summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/doc/lispref/buffers.texi
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorChong Yidong <cyd@stupidchicken.com>2011-04-08 14:53:26 -0400
committerChong Yidong <cyd@stupidchicken.com>2011-04-08 14:53:26 -0400
commit6b8bc570715801cb194dc4273370eab87628e8bf (patch)
tree01e4531fd38069dffbfb0150a2a596ddd8de2bd2 /doc/lispref/buffers.texi
parent3726838a9cca22d420036cd2462398f54318f5d5 (diff)
parent0080dc6bd919f83c036bb6072800032b1723b248 (diff)
downloademacs-6b8bc570715801cb194dc4273370eab87628e8bf.tar.gz
Merge changes from emacs-23 branch
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/lispref/buffers.texi')
-rw-r--r--doc/lispref/buffers.texi159
1 files changed, 84 insertions, 75 deletions
diff --git a/doc/lispref/buffers.texi b/doc/lispref/buffers.texi
index 07889cdbaa3..0f9de74c948 100644
--- a/doc/lispref/buffers.texi
+++ b/doc/lispref/buffers.texi
@@ -85,43 +85,63 @@ This function returns @code{t} if @var{object} is a buffer,
@cindex changing to another buffer
@cindex current buffer
- There are, in general, many buffers in an Emacs session. At any time,
-one of them is designated as the @dfn{current buffer}. This is the
-buffer in which most editing takes place, because most of the primitives
-for examining or changing text in a buffer operate implicitly on the
-current buffer (@pxref{Text}). Normally the buffer that is displayed on
-the screen in the selected window is the current buffer, but this is not
-always so: a Lisp program can temporarily designate any buffer as
-current in order to operate on its contents, without changing what is
-displayed on the screen.
-
- The way to designate a current buffer in a Lisp program is by calling
-@code{set-buffer}. The specified buffer remains current until a new one
-is designated.
-
- When an editing command returns to the editor command loop, the
-command loop designates the buffer displayed in the selected window as
-current, to prevent confusion: the buffer that the cursor is in when
-Emacs reads a command is the buffer that the command will apply to.
-(@xref{Command Loop}.) Therefore, @code{set-buffer} is not the way to
-switch visibly to a different buffer so that the user can edit it. For
-that, you must use the functions described in @ref{Displaying Buffers}.
-
- @strong{Warning:} Lisp functions that change to a different current buffer
-should not depend on the command loop to set it back afterwards.
-Editing commands written in Emacs Lisp can be called from other programs
-as well as from the command loop; it is convenient for the caller if
-the subroutine does not change which buffer is current (unless, of
-course, that is the subroutine's purpose). Therefore, you should
-normally use @code{set-buffer} within a @code{save-current-buffer} or
-@code{save-excursion} (@pxref{Excursions}) form that will restore the
-current buffer when your function is done. Here, as an example, is a
+ There are, in general, many buffers in an Emacs session. At any
+time, one of them is designated the @dfn{current buffer}---the buffer
+in which most editing takes place. Most of the primitives for
+examining or changing text operate implicitly on the current buffer
+(@pxref{Text}).
+
+ Normally, the buffer displayed in the selected window is the current
+buffer, but this is not always so: a Lisp program can temporarily
+designate any buffer as current in order to operate on its contents,
+without changing what is displayed on the screen. The most basic
+function for designating a current buffer is @code{set-buffer}.
+
+@defun current-buffer
+This function returns the current buffer.
+
+@example
+@group
+(current-buffer)
+ @result{} #<buffer buffers.texi>
+@end group
+@end example
+@end defun
+
+@defun set-buffer buffer-or-name
+This function makes @var{buffer-or-name} the current buffer.
+@var{buffer-or-name} must be an existing buffer or the name of an
+existing buffer. The return value is the buffer made current.
+
+This function does not display the buffer in any window, so the user
+cannot necessarily see the buffer. But Lisp programs will now operate
+on it.
+@end defun
+
+ When an editing command returns to the editor command loop, Emacs
+automatically calls @code{set-buffer} on the buffer shown in the
+selected window. This is to prevent confusion: it ensures that the
+buffer that the cursor is in, when Emacs reads a command, is the
+buffer to which that command applies (@pxref{Command Loop}). Thus,
+you should not use @code{set-buffer} to switch visibly to a different
+buffer; for that, use the functions described in @ref{Displaying
+Buffers}.
