diff options
author | Noam Postavsky <npostavs@gmail.com> | 2019-04-19 00:55:14 -0400 |
---|---|---|
committer | Noam Postavsky <npostavs@gmail.com> | 2019-04-28 17:20:17 -0400 |
commit | 140e7f890fa94f8b6381dfa3e0682cacfa92a593 (patch) | |
tree | 3912ef04d7bc01108fa48c5193f8e2a9a24d7d53 | |
parent | 7cb5364ef5334de0fb1bc2e470bea450e4567d24 (diff) | |
download | emacs-140e7f890fa94f8b6381dfa3e0682cacfa92a593.tar.gz |
Recommend using font-lock-face over face (Bug#35044)
* doc/lispref/modes.texi (Precalculated Fontification): Explain
advantages of using font-lock-face over face.
-rw-r--r-- | doc/lispref/modes.texi | 7 |
1 files changed, 6 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/doc/lispref/modes.texi b/doc/lispref/modes.texi index 919816f3dee..0ff13d72e2f 100644 --- a/doc/lispref/modes.texi +++ b/doc/lispref/modes.texi @@ -3201,7 +3201,12 @@ is disabled, @code{font-lock-face} has no effect on the display. It is ok for a mode to use @code{font-lock-face} for some text and also use the normal Font Lock machinery. But if the mode does not use the normal Font Lock machinery, it should not set the variable -@code{font-lock-defaults}. +@code{font-lock-defaults}. In this case the @code{face} property will +not be overriden, so using the @code{face} property could work too. +However, using @code{font-lock-face} is generally preferable as it +allows the user to control the fontification by toggling +@code{font-lock-mode}, and lets the code work regardless of whether +the mode uses Font Lock machinery or not. @node Faces for Font Lock @subsection Faces for Font Lock |