1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
|
# frozen_string_literal: true
RSpec.describe "Resolving" do
before :each do
@index = an_awesome_index
end
it "resolves a single gem" do
dep "rack"
should_resolve_as %w[rack-1.1]
end
it "resolves a gem with dependencies" do
dep "actionpack"
should_resolve_as %w[actionpack-2.3.5 activesupport-2.3.5 rack-1.0]
end
it "resolves a conflicting index" do
@index = a_conflict_index
dep "my_app"
should_resolve_as %w[activemodel-3.2.11 builder-3.0.4 grape-0.2.6 my_app-1.0.0]
end
it "resolves a complex conflicting index" do
@index = a_complex_conflict_index
dep "my_app"
should_resolve_as %w[a-1.4.0 b-0.3.5 c-3.2 d-0.9.8 my_app-1.1.0]
end
it "resolves a index with conflict on child" do
@index = index_with_conflict_on_child
dep "chef_app"
should_resolve_as %w[berkshelf-2.0.7 chef-10.26 chef_app-1.0.0 json-1.7.7]
end
it "prefers explicitly requested dependencies when resolving an index which would otherwise be ambiguous" do
@index = an_ambiguous_index
dep "a"
dep "b"
should_resolve_as %w[a-1.0.0 b-2.0.0 c-1.0.0 d-1.0.0]
end
it "prefers non-prerelease resolutions in sort order" do
@index = optional_prereleases_index
dep "a"
dep "b"
should_resolve_as %w[a-1.0.0 b-1.5.0]
end
it "resolves a index with root level conflict on child" do
@index = a_index_with_root_conflict_on_child
dep "i18n", "~> 0.4"
dep "activesupport", "~> 3.0"
dep "activerecord", "~> 3.0"
dep "builder", "~> 2.1.2"
should_resolve_as %w[activesupport-3.0.5 i18n-0.4.2 builder-2.1.2 activerecord-3.0.5 activemodel-3.0.5]
end
it "resolves a gem specified with a pre-release version" do
dep "activesupport", "~> 3.0.0.beta"
dep "activemerchant"
should_resolve_as %w[activemerchant-2.3.5 activesupport-3.0.0.beta1]
end
it "doesn't select a pre-release if not specified in the Gemfile" do
dep "activesupport"
dep "reform"
should_resolve_as %w[reform-1.0.0 activesupport-2.3.5]
end
it "doesn't select a pre-release for sub-dependencies" do
dep "reform"
should_resolve_as %w[reform-1.0.0 activesupport-2.3.5]
end
it "selects a pre-release for sub-dependencies if it's the only option" do
dep "need-pre"
should_resolve_as %w[need-pre-1.0.0 activesupport-3.0.0.beta1]
end
it "selects a pre-release if it's specified in the Gemfile" do
dep "activesupport", "= 3.0.0.beta"
dep "actionpack"
should_resolve_as %w[activesupport-3.0.0.beta actionpack-3.0.0.beta rack-1.1 rack-mount-0.6]
end
it "raises an exception if a child dependency is not resolved" do
@index = a_unresovable_child_index
dep "chef_app_error"
expect do
resolve
end.to raise_error(Bundler::VersionConflict)
end
it "raises an exception with the minimal set of conflicting dependencies" do
@index = build_index do
%w[0.9 1.0 2.0].each {|v| gem("a", v) }
gem("b", "1.0") { dep "a", ">= 2" }
gem("c", "1.0") { dep "a", "< 1" }
end
dep "a"
dep "b"
dep "c"
expect do
resolve
end.to raise_error(Bundler::VersionConflict, <<-E.strip)
Bundler could not find compatible versions for gem "a":
In Gemfile:
b was resolved to 1.0, which depends on
a (>= 2)
c was resolved to 1.0, which depends on
a (< 1)
E
end
it "should throw error in case of circular dependencies" do
@index = a_circular_index
dep "circular_app"
expect do
resolve
end.to raise_error(Bundler::CyclicDependencyError, /please remove either gem 'bar' or gem 'foo'/i)
end
# Issue #3459
it "should install the latest possible version of a direct requirement with no constraints given" do
@index = a_complicated_index
dep "foo"
should_resolve_and_include %w[foo-3.0.5]
end
# Issue #3459
it "should install the latest possible version of a direct requirement with constraints given" do
@index = a_complicated_index
dep "foo", ">= 3.0.0"
should_resolve_and_include %w[foo-3.0.5]
end
it "takes into account required_ruby_version" do
@index = build_index do
gem "foo", "1.0.0" do
dep "bar", ">= 0"
end
gem "foo", "2.0.0" do |s|
dep "bar", ">= 0"
s.required_ruby_version = "~> 2.0.0"
end
gem "bar", "1.0.0"
gem "bar", "2.0.0" do |s|
s.required_ruby_version = "~> 2.0.0"
end
gem "Ruby\0", "1.8.7"
end
dep "foo"
dep "Ruby\0", "1.8.7"
deps = []
@deps.each do |d|
deps << Bundler::DepProxy.new(d, "ruby")
end
should_resolve_and_include %w[foo-1.0.0 bar-1.0.0], [[]]
end
context "conservative" do
before :each do
@index = build_index do
gem("foo", "1.3.7") { dep "bar", "~> 2.0" }
gem("foo", "1.3.8") { dep "bar", "~> 2.0" }
gem("foo", "1.4.3") { dep "bar", "~> 2.0" }
gem("foo", "1.4.4") { dep "bar", "~> 2.0" }
gem("foo", "1.4.5") { dep "bar", "~> 2.1" }
gem("foo", "1.5.0") { dep "bar", "~> 2.1" }
gem("foo", "1.5.1") { dep "bar", "~> 3.0" }
gem("foo", "2.0.0") { dep "bar", "~> 3.0" }
gem "bar", %w[2.0.3 2.0.4 2.0.5 2.1.0 2.1.1 3.0.0]
end
dep "foo"
# base represents declared dependencies in the Gemfile that are still satisfied by the lockfile
@base = Bundler::SpecSet.new([])
# locked represents versions in lockfile
@locked = locked(%w[foo 1.4.3], %w[bar 2.0.3])
end
it "resolves all gems to latest patch" do
# strict is not set, so bar goes up a minor version due to dependency from foo 1.4.5
should_conservative_resolve_and_include :patch, [], %w[foo-1.4.5 bar-2.1.1]
end
it "resolves all gems to latest patch strict" do
# strict is set, so foo can only go up to 1.4.4 to avoid bar going up a minor version, and bar can go up to 2.0.5
should_conservative_resolve_and_include [:patch, :strict], [], %w[foo-1.4.4 bar-2.0.5]
end
it "resolves foo only to latest patch - same dependency case" do
@locked = locked(%w[foo 1.3.7], %w[bar 2.0.3])
# bar is locked, and the lock holds here because the dependency on bar doesn't change on the matching foo version.
should_conservative_resolve_and_include :patch, ["foo"], %w[foo-1.3.8 bar-2.0.3]
end
it "resolves foo only to latest patch - changing dependency not declared case" do
# foo is the only gem being requested for update, therefore bar is locked, but bar is NOT
# declared as a dependency in the Gemfile. In this case, locks don't apply to _changing_
# dependencies and since the dependency of the selected foo gem changes, the latest matching
# dependency of "bar", "~> 2.1" -- bar-2.1.1 -- is selected. This is not a bug and follows
# the long-standing documented Conservative Updating behavior of bundle install.
# http://bundler.io/v1.12/man/bundle-install.1.html#CONSERVATIVE-UPDATING
should_conservative_resolve_and_include :patch, ["foo"], %w[foo-1.4.5 bar-2.1.1]
end
it "resolves foo only to latest patch - changing dependency declared case" do
# bar is locked AND a declared dependency in the Gemfile, so it will not move, and therefore
# foo can only move up to 1.4.4.
@base << build_spec("bar", "2.0.3").first
should_conservative_resolve_and_include :patch, ["foo"], %w[foo-1.4.4 bar-2.0.3]
end
it "resolves foo only to latest patch strict" do
# adding strict helps solve the possibly unexpected behavior of bar changing in the prior test case,
# because no versions will be returned for bar ~> 2.1, so the engine falls back to ~> 2.0 (turn on
# debugging to see this happen).
should_conservative_resolve_and_include [:patch, :strict], ["foo"], %w[foo-1.4.4 bar-2.0.3]
end
it "resolves bar only to latest patch" do
# bar is locked, so foo can only go up to 1.4.4
should_conservative_resolve_and_include :patch, ["bar"], %w[foo-1.4.3 bar-2.0.5]
end
it "resolves all gems to latest minor" do
# strict is not set, so bar goes up a major version due to dependency from foo 1.4.5
should_conservative_resolve_and_include :minor, [], %w[foo-1.5.1 bar-3.0.0]
end
it "resolves all gems to latest minor strict" do
# strict is set, so foo can only go up to 1.5.0 to avoid bar going up a major version
should_conservative_resolve_and_include [:minor, :strict], [], %w[foo-1.5.0 bar-2.1.1]
end
it "resolves all gems to latest major" do
should_conservative_resolve_and_include :major, [], %w[foo-2.0.0 bar-3.0.0]
end
it "resolves all gems to latest major strict" do
should_conservative_resolve_and_include [:major, :strict], [], %w[foo-2.0.0 bar-3.0.0]
end
# Why would this happen in real life? If bar 2.2 has a bug that the author of foo wants to bypass
# by reverting the dependency, the author of foo could release a new gem with an older requirement.
context "revert to previous" do
before :each do
@index = build_index do
gem("foo", "1.4.3") { dep "bar", "~> 2.2" }
gem("foo", "1.4.4") { dep "bar", "~> 2.1.0" }
gem("foo", "1.5.0") { dep "bar", "~> 2.0.0" }
gem "bar", %w[2.0.5 2.1.1 2.2.3]
end
dep "foo"
# base represents declared dependencies in the Gemfile that are still satisfied by the lockfile
@base = Bundler::SpecSet.new([])
# locked represents versions in lockfile
@locked = locked(%w[foo 1.4.3], %w[bar 2.2.3])
end
it "could revert to a previous version level patch" do
should_conservative_resolve_and_include :patch, [], %w[foo-1.4.4 bar-2.1.1]
end
it "cannot revert to a previous version in strict mode level patch" do
# fall back to the locked resolution since strict means we can't regress either version
should_conservative_resolve_and_include [:patch, :strict], [], %w[foo-1.4.3 bar-2.2.3]
end
it "could revert to a previous version level minor" do
should_conservative_resolve_and_include :minor, [], %w[foo-1.5.0 bar-2.0.5]
end
it "cannot revert to a previous version in strict mode level minor" do
# fall back to the locked resolution since strict means we can't regress either version
should_conservative_resolve_and_include [:minor, :strict], [], %w[foo-1.4.3 bar-2.2.3]
end
end
end
end
|