diff options
| author | Juri Linkov <juri@jurta.org> | 2005-07-12 06:18:38 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Juri Linkov <juri@jurta.org> | 2005-07-12 06:18:38 +0000 |
| commit | 2f9a4a2226b234e68d87735a0af9a46ceaa546ed (patch) | |
| tree | 089d2eb20154488d16c9d06f4dbd27ab5f90e685 | |
| parent | 9e5f497df1e0a842602c57abc11c48a328bfe43e (diff) | |
| download | emacs-2f9a4a2226b234e68d87735a0af9a46ceaa546ed.tar.gz | |
Fix typos.
| -rw-r--r-- | man/gnu.texi | 4 |
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/man/gnu.texi b/man/gnu.texi index d28a4dd0350..43d4ab0cacd 100644 --- a/man/gnu.texi +++ b/man/gnu.texi @@ -382,13 +382,13 @@ other people's lives; and it is usually used to make their lives more difficult. People who have studied the issue of intellectual property -rights@footnote{n the 80s I had not yet realized how confusing it was +rights@footnote{In the 80s I had not yet realized how confusing it was to speak of ``the issue'' of ``intellectual property.'' That term is obviously biased; more subtle is the fact that it lumps together various disparate laws which raise very different issues. Nowadays I urge people to reject the term ``intellectual property'' entirely, lest it lead others to suppose that those laws form one coherent -issue. The way to be clear is to to discuss patents, copyrights, and +issue. The way to be clear is to discuss patents, copyrights, and trademarks separately. See @uref{http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/not-ipr.xhtml} for more explanation of how this term spreads confusion and bias.} carefully |