+
+ When writing a Lisp function, do @emph{not} rely on this behavior of
+the command loop to restore the current buffer after an operation.
+Editing commands can also be called as Lisp functions by other
+programs, not just from the command loop; it is convenient for the
+caller if the subroutine does not change which buffer is current
+(unless, of course, that is the subroutine's purpose).
+
+ To operate temporarily on another buffer, put the @code{set-buffer}
+within a @code{save-current-buffer} form. Here, as an example, is a
simplified version of the command @code{append-to-buffer}:
@example
@group
(defun append-to-buffer (buffer start end)
- "Append to specified buffer the text of the region."
+ "Append the text of the region to BUFFER."
(interactive "BAppend to buffer: \nr")
(let ((oldbuf (current-buffer)))
(save-current-buffer
@@ -131,27 +151,36 @@ simplified version of the command @code{append-to-buffer}:
@end example
@noindent
-This function binds a local variable to record the current buffer, and
-then @code{save-current-buffer} arranges to make it current again.
-Next, @code{set-buffer} makes the specified buffer current. Finally,
+Here, we bind a local variable to record the current buffer, and then
+@code{save-current-buffer} arranges to make it current again later.
+Next, @code{set-buffer} makes the specified buffer current, and
@code{insert-buffer-substring} copies the string from the original
-current buffer to the specified (and now current) buffer.
-
- If the buffer appended to happens to be displayed in some window,
-the next redisplay will show how its text has changed. Otherwise, you
-will not see the change immediately on the screen. The buffer becomes
-current temporarily during the execution of the command, but this does
-not cause it to be displayed.
-
- If you make local bindings (with @code{let} or function arguments) for
-a variable that may also have buffer-local bindings, make sure that the
-same buffer is current at the beginning and at the end of the local
-binding's scope. Otherwise you might bind it in one buffer and unbind
-it in another! There are two ways to do this. In simple cases, you may
-see that nothing ever changes the current buffer within the scope of the
-binding. Otherwise, use @code{save-current-buffer} or
-@code{save-excursion} to make sure that the buffer current at the
-beginning is current again whenever the variable is unbound.
+buffer to the specified (and now current) buffer.
+
+ Alternatively, we can use the @code{with-current-buffer} macro:
+
+@example
+@group
+(defun append-to-buffer (buffer start end)
+ "Append the text of the region to BUFFER."
+ (interactive "BAppend to buffer: \nr")
+ (let ((oldbuf (current-buffer)))
+ (with-current-buffer (get-buffer-create buffer)
+ (insert-buffer-substring oldbuf start end))))
+@end group
+@end example
+
+ In either case, if the buffer appended to happens to be displayed in
+some window, the next redisplay will show how its text has changed.
+If it is not displayed in any window, you will not see the change
+immediately on the screen. The command causes the buffer to become
+current temporarily, but does not cause it to be displayed.
+
+ If you make local bindings (with @code{let} or function arguments)
+for a variable that may also have buffer-local bindings, make sure
+that the same buffer is current at the beginning and at the end of the
+local binding's scope. Otherwise you might bind it in one buffer and
+unbind it in another!
Do not rely on using @code{set-buffer} to change the current buffer
back, because that won't do the job if a quit happens while the wrong
@@ -168,29 +197,9 @@ have been wrong to do this:
@end example
@noindent
-Using @code{save-current-buffer}, as we did, handles quitting, errors,
-and @code{throw}, as well as ordinary evaluation.
-
-@defun current-buffer
-This function returns the current buffer.
-
-@example
-@group
-(current-buffer)
- @result{} #<buffer buffers.texi>
-@end group
-@end example
-@end defun
-
-@defun set-buffer buffer-or-name
-This function makes @var{buffer-or-name} the current buffer.
-@var{buffer-or-name} must be an existing buffer or the name of an
-existing buffer. The return value is the buffer made current.
-
-This function does not display the buffer in any window, so the user
-cannot necessarily see the buffer. But Lisp programs will now operate
-on it.
-@end defun
+Using @code{save-current-buffer} or @code{with-current-buffer}, as we
+did, correctly handles quitting, errors, and @code{throw}, as well as
+ordinary evaluation.
@defspec save-current-buffer body@dots{}
The @code{save-current-buffer} special form saves the identity of the