diff options
author | Tom Tromey <tromey@adacore.com> | 2019-08-13 11:39:58 -0600 |
---|---|---|
committer | Tom Tromey <tromey@adacore.com> | 2019-08-19 10:32:03 -0600 |
commit | f21c2bd7b7ef2a9c47e5713cabaa784bcf5c2bee (patch) | |
tree | b59e02ba87703ec277f2f63dbc1e6b617d3b6b92 /bfd/elf32-ip2k.c | |
parent | d806ea2d0ef362fcddd2c1659f537b68aa114203 (diff) | |
download | binutils-gdb-f21c2bd7b7ef2a9c47e5713cabaa784bcf5c2bee.tar.gz |
Fix Fortran regression with variables in nested functions
Sergio pointed out that commit commit aa3b6533 ("Allow nested function
displays") regressed a few gdb.fortran tests. I was able to reproduce
these failures with gcc head.
The bug is that some spots calling contained_in will in fact do the
wrong thing if nested functions are considered as contained. In the
particular case of the Fortran regression, it was the call in
block_innermost_frame, being called from get_hosting_frame -- in this
case, the caller is specifically trying to avoid the nested case.
This patch fixes the problem by adding an "allow_nested" parameter to
contained_in, essentially reverting the change for most callers.
gdb/ChangeLog
2019-08-19 Tom Tromey <tromey@adacore.com>
* printcmd.c (do_one_display, info_display_command): Update.
* block.h (contained_in): Return bool. Add allow_nested
parameter.
* block.c (contained_in): Return bool. Add allow_nested
parameter.
Diffstat (limited to 'bfd/elf32-ip2k.c')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions