summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/gdb
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorTom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de>2020-02-25 08:14:41 +0100
committerTom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de>2020-02-25 08:14:41 +0100
commit70d497007d097a68cbd5e78104619f4f88a09838 (patch)
treed30ee8df7ba79d45b5e3007a4fe039dee4e6e7d9 /gdb
parent8cb5117ccfa578e6c531fcad4851be0f13b53f3b (diff)
downloadbinutils-gdb-70d497007d097a68cbd5e78104619f4f88a09838.tar.gz
[gdb/testsuite] Remove gcc/93866 xfail in methods.exp
The test-case gdb.go/methods.exp contains an xfail for PR gcc/93866. However, that PR has been marked resolved-wontfix, with clarification that the gccgo symbol names for methods are correct, even if they're not the same as for gc. Remove the xfail. Tested on x86_64-linux with gccgo-10. gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog: 2020-02-25 Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de> PR go/18926 * gdb.go/methods.exp: Remove gcc/93866 xfail.
Diffstat (limited to 'gdb')
-rw-r--r--gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog5
-rw-r--r--gdb/testsuite/gdb.go/methods.exp17
2 files changed, 13 insertions, 9 deletions
diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog b/gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog
index 6e507851827..8ac38049b60 100644
--- a/gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog
+++ b/gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
+2020-02-25 Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de>
+
+ PR go/18926
+ * gdb.go/methods.exp: Remove gcc/93866 xfail.
+
2020-02-24 Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de>
PR gdb/25592
diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.go/methods.exp b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.go/methods.exp
index b24ee14cf2c..068212044cb 100644
--- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.go/methods.exp
+++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.go/methods.exp
@@ -29,8 +29,7 @@ if { [prepare_for_testing "failed to prepare" ${testfile} ${srcfile} {debug go}]
}
set bp_location1 {main.T.Foo}
-set bp_location2 {main.(*T).Bar}
-set bp_location2_regexp {main.\(\*T\).Bar}
+set bp_location2 {main.T.Bar}
if { [go_runto_main] < 0 } {
untested "could not run to main"
@@ -49,7 +48,6 @@ gdb_test_multiple "maintenance print symbols" "" {
exp_continue
}
-re "^\r\n void main.T.Bar\[^\r\n\]*(?=\r\n)" {
- set found_wrong_bar 2
exp_continue
}
-re "\r\n$gdb_prompt $" {
@@ -86,20 +84,21 @@ if { $found_wrong_bar == 1 } {
# <1><528>: Abbrev Number: 19 (DW_TAG_subprogram)
# <529> DW_AT_name : main.Bar.pN6_main.T
setup_xfail "*-*-*"
-} elseif { $found_wrong_bar == 2 } {
+} else {
# We have with gccgo-8/9/10:
# <1><6e4>: Abbrev Number: 24 (DW_TAG_subprogram)
# <6e5> DW_AT_name : main.Bar..1main.T
# <6ec> DW_AT_linkage_name: main.T.Bar
- # xfail for GCC PR93866
- setup_xfail "*-*-*"
-} else {
+
# For reference: with go1.11.13:
# <1><6c49a>: Abbrev Number: 2 (DW_TAG_subprogram)
# <6c49b> DW_AT_name : main.(*T).Bar
- }
+
+ # It has been clarified in PR gcc/93866 that it's ok that symbols names
+ # diverge between gc and gccgo. So, we accept the main.T.Bar as valid.
+}
if { [gdb_breakpoint ${bp_location2} message] } {
- gdb_test "cont" "Breakpoint .*, ${bp_location2_regexp}.*" \
+ gdb_test "cont" "Breakpoint .*, ${bp_location2}.*" \
"going to second breakpoint"
}