Mark pending two failing specs.

segiddins and I are agreed there appears to be an issue with Molinillo
in these cases, but they are unusual and for now we're looking to do an
undocumented release of the new conservative updates, so we can start to
get feedback. We'll revisit these cases.

1 files changed, 2 insertions, 4 deletions

diff --git a/spec/resolver/basic_spec.rb b/spec/resolver/basic_spec.rb
index 2542baac51..48224ae7af 100644
--- a/spec/resolver/basic_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/resolver/basic_spec.rb
@@ -207,15 +207,12 @@ describe "Resolving" do
         @locked = locked(%w(foo 1.4.3), %w(bar 2.2.3))
       end
 
-      after :each do
-        ENV["DEBUG_RESOLVER"] = nil
-      end
-
       it "could revert to a previous version level patch" do
         should_conservative_resolve_and_include :patch, [], %w(foo-1.4.4 bar-2.1.1)
       end
 
       it "will not revert to a previous version in strict mode level patch" do
+        pending "possible issue with molinillo - needs further research"
         ENV["DEBUG_RESOLVER"] = "true"
         should_conservative_resolve_and_include [:patch, :strict], [], %w(foo-1.4.3 bar-2.1.1)
       end
@@ -225,6 +222,7 @@ describe "Resolving" do
       end
 
       it "will not revert to a previous version in strict mode level minor" do
+        pending "possible issue with molinillo - needs further research"
         should_conservative_resolve_and_include [:minor, :strict], [], %w(foo-1.4.3 bar-2.1.1)
       end
     end