. +after an expression, or on the last character of a variable. To +simplify the display, a count is not shown if it is equal to the +count of an earlier expression on the same line. The character @samp{=} following the count for an expression says that -the expression has returned the same value each time it was evaluated +the expression has returned the same value each time it was evaluated. This is the only coverage information that Edebug records. To clear the frequency count and coverage data for a definition, -reinstrument it. +simply reinstrument it with @code{eval-defun}. @end deffn For example, after evaluating @code{(fac 5)} with a source @@ -930,8 +936,8 @@ program. @itemize @bullet @item @code{max-lisp-eval-depth} and @code{max-specpdl-size} are both -incremented one time to reduce Edebug's impact on the stack. -You could, however, still run out of stack space when using Edebug. +incremented once to reduce Edebug's impact on the stack. You could, +however, still run out of stack space when using Edebug. @item The state of keyboard macro execution is saved and restored. While @@ -1067,8 +1073,8 @@ name. @end deffn Here is a simple example that defines the specification for the -@code{for} macro described in the Emacs Lisp Reference Manual, followed -by an alternative, equivalent specification. +@code{for} example macro (@code{Argument Evaluation}), followed by an +alternative, equivalent specification. @example (def-edebug-spec for @@ -1091,7 +1097,7 @@ None of the arguments is instrumented. @item a symbol The symbol must have an Edebug specification which is used instead. This indirection is repeated until another kind of specification is -found. This allows you to inherit the specification for another macro. +found. This allows you to inherit the specification from another macro. @item a list The elements of the list describe the types of the arguments of a @@ -1137,9 +1143,8 @@ their meanings: @table @code @item sexp -A single Lisp object, not unevaluated. -@c "unevaluated expression" is not meaningful, because -@c an expression is a Lisp object intended for evaluation. +A single unevaluated expression, which is not instrumented. +@c an "expression" is not necessarily intended for evaluation. @item form A single evaluated expression, which is instrumented. @@ -1202,7 +1207,7 @@ succeeds. @item &define @kindex &define @r{(Edebug)} Indicates that the specification is for a defining form. The defining -form itself is not instrumented (i.e. Edebug does not stop before and +form itself is not instrumented (that is, Edebug does not stop before and after the defining form), but forms inside it typically will be instrumented. The @code{&define} keyword should be the first element in a list specification. @@ -1260,7 +1265,7 @@ a list whose elements match the specification @var{elements}. A sublist specification may be a dotted list and the corresponding list argument may then be a dotted list. Alternatively, the last @sc{cdr} of a dotted list specification may be another sublist specification (via a -grouping or an indirect specification, e.g. @code{(spec . [(more +grouping or an indirect specification, e.g., @code{(spec . [(more specs@dots{})])}) whose elements match the non-dotted list arguments. This is useful in recursive specifications such as in the backquote example below. Also see the description of a @code{nil} specification @@ -1293,7 +1298,7 @@ than once. @item arg The argument, a symbol, is the name of an argument of the defining form. -However, lambda list keywords (symbols starting with @samp{@code{&}}) +However, lambda-list keywords (symbols starting with @samp{&}) are not allowed. @item lambda-list @@ -1326,33 +1331,35 @@ necessarily mean a syntax error will be signaled; instead, exhausted. Eventually every element of the argument list must be matched by some element in the specification, and every required element in the specification must match some argument. - -Backtracking is disabled for the remainder of a sublist or group when -certain conditions occur, described below. Backtracking is reenabled -when a new alternative is established by @code{&optional}, @code{&rest}, -or @code{&or}. It is also reenabled initially when processing a -sublist or group specification or an indirect specification. - -You might want to disable backtracking to commit to some alternative so -that Edebug can provide a more specific syntax error message. Normally, -if no alternative matches, Edebug reports that none matched, but if one -alternative is committed to, Edebug can report how it failed to match. - -First, backtracking is disabled while matching any of the form -specifications (i.e. @code{form}, @code{body}, @code{def-form}, and + +When a syntax error is detected, it might not be reported until much +later after higher-level alternatives have been exhausted, and with the +point positioned further from the real error. But if backtracking is +disabled when an error occurs, it can be reported immediately. Note +that backtracking is also reenabled automatically in several situations; +it is reenabled when a new alternative is established by +@code{&optional}, @code{&rest}, or @code{&or}, or at the start of +processing a sublist, group, or indirect specification. The effect of +enabling or disabling backtracking is limited to the remainder of the +level currently being processed and lower levels. + +Backtracking is disabled while matching any of the +form specifications (that is, @code{form}, @code{body}, @code{def-form}, and @code{def-body}). These specifications will match any form so any error must be in the form itself rather than at a higher level. -Second, backtracking is disabled after successfully matching a quoted +Backtracking is also disabled after successfully matching a quoted symbol or string specification, since this usually indicates a -recognized construct. If you have a set of alternative constructs that +recognized construct. But if you have a set of alternative constructs that all begin with the same symbol, you can usually work around this constraint by factoring the symbol out of the alternatives, e.g., @code{["foo" &or [first case] [second case] ...]}. -Third, backtracking may be explicitly disabled by using the -@code{gate} specification. This is useful when you know that -no higher alternatives may apply. +Most needs are satisfied by these two ways that bactracking is +automatically disabled, but occasionally it is useful to explicitly +disable backtracking by using the @code{gate} specification. This is +useful when you know that no higher alternatives could apply. See the +example of the @code{let} specification. @node Specification Examples @subsubsection Specification Examples @@ -1362,7 +1369,7 @@ the examples provided here. A @code{let} special form has a sequence of bindings and a body. Each of the bindings is either a symbol or a sublist with a symbol and -optional value. In the specification below, notice the @code{gate} +optional expression. In the specification below, notice the @code{gate} inside of the sublist to prevent backtracking once a sublist is found. @example @@ -1491,19 +1498,11 @@ function entry or exit per line, indented by the recursion level. The default value is @code{nil}. -Also see @code{edebug-tracing}, in @xref{Trace Buffer}. +Also see @code{edebug-tracing}, in @ref{Trace Buffer}. @end defopt @defopt edebug-test-coverage If non-@code{nil}, Edebug tests coverage of all expressions debugged. -This is done by comparing the result of each expression -with the previous result. Coverage is considered OK if two different -results are found. So to sufficiently test the coverage of your code, -try to execute it under conditions that evaluate all expressions more -than once, and produce different results for each expression. - -Use @kbd{M-x edebug-display-freq-count} to display the frequency count -and coverage information for a definition. @xref{Coverage Testing}. @end defopt |